yvanzo: "Since periods (.) and tags preceded with a + sign on the user side of the address (that is, before the @ sign) are often used as “free aliases” by email providers, both of these are ignored by this search to help you find address aliases. This will only get triggered if your query looks like an address (including @)." ?
2021-04-27 11701, 2021
yvanzo
reosarevok: A regexp with escaped dots doesn't “look like an address”. Providing examples might be more clear.
2021-04-27 11720, 2021
reosarevok
"This will only get triggered if your query includes @ (so, both example@example.com and example@ will match exam.ple+mb@example.com, but just example will not)." then or something like that?
2021-04-27 11731, 2021
yvanzo
or shorter: "if your query contains a @ sign"
2021-04-27 11733, 2021
yvanzo
yes
2021-04-27 11716, 2021
yvanzo
reosarevok: actually just 'example' will match because there is neither dot nor plus in it.
When I run sudo docker-compose exec mq rabbitmqadmin -u sir -p sir -V /search-index-rebuilder list queues should the "search.index" number be dropping? It's at 73939 for a while.
2021-04-27 11725, 2021
nelgin
Oh, there it goes, just dropped by 500.
2021-04-27 11715, 2021
leonardo3 joined the channel
2021-04-27 11737, 2021
yvanzo
yes, it should be dropping, but not necessarily to 0.
2021-04-27 11731, 2021
yvanzo
reosarevok: the . and the + have to be escaped in examples.
2021-04-27 11739, 2021
reosarevok
Ok, sure
2021-04-27 11725, 2021
elomatreb[m] has quit
2021-04-27 11726, 2021
lorenzuru has quit
2021-04-27 11728, 2021
leonardo has quit
2021-04-27 11741, 2021
leonardo3 is now known as leonardo
2021-04-27 11715, 2021
elomatreb[m] joined the channel
2021-04-27 11727, 2021
lorenzuru joined the channel
2021-04-27 11704, 2021
nelgin
I think I tried this live indexing before and it was so slow, it would never finish before the next replication run and would keep going up.
Oh look ruaok was enjoying some indian lunch today (personally never tried vindaloo)
2021-04-27 11730, 2021
ruaok
:D
2021-04-27 11733, 2021
ruaok
it wasn't hot enough.
2021-04-27 11715, 2021
shivam-kapila
Oho
2021-04-27 11716, 2021
_lucifer
ruaok: ah no I saw your your latest commit. the client secret and client id are indeed present in the json snippet but we also need an additional api which is separate from all this.
2021-04-27 11730, 2021
_lucifer
*additional api key
2021-04-27 11743, 2021
_lucifer
let me find the relevant docs for that
2021-04-27 11733, 2021
ruaok
i see where to create a key... any thoughts on "restricting" it?
2021-04-27 11740, 2021
_lucifer
yes we should do that. let's do this tomorrow morning. I have just found two contradicting docs. I'll figure out what we need exactly by then.
