But is the information at least correct? I hate ai articles that hallucinate that one function you want but don't actually exist
2025-09-25 26803, 2025
PaulDOkno[m]
Ah I said I did review the readme, there is currently an issue with the db user search path not being set correctly. But that's my mistake and I a fixing this myself as we speak :) no IA involved
2025-09-25 26841, 2025
SothoTalKer has quit
2025-09-25 26852, 2025
PaulDOkno[m]
By the way [@_discord_492790468321607681:chatbrainz.org](https://matrix.to/#/@_discord_492790468321607681:chatbrainz.org) I have successfully used musicbrainz–rs to get metadata for my personnal scrobbler. Just wanted to say thank you for keeping that alive :)
2025-09-25 26848, 2025
SothoTalKer joined the channel
2025-09-25 26816, 2025
furq has quit
2025-09-25 26814, 2025
furq joined the channel
2025-09-25 26826, 2025
rustynova[m]
Well I need it too so of course I'll work on it.
2025-09-25 26826, 2025
rustynova[m]
Although I am in full analysis paralysis on that crate. It's pretty annoying to not have any way to set request priority, or merge the same requests while they are waiting for the rate limit... But rust doesn't have a good way to do multi polling task queue processing that isn't just "yeet it in a tokio::spawn()"...
2025-09-25 26832, 2025
furq has quit
2025-09-25 26848, 2025
furq joined the channel
2025-09-25 26843, 2025
PaulDOkno[m]
you probably need the "futures" crate to be able to join async task in a runtime agnostic way.
