Allow both types, or block new and ask users to click "Classic CA" and paste the resulting ID instead?
2021-04-03 09325, 2021
reosarevok
Or I guess we could use the new format for those since it's the default, and clean up the 23 we have by hand :p
2021-04-03 09350, 2021
sumedh has quit
2021-04-03 09321, 2021
BrainzGit
[musicbrainz-server] reosarevok opened pull request #2033 (master…MBS-11542): MBS-11542 / MBS-11552: Allow and cleanup new Classical Archives links + add validation https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
2021-04-03 09301, 2021
reosarevok
Put the rest of it up for now, because it's better to allow all but Album than no new links at all ^
2021-04-03 09308, 2021
astroanax has quit
2021-04-03 09334, 2021
astroanax joined the channel
2021-04-03 09339, 2021
_lucifer
iliekcomputers, yeah :(. but one student was discussing applying for the mini reviews idea a couple of days here.
2021-04-03 09316, 2021
_lucifer
is it just me or less students seem to be participating in gsoc this year?
2021-04-03 09331, 2021
shivam-kapila
I feel the same.
2021-04-03 09358, 2021
shivam-kapila
Its not less students participating but less confindent do take it up.
2021-04-03 09314, 2021
shivam-kapila
BTW there are 1-2 people interested in LB and have asked a few questions over DM. I had advised them to discuss on channel but I am not sure if they are hesitant.
2021-04-03 09320, 2021
akshaaatt[m]
<_lucifer "akshaaatt: for drafts, sharing o"> Thanks a lot @_lu
2021-04-03 09324, 2021
akshaaatt[m]
> <@freenode__lucifer:matrix.org> akshaaatt: for drafts, sharing on forums is enough. no need for a gdoc. you have already got that covered.
2021-04-03 09324, 2021
akshaaatt[m]
* Thanks a lot _lucifer . One final head-ups on https://community.metabrainz.org/t/gsoc-2021-musi… from you and then I'll share the draft from Google's end and get back to working on the app and hopefully make a few more contributions 😇
2021-04-03 09343, 2021
_lucifer
akshaaatt[m]: you can go ahead and share the draft though google portal. i currently do not have further feedback. if i do later, i will share it on the community post. you can incorporate that in your final proposal.
2021-04-03 09315, 2021
akshaaatt[m]
<_lucifer "akshaaatt: you can go ahead and "> Thank you so much 😇
just wanted to quickly login to my AWS accoun. it required me to enter a user name, answer a captcha (which I failed one time), enter my password, authorize the login via verification link send by SMS to my phone and provide the code from my authenticator app. this stuff has become crazy
2021-04-03 09344, 2021
outsidecontext
forgot to mention that using the authenticator app invloved using my yubikey as well
2021-04-03 09342, 2021
rdswift
I agree. And it's not like you actually have any choice in the matter.
2021-04-03 09319, 2021
outsidecontext
maybe not using 2nd factor auth, that's currently my choice to have activated. but things are more and more pushing towards this, which I generally approve off. but that stuff has anyway become difficult to manage. even logging in to the most simple service sometimes feels like entering a high security facility :D
2021-04-03 09326, 2021
adhi001 joined the channel
2021-04-03 09319, 2021
yvanzo
reosarevok: I would just allow both for now as it is likely to change on CA's side but we don't know how yet.
2021-04-03 09336, 2021
sumedh has quit
2021-04-03 09302, 2021
jasondk joined the channel
2021-04-03 09311, 2021
jasondk
Is there an API endpoint to lookup a release mbid from a release msid?
2021-04-03 09338, 2021
jasondk
Right now I'm using the recording-search on https://labs.api.listenbrainz.org but I'm wondering if there is a way that uses the release msid
