#metabrainz

/

      • joshuaboniface has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06225, 2021

      • MajorLurker joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06237, 2021

      • Lotheric has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06207, 2021

      • joshuaboniface joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06253, 2021

      • MajorLurker has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06250, 2021

      • Lotheric joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06208, 2021

      • Lotheric has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06214, 2021

      • Lotheric joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06218, 2021

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] mwiencek opened pull request #1953 (master…paged-relationships): MBS-1178: Relationships table paging https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2021-03-03 06201, 2021

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] mwiencek merged pull request #1947 (master…compare-date-period-changes): compareDates / compareDatePeriods changes https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2021-03-03 06242, 2021

      • BrainzGit has left the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06205, 2021

      • BrainzGit joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06252, 2021

      • d4rkie has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06236, 2021

      • Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06204, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06214, 2021

      • MajorLurker joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06254, 2021

      • MajorLurker has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06255, 2021

      • Nyanko-sensei has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06247, 2021

      • Nyanko-sensei joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06211, 2021

      • mugen joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06254, 2021

      • sumedh joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06216, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06241, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06222, 2021

      • mugen has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06252, 2021

      • d4rkie joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06255, 2021

      • Nyanko-sensei has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06221, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06234, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06256, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06221, 2021

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] reosarevok merged pull request #1936 (master…MBS-11408): MBS-11408: Clarify Edit Note Author edit search options https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2021-03-03 06241, 2021

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] reosarevok merged pull request #1933 (master…MBS-11405): MBS-11405: Don't show ended URL rels in DeprecatedRelationship reports https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2021-03-03 06207, 2021

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] reosarevok merged pull request #1931 (master…MBS-10076): MBS-10076 / MBS-11403: Friendlier error when deleting attribute that has children https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2021-03-03 06250, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06227, 2021

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] reosarevok merged pull request #1928 (master…MBS-11402): MBS-11402: Block smart links: many.link https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2021-03-03 06205, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06237, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06211, 2021

      • antlarr has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06233, 2021

      • antlarr joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06249, 2021

      • MajorLurker joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06256, 2021

      • antlarr has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06258, 2021

      • antlarr joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06201, 2021

      • MajorLurker has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06218, 2021

      • dseomn has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06233, 2021

      • dseomn joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06248, 2021

      • sumedh has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06259, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        Moin !
      • 2021-03-03 06205, 2021

      • yvanzo
        mo’’in’
      • 2021-03-03 06231, 2021

      • shivam-kapila
        Good afternoon
      • 2021-03-03 06228, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06255, 2021

      • ruaok
        moooin!
      • 2021-03-03 06209, 2021

      • reosarevok
        bitmap: for MBS-11409 - do we have a "replace linkedEntities" ticket we could link it to?
      • 2021-03-03 06210, 2021

      • BrainzBot
        MBS-11409: Recurring warning in server logs for recording's page https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/MBS-11409
      • 2021-03-03 06255, 2021

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] reosarevok opened pull request #1954 (master…MBS-8232): MBS-8232: Support more Unicode quotation marks in guess case https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2021-03-03 06215, 2021

      • d4rkie has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06253, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06203, 2021

      • BrainzGit
        [musicbrainz-server] reosarevok merged pull request #1938 (master…MBS-9987): MBS-9987: JSON-LD: Use "Concept URI" for Wikidata https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-server/…
      • 2021-03-03 06231, 2021

      • _lucifer
        ruaok: do we want to make creating dataframes and calculating user similarity two different steps or should a request for similarity implicitly create the dataframes?
      • 2021-03-03 06234, 2021

      • _lucifer
        iliekcomputers: ^
      • 2021-03-03 06208, 2021

      • ruaok
        can creating dataframes be a common step for recommendations and user similarity?
      • 2021-03-03 06219, 2021

      • ruaok
        in which case, separate, clearly.
      • 2021-03-03 06248, 2021

      • _lucifer
        yes but i think the time periods will almost always differ
      • 2021-03-03 06205, 2021

      • _lucifer
        we are thinking in years for similarity but weeks for recommendations
      • 2021-03-03 06217, 2021

      • ruaok
        ok, so data reuse is not likely then. but code reuse -- is it the same code at least?
      • 2021-03-03 06239, 2021

