#musicbrainz

Yes that seems reasonable, I think I will do as you suggested. Thanks!

Hey daleharvey, great to see all the event adds! I don’t know if you saw my last edit note, so I’ll mention something here: I don’t know about using the format of [artist] @ [venue], instead of [artist] at [venue]. The styleguide says to use “at”: https://beta.musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Event

We can always look to change styleguides if they don’t make sense, in the meantime a consistent database/naming format helps everyone. Better to discuss it before you’re 10’s of thousands of events deep!

<aerozol[m]> "Hey daleharvey, great to see all..." <- hrm thats weird I got an email about the last one but not this one, ok apologies yeh will switch to using "at", not a big deal either way here

"I have submitted the edits I mentioned earlier. If anyone would like to review them and cast their vote, I would appreciate it!... (full message at <https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/...>)

Also I hope I understood right the relationships guidelines (I put a relationship only at the release group level)

*

* group level in this auto-edit https://musicbrainz.org/edit/120823242)

Looks perfect to me :)

s/"//