for context, this record is actually a re-release of their first demo, but with a different cover and name
should I use the release date (2012) or the original one (1979)
I think it should go with the original one, but add some notes about being a re-release
also the cover is *chefs kiss*
antlarr
if it's a re-release, it should go with it's own release date and in the same release group of the original release
the cover is... interesting :)
eletrotupi
hm, should I add the demo as well then?
hm, yeah there's no info on that original demo
yayako
if you can't add the original release then at the least you can add a recording-place relationship to each recording with the studio and date?
eletrotupi
ok, yeah
I can't find the recording studio though
I don't think it even exists anymore, googling it responds with nothing useful
yayako
it seems like "Ambionic Sound Creative Master Recordings" may only be relevant to these recordings but it's still credited as such on both the vinyl and digital versions of this
even if that's the case I think you can just add the place itself when you're adding it to the recordings and just add the Discogs page for it as a link? I think that's reasonable