#musicbrainz

/

      • zayd has quit
      • scrumplex_ has quit
      • scrumplex joined the channel
      • Jigen joined the channel
      • LupinIII has quit
      • mven9713 has quit
      • LupinIII joined the channel
      • Goemon joined the channel
      • Jigen has quit
      • LupinIII has quit
      • mven9713 joined the channel
      • user23 has quit
      • ApeKattQuest joined the channel
      • ApeKattQuest has quit
      • ApeKattQuest joined the channel
      • Vacuity has quit
      • Vacuity joined the channel
      • shakethedisease joined the channel
      • zoedivision[m]
        has there been any thought, discussion, or consensus on specifying track lengths on vinyl media where it's not listed on the packaging? IIRC discogs's policy is you don't enter it, maybe until or unless you've played and timed them. Which seems logical to me. Cuz I've encountered one scenario with an album where I got into the official web release of an album, and then finally decided to rip the LP version, and found out some of
      • the tracks had been shortened to fit vinyl 😭
      • So it seems better to me not to just assume the vinyl lengths are the same as other versions.
      • (actually I suppose this should extend to any analog medium, haha)
      • dseomn has quit
      • dseomn joined the channel
      • derwin
        zoedivision[m]: in general, I'm tagging files, which have durations.
      • d4rkie has quit
      • d4rkie joined the channel
      • zoedivision[m]
        so you have the vinyl rips and can verify the lengths
      • erofen[m] joined the channel
      • erofen[m]
      • the remix albums should be separate
      • Highstrung[m] joined the channel
      • Highstrung[m]
        I agree with this. If you don't have track lengths from either a rip or the sleeve, don't assume they're the same as another release.
      • sp1ff joined the channel
      • mven97135 joined the channel
      • mven9713 has quit
      • mven97135 is now known as mven9713
      • relaxo[m]
        UltraFuzzy (IRC) exactly for that. Not an iTunes user here so can not tell about that. But for me it is enough to keep the basic tags and the embedded cover art. I use the files to hear music from usb in my car.
      • UltraFuzzy
        Can someone ELI5 the meaning of the gold disc with the red asterisk status icon? I don't understand what this part of the description in the docs means: "and that the information for the release has been modified"
      • reosarevok[m]
        I guess the point is that there is some changes to the tags to save? :)
      • UltraFuzzy
        ok, the confusion was that it was giving me the asterisk because I had additional tags but I also had 'Clear existing tags' turned off so it wasn't showing me those additional tags
      • wait no, that wasn't it, every time I reload files back into Picard it still gives me the asterisk, is that just how it is when you add files?
      • reosarevok[m]
        I guess if there's some tags that are not getting saved they might always show as different? Bob Swift or zas would know
      • UltraFuzzy
        So it is possible to load in files and get a clean golden disc without pressing save?
      • rinsuki[m] joined the channel
      • rinsuki[m]
        I think you can just create new release group and move release to new one
      • naxay07[m]
        [UltraFuzzy (IRC)](https://matrix.to/#/@irc_UltraFuzzy:chatbrainz.org) Golden disk means you have all the tracks in that release. It's possible to load files without any tags and get a golden disc (e.g. acoustid matching)
      • It's still possible to get an asterisk (unsaved changes) even for tracks you just saved. I don't really know why that happens, windows Explorer might be doing something that breaks 1:1 match confidence of picard or it's just server side has been changed so there really are new changes
      • tagomago joined the channel
      • anonn joined the channel
      • Island has quit