hello! is there any conventions on labels used on digital releases where that label only releases records of a single artist? does that count as self released? there's no info on the label other than that it's credited on deezer/spotify etc so I'm assuming it's more like a wrapper for self-releasing than an actual label
G0d has quit
elomatreb[m]
cleanus: that's often a matter of judgement. If it's a label with a consistent (and useful) name, and you feel like adding it, then you can do that. If not, `[no label]` is probably fine too
labels where it's obvious that `[no label]` should be used are things like the DistroKid labels which consist of something like "DK <a bunch of numbers>"
cleanus
allright, thank you!
cleanus has quit
ijc has left the channel
G0d joined the channel
ZaphodBeeblebrox joined the channel
adhawkins has quit
alexrelis joined the channel
PelvicSorcery joined the channel
MRiddickW joined the channel
ItsPizzaTime1501 has quit
PelvicSorcery
Why do I keep finding the random one off version of a release that no one else has entered?
Okay, this is weird. I'm trying to import the discogs for the album, and I'm getting this warning when I do so. "This label/catalog number pair already exists."
How do I search for that pairing?
adhawkins joined the channel
elomatreb[m]
PelvicSorcery: https://musicbrainz.org/search, select "advanced query syntax" and search for a release, search string: `label:"labelname" AND catno:"Catalog number"`
PelvicSorcery
I tried it with and without the backticks and I just get a server error. `label:"Maverick" AND catno:"R2-532153"`
And then I tried it with the link you provided instead of the one I had open, and I get no results found.
elomatreb[m]
Without the backticks
but that should work
PelvicSorcery
The results were the same. On the original search I did I got an error both ways, and then using your link I got no results.
