Brilliant! I wish to go and pay my respects in March...
2017-08-20 23240, 2017
agentsim joined the channel
2017-08-20 23246, 2017
UmkaDK_ joined the channel
2017-08-20 23230, 2017
iliekcomputers
Rock garden, Chandigarh is the place :)
2017-08-20 23257, 2017
agentsim has quit
2017-08-20 23227, 2017
UmkaDK has quit
2017-08-20 23219, 2017
agentsim joined the channel
2017-08-20 23215, 2017
Freso
zas: Ping? Can you log in to the Discord server instance and do `cd /var/discourse; git pull; ./launcher rebuild app`?
2017-08-20 23229, 2017
Freso
Sophist-UK: I've mentioned it a couple of times, but AFAIK no one has started work on it.
2017-08-20 23223, 2017
Sophist-UK
Thx.
2017-08-20 23219, 2017
Freso
Gentlecat: Why not support 0-100 input like MusicBrainz and convert it to 1-5 scale for display? I thought that was what was agreed upon in earlier discussions.
2017-08-20 23256, 2017
Gentlecat
we agreed to keep it the same in the backend to make the transition in the future easier
2017-08-20 23210, 2017
Gentlecat
but having 0-100 ratings just doesn't make sense to me
2017-08-20 23257, 2017
Freso
Accepting it on the WS/API side will allow people to import from players with 1-10 systems etc., without losing data.
2017-08-20 23259, 2017
Gentlecat
idk what the history is behind current implementation on MB
2017-08-20 23213, 2017
Freso
s/import from/synchronise with/
2017-08-20 23211, 2017
Gentlecat
we have CB-248 for that and I'd rather make it more correct/clean on CB
let's say we have support for 👍/👎. how we know which sale is used then?
2017-08-20 23242, 2017
Freso
I think it's a bad idea and will ultimately make it harder to entirely move ratings backend from MB to CB.
2017-08-20 23255, 2017
CatQuest
inherent problem with 👍/👎 rating systems :)
2017-08-20 23256, 2017
Gentlecat
that would also make calculating averages much more difficult. how would you calculate averages from different scales?
2017-08-20 23234, 2017
CatQuest
also some systems only have 👍 that is ♡ or star
2017-08-20 23239, 2017
CatQuest
noting for "i don't like"
2017-08-20 23220, 2017
Freso
I don't know, but I think that would be up to whomever makes a script to import those ratings to MB/CB to figure out.
2017-08-20 23228, 2017
Freso
*whoever
2017-08-20 23240, 2017
CatQuest
why not whomever?
2017-08-20 23259, 2017
Freso
whoever is more often correct than whomever, and I'm not sure whomever is correct here.
2017-08-20 23214, 2017
CatQuest
hmm i just take it on feel, :D
2017-08-20 23239, 2017
CatQuest
whom looks right there to me.. but well i wouldn't *know*
2017-08-20 23254, 2017
Freso
Yes, that's why I "corrected" it.
2017-08-20 23221, 2017
CatQuest
because it feels andlooks right but you aren't sure?
2017-08-20 23221, 2017
CatQuest
that's more "*or whoever?" than "*whoever"
2017-08-20 23231, 2017
CatQuest
but ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
2017-08-20 23239, 2017
CallerNo6
one of the farces of highschool was that they tried to teach us e.g. der/dem/den when we couldn't even use who/whom correctly. and most of us still can't.
2017-08-20 23236, 2017
CallerNo6
hmm. "follies", not farces, though there were plenty of both.
