Is 'ova' in this title a preposition ? (I think it is)
Murdered Ova Nuttin’
ans should it be lowercased ?
3 word preposition should
~word/letter I mean
so I guess is what I'm asking: Murdered ova Nuttin’ (over) Murdered Ova Nuttin’ (hehe)
same question for 'Wit'
Rollin’ Wit da Rat Pak
and
in "Git Off Ma Dic", Off is considered part of the verb ? so capital ?
scrumplex has quit
scrumplex joined the channel
crism
Lotheric: Maybe obvious, but “wit” is “with” and “ova” is “over,” so capitalization should be the same as for the full word. I wouldn’t capitalize either one, but I often find I am at odds with the style guidelines in that respect. Try using proper English for the suggestion button, then putting it back?
the latter is already in the proper release group with all the other versions
LupinIII
[14:56] <crism> Lotheric: Maybe obvious, but “wit” is “with” and “ova” is “over,” so capitalization should be the same as for the full word. I wouldn’t capitalize either one, but I often find I am at odds with the style guidelines in that respect. Try using proper English for the suggestion button, then putting it back?
I alo tink with and over sohuld be lowercase in mb
as well as "from"
itit just looks *wrong* to capitalise them
the only reason for the exeption afaik si ambiguity in the "official english capitalisation rules" we got from some place
xnaas
oh, I see I can submit a "remove" edit. don't mind me...
xnaas has left the channel
LupinIII
your example actually illustrates it nicely. "ove" is "ova" a 3 letter suc wnad would ,with the ambiguity be considered lowercase
ova*
erh
your example actually illustrates it nicely. "over" is "ova" a 3 letter such word would, without the ambiguity, be considered lowercase
Lotheric
maybe the guidelines can be changed... What do you think reosarevok ?
the capitalization of with varies from style guide to style guide
antonmosich joined the channel
lolek1 joined the channel
xarph joined the channel
minimal joined the channel
antonmosich has quit
zer0bitz_ joined the channel
zer0bitz has quit
logistic-bot has quit
logistic-bot joined the channel
lolek1 has quit
logistic-bot has quit
logistic-bot1 joined the channel
logistic-bot1 has quit
logistic-bot joined the channel
logistic-bot has quit
logistic-bot joined the channel
adhawkins has quit
adhawkins joined the channel
sentriz has quit
sentriz joined the channel
atj
nice to see discussions about English grammar using examples such as "Murdered Ova Nuttin’" and "Git Off Ma Dic"
it's like being at school again
Lotheric
you know... hip hop lol
not the finest English
reosarevok
atj: but is it a grammar school?
(I still don't know what that even means :D)
I dunno. Changing it would mean a ton of stuff would now be incorrect, which seems annoying :)
atj
Lotheric: i'm not judging the English, i just liked the juxtaposition ;)
i agree. if there was one clear rule then possibly, but if it's ambiguous it's not worth the effort / disruption etc.
and even then
iconoclast_hero has quit
balrog has quit
balrog joined the channel
Lotheric
I don't care on way or the other, like I said English is not my native language so weeing "With" with a capital doesn't have that shock effect of being wrong
~seeing
but I can understand the annoyance
treasoN has quit
treasoN joined the channel
treasoN has quit
treasoN joined the channel
treasoN has quit
treasoN joined the channel
treasoN has quit
treasoN joined the channel
treasoN has quit
kellnerd
Is there any clever way to add a missing medium #1 to an existing release with many other media which are already in the correct position?
Because if I add e new medium and move it upwards using the arrow buttons, each of the exisiting medium gets its medium number incremented.
So for a release with the highest medium number being 23, it requires almost 2*23 clicks to get the medium into the correct position.
And unfortunately medium #1 is not the only one which is missing :/
bitmap
you can play around with MB.releaseEditor.rootField.release().mediums()[n].position(1)
kellnerd
So if there is a hack (including JS execution in the browser console) to achieve this more easily than creating a duplicate release with the missing media only to merge it., let me know.
bitmap
as long as the edit previews look ok, it should be fine
kellnerd
Thanks bitmap, I will try that :)
treasoN joined the channel
logistic-bot has quit
Cool, looking good, I guess I will submit the first medium separately to see that it works before entering more data.
Superb, using `MB.releaseEditor.rootField.release().mediums().at(-1).position(1)` I don't even have to calculate the index of the newly added last medium :D
bitmap
😎
treasoN has quit
treasoN joined the channel
treasoN has quit
treasoN joined the channel
___nick___ joined the channel
___nick___ has quit
treasoN has quit
___nick___ joined the channel
Awlex joined the channel
Awlex
Hi, I'm a bit new to this so I might ask a couple of questions today and tomorrow