#musicbrainz

test

test successful!

In this string of edits, someone added images and media types to pseudo-releases. I don’t think this is allowed/doesn’t make sense. What do you guys think?

Because those images and mediums have to come from somewhere “real”, and pseudo-releases aren’t real, and this could cause confusion when someone searches for a specific image for example, and the pseudo-track lists can be applied to multiple different releases through relationships.

i don't think media types are appropriate.

having a front cover image shouldn't really be necessary, but i wouldn't refuse them - due to current tagging limitations it's nice to have a cover on them.

hopefully atl tracklists will be a thing Soon ™

alt even

good thing there's a ™ on it!

:)

Okay, since it seems like that’ll rely on “translated/transliterated” relationships, I’ll keep an eye on those, thanks

(hmm, if the release group has the cover set correctly, there's probably no need to have a cover on pseudo-releases at all)

infact it could be hardcoded into picard that if type=pseudo-releases then coverart must be fetched by release group

+1 for that

this style guideline is weird to me. https://musicbrainz.org/doc/Style/Titles/OC_ReM...

why isn't it "(OC ReMix)"

oh god that guideline

it' the number 1 reason i havent tagged any ocremix things or sorted thme

because I have to do it manually because I want it with (OCReMix)

like Gamename: Title (OC ReMix)

derwin: IIRC it's because we wrote that one together with the OC ReMix people who very specifically indicated that's the correct way

alt tracklists can't come fast enough

are any of the oc remixes as sat any more? or are they lal jsut attached ot mega releases now

they were litterally released as non-album tracks initially but alas