In this string of edits, someone added images and media types to pseudo-releases. I don’t think this is allowed/doesn’t make sense. What do you guys think?
Because those images and mediums have to come from somewhere “real”, and pseudo-releases aren’t real, and this could cause confusion when someone searches for a specific image for example, and the pseudo-track lists can be applied to multiple different releases through relationships.
2022-03-07 06659, 2022
cam1170 has quit
2022-03-07 06623, 2022
cam1170 joined the channel
2022-03-07 06642, 2022
cam1170 has quit
2022-03-07 06606, 2022
cam117012 joined the channel
2022-03-07 06623, 2022
cam117012 has quit
2022-03-07 06643, 2022
kepstin
i don't think media types are appropriate.
2022-03-07 06613, 2022
kepstin
having a front cover image shouldn't really be necessary, but i wouldn't refuse them - due to current tagging limitations it's nice to have a cover on them.
2022-03-07 06602, 2022
CatQuest
hopefully atl tracklists will be a thing Soon ™
2022-03-07 06606, 2022
CatQuest
alt even
2022-03-07 06607, 2022
cam1170 joined the channel
2022-03-07 06627, 2022
Lotheric
good thing there's a ™ on it!
2022-03-07 06639, 2022
Lotheric
:)
2022-03-07 06606, 2022
cam1170
Okay, since it seems like that’ll rely on “translated/transliterated” relationships, I’ll keep an eye on those, thanks
2022-03-07 06612, 2022
cam1170 has quit
2022-03-07 06602, 2022
cam1170 joined the channel
2022-03-07 06655, 2022
cam1170 has quit
2022-03-07 06643, 2022
otisolsen70 joined the channel
2022-03-07 06624, 2022
kepstin
(hmm, if the release group has the cover set correctly, there's probably no need to have a cover on pseudo-releases at all)
2022-03-07 06658, 2022
CatQuest
infact it could be hardcoded into picard that if type=pseudo-releases then coverart must be fetched by release group