      • _lucifer
        yeah, i am doing that. code will definelty be reused.
      • 2021-03-03 06200, 2021

      • ruaok
        the lets keep it as two steps to keep things similar to how recs are being generated.
      • 2021-03-03 06216, 2021

      • _lucifer
        makes sense
      • 2021-03-03 06213, 2021

      • sumedh joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06201, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
      • 2021-03-03 06216, 2021

      • ruaok
        deep in the middle of that as we speak.
      • 2021-03-03 06223, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        oh awesome.
      • 2021-03-03 06235, 2021

      • ruaok
        I'm pondering the URL "/create-user-recommendation/recording" right now.
      • 2021-03-03 06239, 2021

      • ruaok
        doesn't seem very RESTy.
      • 2021-03-03 06248, 2021

      • ehmry joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06218, 2021

      • ruaok
        /1/user/param/timeline/create ?
      • 2021-03-03 06237, 2021

      • ruaok
        /1/user/param/timeline/create/recording ?
      • 2021-03-03 06242, 2021

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06243, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        yep, happy to change it, i didn't give it much thought tbh
      • 2021-03-03 06258, 2021

      • ruaok
        k, let's take a moment to reason it out.
      • 2021-03-03 06208, 2021

      • ruaok
      • 2021-03-03 06236, 2021

      • ruaok
        /1/user/param/timeline-event/create
      • 2021-03-03 06243, 2021

      • D4RK-PH0ENiX joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06200, 2021

      • ruaok
        let's first decide the base URL.
      • 2021-03-03 06237, 2021

      • ruaok
        `/1/user/<user>/timeline-event` makes sense to me.
      • 2021-03-03 06252, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        yeah, me too.
      • 2021-03-03 06239, 2021

      • ruaok
        `/1/user/<user>/timeline-even/create` to create an event. I personally think the type of the event should go in the POSTed data and not into the URL.
      • 2021-03-03 06251, 2021

      • ruaok
        +t on that.
      • 2021-03-03 06218, 2021

      • ruaok
        thoughts?
      • 2021-03-03 06235, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        the type of the event leads to different types of metadata, which is why i was tending towards different endpoints.
      • 2021-03-03 06204, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        recording -> recording metadata, troi created a playlist -> playlist metadata
      • 2021-03-03 06210, 2021

      • ruaok
        ah, yes. good point.
      • 2021-03-03 06239, 2021

      • ruaok
        `/1/user/<user>/timeline-event/create/recording` and `/1/user/<user>/timeline-event/create/recommendation` ?
      • 2021-03-03 06249, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        yeah, that sounds good to me.
      • 2021-03-03 06252, 2021

      • ruaok
        k
      • 2021-03-03 06241, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        Meanwhile the UI is moving along nicely https://usercontent.irccloud-cdn.com/file/7IjfT6R…
      • 2021-03-03 06206, 2021

      • ruaok
        Mr_Monkey: yes, indeed!
      • 2021-03-03 06212, 2021

      • atj
        very nice
      • 2021-03-03 06210, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        I put the event time on the right in the end despite my initial reaction yesterday, otherwise the mobile view is really going to be a nightmare
      • 2021-03-03 06223, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        shivam-kapila: you were right about the time ! :p
      • 2021-03-03 06241, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        ruaok: we didn't consider one thing.
      • 2021-03-03 06250, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        i want to keep these endpoints in a separate blueprint.
      • 2021-03-03 06213, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        so it'd be great if the prefix could be `/1/timeline-event`
      • 2021-03-03 06209, 2021

      • ruaok
        but its an action done for a specific user, so I feel that it should be under /1/user/<user_name>
      • 2021-03-03 06220, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        hmm.
      • 2021-03-03 06233, 2021

      • ruaok
        otherwise this API endpoint is not consistent with our other user focused endpoints.
      • 2021-03-03 06250, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        yeah, thinking about it, you're right.
      • 2021-03-03 06200, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        i'll change it.
      • 2021-03-03 06219, 2021

      • ruaok
        I'm reading tests now, will submit review soon.
      • 2021-03-03 06207, 2021

      • ruaok
        `Token plsnohack` lol
      • 2021-03-03 06234, 2021

      • ruaok
        submitted.
      • 2021-03-03 06238, 2021

      • iliekcomputers
        :D
      • 2021-03-03 06201, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06218, 2021

