ruaok: so I was thinking we can explain on the `info` page what each feedback option actually means. I guess it is important for us to do that so user can understand what exactly their feedback means!
2020-11-05 31036, 2020
pristine___
shivam-kapila: was just looking at YouTube's feedback options, they look great. We can definitely improve ours in future. Though YouTube doesn't allow to edit the feedback once submitted, I guess we are doing great since we allow the edits.
here's something I learned this week: Many of spotify's "mood playlists" are automatically generated based on your tastes, rather than manually created
2020-11-05 31017, 2020
alastairp
after all of the promotion they did in terms of the articles talking about their playlist experts who manually made playlists... turns out that they _do_ automate a whole bunch of it
2020-11-05 31051, 2020
ruaok
alastairp: Mr_Monkey: Noms? or should we steal shauna's food?
2020-11-05 31007, 2020
Mr_Monkey
NOMS
2020-11-05 31010, 2020
alastairp
I bought tupper, happy to wait for you to order
2020-11-05 31036, 2020
alastairp
I could go for another of those coconut things though
2020-11-05 31010, 2020
ruaok
ask an ye shall receive. :)
2020-11-05 31046, 2020
ruaok
I'm listening to my daily jams every day when I get to the office. I've very pleased with it already and there are a lot of improvements pending. joy!
2020-11-05 31013, 2020
alastairp
nice
2020-11-05 31003, 2020
Mr_Monkey
ruaok: 15 minutes out
2020-11-05 31010, 2020
ruaok
fanks!
2020-11-05 31056, 2020
Mr_Monkey
pristine___: It took me a while to figure out the issue with the Rec tests, but I just had my eureka moment: we replace the afterRecommendationsDisplay function with a jest spy function, so of course the original one (and its setstate({loading:false}) isn't called:
pristine___: in that test we don't overwrite `afterRecommendationsDisplay`, that's why
2020-11-05 31021, 2020
Mr_Monkey
shivam-kapila: Do you know if there is a way to spy on a function in Jest without replacing it? Meaning it'll keep working as usual but I can test if it's been called?
in the context of an item in the troi pipeline do you expect to pass in text or mbid?
2020-11-05 31036, 2020
alastairp
I guess if you go mbid -> metadata lookup, then you already have identically matching metadata
2020-11-05 31049, 2020
alastairp
and you conveniently bypass the issue of non-merged recording mbids
2020-11-05 31007, 2020
ruaok
text only was my plan.
2020-11-05 31006, 2020
alastairp
pristine___: hi, I was just talking to ruaok about your work on artist similarity in spark. this sounds really similar to previous work that both iliekcomputers and I did, so it would be great to have a talk to you some time about what you're planning on doing to make sure that we do it in a way that combines all of our ideas
2020-11-05 31054, 2020
pristine___
alastairp: I think I can write a small doc on the work I plan to do!
The support email that came just now seems concerning...
2020-11-05 31011, 2020
ruaok
not quite sure what to make of it
2020-11-05 31034, 2020
ruaok
yvanzo: I've forwarded you that mail -- can you please take a look?
2020-11-05 31043, 2020
ruaok
I'll take care of the autoedit bits.
2020-11-05 31047, 2020
ruaok
zas: are you aware of any breaches to our servers? we have an old skool user saying that he got spam on a recently changed email address that was clearly only used in MB context.
2020-11-05 31010, 2020
ruaok
reosarevok: thanks for taking care of those.
2020-11-05 31029, 2020
reosarevok
np
2020-11-05 31040, 2020
reosarevok
Sorry, was already on it and didn't see your message here
2020-11-05 31024, 2020
ruaok
no pasó nada.
2020-11-05 31018, 2020
zas
not aware of any, but... it doesn't mean it wasn't the case
2020-11-05 31025, 2020
ruaok
I doubt we were compromised, question is did our data dumps leak data?
about data dumps, I guess bitmap is the right person to ask to. I'll check servers for any hint. Can you pm me the concerned email address?
2020-11-05 31041, 2020
alastairp
ruaok: got a sec to discuss the names that I should give something?
2020-11-05 31058, 2020
ruaok
zas: done.
2020-11-05 31037, 2020
bitmap
we've been careful to sanitize those and haven't made any changes there recently, but I can certainly download a dump and check
2020-11-05 31055, 2020
bitmap
can't think of any places we'd leak the email on the website either
2020-11-05 31049, 2020
bitmap
no emails in mbdump-editor
2020-11-05 31031, 2020
reosarevok
Discourse? Jira?
2020-11-05 31015, 2020
bitmap
probably not jira since they haven't logged in there in years
2020-11-05 31035, 2020
zas
if there was a leak, I'd say more than one user would complain. This user changed email because of spam, added one digit to the previous email address... so my feeling it has nothing to do with us
2020-11-05 31002, 2020
ruaok
zas: my feeling as well. I asked Jan to forward the spam mail.
2020-11-05 31008, 2020
ruaok
(with headers)
2020-11-05 31034, 2020
bitmap
I can try creating a test account with a sufficiently random address and see what happens
2020-11-05 31011, 2020
ruaok
for what? to see if it gathers spam?
2020-11-05 31000, 2020
bitmap
right
2020-11-05 31033, 2020
ruaok
can't hurt, I guess. maybe document it in syswiki?
2020-11-05 31039, 2020
alastairp
ruaok: tomorrow I'm going to look at LB-742 and LB-741
