I do think that in general I wouldn't want people to change their username to one that was used earlier (because I don't want to get confused thinking this editor is the one I knew, when it's someone else)
CatQuest
reosarevok: +1
reosarevok
But I guess that might only matter for a few, more active usernames, since I won't remember the other ones anyway :/
Gentlecat
reosarevok: but when would that happen?
saifulbkhan has quit
CatQuest
i think that's the main reason not to reuse them, actually
ruaok
Gentlecat: if a prominent person quits in a huff and deletes their account.
a spoofer could come in right after.
Gentlecat
ah, right
Freso
Gentlecat: When you decide to change your MB username to RomanT and we get a new cat that wants GentleCat
SothoTalKer
ruaok: FB uses an internal ID for the user, as does MB ;)
CatQuest
common, cool names, and some one renames thmeselves inot soem other name thne someone else takes that oold name
Gentlecat
I was mostly thinking about spam accounts
CatQuest
saiy if i renamed myself "blup" tnhe someoen else went and took "catcat"
Gentlecat
sure, fair enough
CatQuest
on the other hand if soem spam account has a super cool name it woudl be a shame that it gets used up by it
ruaok
I dont have a good feeling which way people are leaning.
Gentlecat
perhaps there can be some kind of period where a username stays "reserved" and after that it can be taken
Freso neither
Quesito
least confusion option seems to be not to reuse user names....
zas
i think names recently used should be prevented to be reused, old ones not
reosarevok
We could do it in a case per case basis ("this username has been used, but it isn't in use now, if you want to use it, contact an admin") but it might be more work for nothing
Leftmost
I think the default should be to prevent reuse, but unused or spam accounts can be purged to allow them to be reused later.
CatQuest
and people who cue not othis might g oand make lots of accoutnts with "desirable" names and (offsite) be all "do this and this and yo ucan have that ccount"
Leftmost
What reo said, basically.
Freso
Leftmost++
ruaok
reosarevok: that is pretty ok, I think.
CatQuest
+1 zas
zas
perhaps just prevent re-using names used within last 3 months
CatQuest
oh i like reo's idea
Leftmost +1!
zas
+1 for reo if he is the admin contacted ;)
Freso
zas: I'd say 3 months is too short, but the specific time is bikeshed paint.
ruaok
let me sum up: "We should prevent re-use in general and implement 9271. However, if someone contacts an admin with a request to re-use and that request is reasonable, it will be granted"
how do we feel about that?
Leftmost
+1
CatQuest
+1
CallerNo6
+1
Freso
ruaok: +1
Quesito
+1
zas
+42
CatQuest
hahaha
yvanzo
+zo
CallerNo6
nice
ruaok
lol
Leo_Verto[m]
+1
ruaok
bitmap: seem pretty clear, then, yes?
+s
CatQuest
s? wtf
SothoTalKer
+1
bitmap
yep, sounds good
reosarevok
As a first case: do we then agree I can remove the PUID-only user, and rename the main user of this guy to it?
CatQuest
the s vote stands it
ruaok
ok, great. thanks. I will write the blog post after the meeting.
Leftmost
So we have 49zos as the tally.
ruaok
Freso: onward.
CatQuest
reosarevok: i say go
ruaok
reosarevok: +1
Freso
reosarevok: Sure.
Okay.
So.
We have ~3 minutes left.
Leo_Verto[m]
My topic is pretty short
Freso
Leo_Verto[m]: Do you think it's enough for BrainzBot?
Alright. Go go. :)
Leo_Verto[m]
Okay, so samj1912 did most of the work editing the existing github plugin to fit our needs
the desired use case was looking up PRs similar to how we can currently look up JIRA issues
so assuming the repo is part of the MeB org, you can add an abbreviation using @gh:abbreviation=repo_name
and then get commits using gh:abbreviation#PR_number