This afternoon I have been creating [type definitions for the OpenLibrary JSON schema](https://github.com/metabrainz/bookbrainz-…. Originally I intended to do a straightforward PR, but then I realized that a few parts of the old parser need more work to match the expected types 😅
2024-06-27 17937, 2024
monkey[m]
It's always like that with coding, isn't it :p
2024-06-27 17957, 2024
monkey[m]
The types look good though
2024-06-27 17959, 2024
monkey[m]
kellnerd: By the way, if you missed it, earlier today I published a new version of bookbrainz-data with the validators : 5.2.0
2024-06-27 17906, 2024
kellnerd[m]
Yeah, I had seen it, I will update it in my bb-utils PR and see if my branch still works :p
2024-06-27 17920, 2024
kellnerd[m] waits until Deno has cached all the new bb-data dependencies on the fly
2024-06-27 17912, 2024
kellnerd[m]
(I fear it had to load all dependencies again since it can't efficiently see unchanged modules for npm dependencies.)
2024-06-27 17946, 2024
monkey[m]
Sounds like NPM
2024-06-27 17946, 2024
kellnerd[m]
Ok, PR has been updated, testing should now be possible without the hacks I had to resort to "npm link" a package for Deno.
