#bookbrainz

/

      • leftmostcat[m] has quit
      • aerozol[m] has quit
      • spynxic has quit
      • spynxic joined the channel
      • spynx joined the channel
      • spynx has quit
      • spynx joined the channel
      • spynxic has quit
      • spynx has quit
      • spynxic joined the channel
      • vysn has quit
      • kasukabedefencef
        <kasukabedefencef> "Hi, I was working on the calibre..." <- monkey: hi can you please provide me some guidance on this when you have a moment.
      • spynxic has quit
      • spynxic joined the channel
      • monkey[m] joined the channel
      • monkey[m]
        <kasukabedefencef> "monkey: hi can you please..." <- Hi kasukabedefenceforce ! Sorry for the delay. You are right, these two pieces of information are currently missing.
      • Publisher looks like it was forgotten, while the Edition author credits were implemented after this API.
      • monkey[m]: Would you be3 interested in working on adding these missing fields to the API response?
      • monkey[m]: And yes, releaseEventDates[0] is the publication date
      • monkey[m]: err, releaseEventDates is not an array in the response, so the plural naming looks like a mistake.
      • vysn joined the channel
      • kellnerd[m] joined the channel
      • kellnerd[m]
        <monkey[m]> "err, releaseEventDates is not an..." <- IIRC, the database schema would support multiple publication events, but only a single date is exposed to the website.