      • MajorLurker joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06250, 2021

      • MajorLurker has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06224, 2021

      • sumedh has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06248, 2021

      • shivam-kapila
        Mr_Monkey: haha. atj also voted for the same. Meanwhile I have a small feedback
      • 2021-03-03 06202, 2021

      • shivam-kapila
        The icons on circles look a bit misaligned
      • 2021-03-03 06204, 2021

      • shivam-kapila
        In*
      • 2021-03-03 06249, 2021

      • shivam-kapila
        (Maybe because they arent symmetric along the vertical)
      • 2021-03-03 06257, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        Yeah, I'm stacking two FA icons (one circle, one icon on top) and scaling them, and haven't gotten to either tuning it or replacing it with CSS
      • 2021-03-03 06232, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        Not sure how consistent the vertical spacing is between icons. We'll see.
      • 2021-03-03 06209, 2021

      • shivam-kapila
        Hm. Overall it looks soothing to eyes
      • 2021-03-03 06216, 2021

      • Sophist-UK has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06223, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06217, 2021

      • Sophist-UK joined the channel
      • 2021-03-03 06215, 2021

      • Rohan_Pillai has quit
      • 2021-03-03 06218, 2021

      • reosarevok
        Jeez, that like button on my similar artists page is a bit *too* Facebook, isn't it?
      • 2021-03-03 06238, 2021

      • reosarevok
        I guess it's not trademarked or anything, but maybe we can make it a bit less blatant :D
      • 2021-03-03 06259, 2021

      • zas
        Why a Spotify Premium account is required to play listens on lb?
      • 2021-03-03 06214, 2021

      • ruaok
        there are several reasons. one is a permissions thing that we need that comes with premium, I think. I don't recall the details. and listening to 30 second previews is only a shit experience...
      • 2021-03-03 06220, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        zas: We can only play full songs in a webpage for users with a premium Spotify account. Currently the backup solution (Youtube player) is broken.
      • 2021-03-03 06253, 2021

      • zas
        Since most of my listens come from Bandcamp, I'd expect to be able to play them from there instead, but I guess this will come at some point.
      • 2021-03-03 06232, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        Bandcamp doesn't offer an API to play music unfortunately
      • 2021-03-03 06247, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        They do provide embedded players though
      • 2021-03-03 06214, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        But no search API. Provided the listen has a bandcamp URI we should be able to play it in the embedded player
      • 2021-03-03 06258, 2021

      • atj
        Bandcamp URIs are per release 99% of the time
      • 2021-03-03 06200, 2021

      • zas
        yes, even though that's a bit tricky, as we discussed before, the URI alone doesn't suffice to embed the player, as one needs id
      • 2021-03-03 06207, 2021

      • ruaok
        _lucifer: ping
      • 2021-03-03 06215, 2021

      • _lucifer
        ruaok: pong
      • 2021-03-03 06228, 2021

      • ruaok
        hey, I finally have time to do some hacking.
      • 2021-03-03 06248, 2021

      • ruaok
        the existing PR implemented most of what I had intended to do, so its not clear what I should work on next.
      • 2021-03-03 06252, 2021

      • CatQuest
        honestly i prefer listening to music per-album anyway so...
      • 2021-03-03 06200, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        I think currently the issue with Bandcamp URIs in the listens is that we only have the album URI, not that of the song
      • 2021-03-03 06207, 2021

      • ruaok
        is there anything on the python/lemmy side I can help with on user similarity?
      • 2021-03-03 06208, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        Ah, that was just mentionned :p
      • 2021-03-03 06219, 2021

      • _lucifer
        great, I just updated the branch refactor dataframe code for reuse.
      • 2021-03-03 06223, 2021

      • reosarevok
        Mr_Monkey, zas: if an MBID exists, the MB data might have a Bandcamp link
      • 2021-03-03 06237, 2021

      • Mr_Monkey
        But similarly, to an album page presumably?
      • 2021-03-03 06255, 2021

      • reosarevok
        (when MB has a release bandcamp link, a bot could probably fairly trivially link the recordings to the track pages)
      • 2021-03-03 06255, 2021

      • _lucifer
        not really, i just need to know the format of messages expected by the lb side.
      • 2021-03-03 06256, 2021

      • zas
        yes, but for the album, not for the track, so we need something to look to the album's containing the recording