This afternoon I have been creating [type definitions for the OpenLibrary JSON schema](https://github.com/metabrainz/bookbrainz-utils/compare/master...kellnerd:bookbrainz-utils:ol-schema). Originally I intended to do a straightforward PR, but then I realized that a few parts of the old parser need more work to match the expected types 😅
monkey[m]
It's always like that with coding, isn't it :p
The types look good though
kellnerd: By the way, if you missed it, earlier today I published a new version of bookbrainz-data with the validators : 5.2.0
kellnerd[m]
Yeah, I had seen it, I will update it in my bb-utils PR and see if my branch still works :p
kellnerd[m] waits until Deno has cached all the new bb-data dependencies on the fly
(I fear it had to load all dependencies again since it can't efficiently see unchanged modules for npm dependencies.)
monkey[m]
Sounds like NPM
kellnerd[m]
Ok, PR has been updated, testing should now be possible without the hacks I had to resort to "npm link" a package for Deno.
