nadl40, it sounds like you have an ad or tracker blocker getting in the way. Try turning them off and see if that helps.
2023-03-15 07448, 2023
nirvdrum has quit
2023-03-15 07441, 2023
nadl40 has quit
2023-03-15 07439, 2023
nadl40 joined the channel
2023-03-15 07445, 2023
nadl40
rdswift thanks, it turns out that I had to reset the pass and the captcha messages were just distractions.
2023-03-15 07418, 2023
MeatPupp3t has quit
2023-03-15 07441, 2023
MeatPupp3t joined the channel
2023-03-15 07403, 2023
mrteach has quit
2023-03-15 07419, 2023
mrteach joined the channel
2023-03-15 07456, 2023
mrteach2 joined the channel
2023-03-15 07416, 2023
mrteach has quit
2023-03-15 07416, 2023
mrteach2 is now known as mrteach
2023-03-15 07410, 2023
delamons joined the channel
2023-03-15 07448, 2023
nirvdrum joined the channel
2023-03-15 07400, 2023
nirvdrum has quit
2023-03-15 07457, 2023
G0d joined the channel
2023-03-15 07410, 2023
Erin has quit
2023-03-15 07455, 2023
Erin joined the channel
2023-03-15 07452, 2023
reosarevok
nadl40: what was the bug? :)
2023-03-15 07441, 2023
otisolsen70 joined the channel
2023-03-15 07430, 2023
atj
did you manually create the recording? not sure how you'd specify that 2 tracks are the same when first importing and the recordings don't exist?
2023-03-15 07418, 2023
SothoTalKer has quit
2023-03-15 07403, 2023
SothoTalKer joined the channel
2023-03-15 07441, 2023
nadl40
reosarevok Release https://musicbrainz.org/release/21858f0d-c545-4c8… CD 07. Recordings 3,5,6 are linked to the same work. When I try to click on 'X' to remove the work rels on either side of th editor, ALL 3 instances of the relationship are highlighted for removal when 1 of them is correct. I would've
2023-03-15 07441, 2023
nadl40
expect to highlite only the recording that I've clicked on. Bug ?
atj: that's the point. I guess you're right that I could create the recording as standalone first.
2023-03-15 07436, 2023
reosarevok
Yeah, the only way to avoid that is adding a "standalone"
2023-03-15 07441, 2023
atj
i don't see how you can avoid that really
2023-03-15 07456, 2023
reosarevok
I mean, the editor could have a way to say "use the same new recording as for track 1"
2023-03-15 07406, 2023
reosarevok
But it's such an edge case, it's probably not worth it tbh
2023-03-15 07409, 2023
atj
the add release form is helping you by automatically creating the recordings, right?
2023-03-15 07444, 2023
atj
who is releasing something with the same track on it twice anyway? :)
2023-03-15 07458, 2023
reosarevok
Side A / Side B double side same song?
2023-03-15 07411, 2023
derwin
reosarevok: yeah.
2023-03-15 07448, 2023
atj
derwin: is this something i'd know about?
2023-03-15 07448, 2023
reosarevok
nadl40: that does seem like a bug. I wonder what happens if you submit it :)
2023-03-15 07405, 2023
reosarevok
derwin: is that "wow" as in "wow, I like this music and didn't know it was this" or "wow, that's shameless", or something else? :D Never heard of the artist
2023-03-15 07454, 2023
Cheezmo_
I run into that a lot with CD/Blu-ray releases. I just let it create the two recordings then merge them, or create one medium first give it a minute and then add the other medium using the recordings just made.
i use it when someone is credited with "recorded by" in the notes for a release, is that wrong?
2023-03-15 07458, 2023
reosarevok
No
2023-03-15 07400, 2023
reosarevok
That's the intenton
2023-03-15 07402, 2023
reosarevok
*intention
2023-03-15 07420, 2023
atj
well, I don't they're recording it to tape :P
2023-03-15 07425, 2023
atj
*I don't think
2023-03-15 07430, 2023
reosarevok
Yeah, I guess that might have been a biiiiit old fashioned of a description
2023-03-15 07400, 2023
GiM joined the channel
2023-03-15 07405, 2023
reosarevok
How would you word it?
2023-03-15 07411, 2023
GiM has quit
2023-03-15 07453, 2023
atj
"This describes an engineer responsible for committing the performance to tape or another recording medium. This can be as complex as setting up the microphones, amplifiers, and recording devices, or as simple as pressing the 'record' button on a 4-track or a digital audio workstation."
2023-03-15 07405, 2023
reosarevok
atj: sure, why not
2023-03-15 07438, 2023
reosarevok
Updated
2023-03-15 07458, 2023
reosarevok
nadl40: are you adding a ticket for that bug you found or should I? :) I don't think it's a known one, anyway
2023-03-15 07435, 2023
atj
jesus
2023-03-15 07421, 2023
Tom2015 has quit
2023-03-15 07404, 2023
balrog has quit
2023-03-15 07451, 2023
balrog joined the channel
2023-03-15 07415, 2023
nadl40 has quit
2023-03-15 07429, 2023
nadl40 joined the channel
2023-03-15 07441, 2023
ROpdebee joined the channel
2023-03-15 07426, 2023
nadl40
reosarevok I marked it for delete, then added the correct work rel to 1 recording and it's applying the new work to all 3 recordings, so this is a bug. Please create one, will be done properly
2023-03-15 07439, 2023
iconoclasthero joined the channel
2023-03-15 07452, 2023
nadl40 has quit
2023-03-15 07414, 2023
reosarevok
bitmap: ^ that's an unreported issue so far, right?
2023-03-15 07433, 2023
reosarevok
("Release https://musicbrainz.org/release/21858f0d-c545-4c8… CD 07. Recordings 3,5,6 are linked to the same work. When I try to click on 'X' to remove the work rels on either side of th editor, ALL 3 instances of the relationship are highlighted for removal when 1 of them is correct.")
2023-03-15 07434, 2023
bitmap
it might be the same issue as the one I was working on
2023-03-15 07452, 2023
bitmap
I can submit a fix now but didn't have time to finish writing a test
2023-03-15 07451, 2023
nirvdrum joined the channel
2023-03-15 07453, 2023
zer0bitz_ joined the channel
2023-03-15 07405, 2023
zer0bitz has quit
2023-03-15 07424, 2023
reosarevok
Can you test whether it solves that issue by hand at least? :)
2023-03-15 07449, 2023
reosarevok
We can always put the fix in beta, and then update it with the test after it's ready, if you don't think it makes things *worse* than accidentally removing extra rels :)
