wow, "A release that was created without any participation from the credited artist (e.g. a remix or mashup album that was created without the knowledge of the original artist(s)) should be credited to the artist who created and released it (the remix or mashup artist) instead of to the original artist.
2023-05-04 12441, 2023
derwin
this changes a looooooooooootttttt of stuff I've tagged in the past
2023-05-04 12436, 2023
derwin
oh, wait, that's only for *releases* ... not recordings, wow, weird.
2023-05-04 12441, 2023
derwin
so .. the mis-credited release I'm talking about...
2023-05-04 12449, 2023
derwin
one of the wrong track titles is straight up an error " 5 listed as "Back To Chicago"
back to chicago is a different song from Manhattan Melody
2023-05-04 12438, 2023
derwin
I'm struggling to see the alternate titles on this compilation as anything other than "guy at the record company was too lazy/careless to get the actual track titles right" https://www.discogs.com/release/142226-Various-Ki…
derwin: Not crediting the original artist makes sense when it’s egregious rip offs/bootlegs imo, just in terms of keeping artists discographies clean. I believe that was the reason for the exception
2023-05-04 12447, 2023
Cheezmo_ has quit
2023-05-04 12421, 2023
Cheezmo joined the channel
2023-05-04 12403, 2023
derwin
yeah, I don't really know if "keeping artists discographies clean" is something I actually care abou? why is it ok for their recordings to be unclean but not their releases? because few people look at recordings, I guess?
2023-05-04 12451, 2023
Cheezmo has quit
2023-05-04 12412, 2023
Cheezmo_ joined the channel
2023-05-04 12429, 2023
aerozol
derwin: because nobody raises an issue regarding recordings, would be my guess
2023-05-04 12401, 2023
aerozol
Even without the ‘cleanliness’ I don’t know if it makes sense to credit an artist that really had zero to do with a ‘release’ (e.g. bootleg remixes). But they definitely had something to with the recording. I suppose that’s still possible with official releases that the artist might hate the remix, if they’re on a crap label that doesn’t ask them about stuff 🤔
2023-05-04 12422, 2023
aerozol
*might hate the remix release
2023-05-04 12439, 2023
raemac joined the channel
2023-05-04 12456, 2023
derwin
do I understand correctly that "Edit of" shouldn't be used for what people in the disco scene call "edits" which are actually "bootleg remixes" ?
2023-05-04 12407, 2023
derwin
I've been using "edit of" / "edited by" for edits which don't add additional instruments, and "remix of" / "remixed by" for edits which do, in general?
2023-05-04 12443, 2023
derwin
but maybe I shouldn't be using "edit of" at all, for anything but official edits, like radio edits?
2023-05-04 12424, 2023
derwin
or, more broadly, "edit of/by" for things that ... call themselves "edit"
2023-05-04 12448, 2023
G0d joined the channel
2023-05-04 12451, 2023
raemac has quit
2023-05-04 12405, 2023
ttpcodes has quit
2023-05-04 12407, 2023
ttpcodes joined the channel
2023-05-04 12424, 2023
petitminion joined the channel
2023-05-04 12428, 2023
texke has quit
2023-05-04 12446, 2023
petitminion has quit
2023-05-04 12406, 2023
aerozol
derwin: Hopefully someone else can answer that because I have no business talking about remixes vs edits when it comes to electronic music :D
2023-05-04 12453, 2023
derwin
technically speaking, IMO a "remix" should require stems. but most people don't use the term "remix" that way in practice.
2023-05-04 12452, 2023
derwin
if it were up to me, people would call :
2023-05-04 12414, 2023
derwin
- an edit/re-arrangement with no additional instruments added an "edit"
2023-05-04 12445, 2023
derwin
- a version with or without additional instruments, with or without permission, from stems, a "remix"
2023-05-04 12456, 2023
derwin
- a remix with permission an "official remix"
2023-05-04 12407, 2023
derwin
- a remix without permission a "bootleg remix"
2023-05-04 12417, 2023
derwin
- the acapella vocal from one track over the instrumental of another track a "blend"
2023-05-04 12424, 2023
derwin
- two or more tracks combined together with the intent of both being very identifiable a "mashup"
2023-05-04 12401, 2023
derwin
- a sequence of multiple tracks transitioned between in short order a "megamix"
2023-05-04 12439, 2023
derwin
- pretty much everything else a "flip" or just an original track with a sample
2023-05-04 12448, 2023
derwin
- a version of the original with much less vocal a "dub"
2023-05-04 12430, 2023
derwin
- a version of the original with no vocal an "instrumental" and no beat an "acapella" (obviously, lol)
when scan is used in Picard does it only look at the acoustic fingerprint or does it look at other metadata, file name, etc?
2023-05-04 12451, 2023
yvanzo
iconoclasthero: only the acoustic fingerprint
2023-05-04 12402, 2023
yvanzo
Using “Lookup” make use of existing metadata and file name.
2023-05-04 12429, 2023
Rob joined the channel
2023-05-04 12453, 2023
Rob is now known as Guest1853
2023-05-04 12401, 2023
Guest1853
Anyone have issues connecting MB docker's db in WSL2? I have the port exposed. From within the docker I can connect to the DB. but from outside of it, I can't. ufw etc are no active.
2023-05-04 12429, 2023
iconoclasthero
thanks, i have a FUBAR CD rip that I'm trying to figure out what's what and some of it may be mistagged.
2023-05-04 12426, 2023
Maxr1998 has quit
2023-05-04 12443, 2023
Maxr1998 joined the channel
2023-05-04 12403, 2023
iconoclasthero has quit
2023-05-04 12459, 2023
duncan joined the channel
2023-05-04 12444, 2023
yvanzo
Hi Guest1853, WSL2 is not supported yet, but any help to support it is welcome :)
2023-05-04 12440, 2023
yvanzo
Otherwise VirtualBox is known to work.
2023-05-04 12403, 2023
yvanzo
Guest1853: Also 'exposing' port is not 'publishing' port in Docker Compose.
yvanzo I did publish the port with admin/configure add publishing-all-ports
2023-05-04 12434, 2023
Guest1853
err sorry, i did this one: admin/configure add publishing-db-port
2023-05-04 12424, 2023
yvanzo
Then it's an issue specific to Docker on WSL2 which I'm unable to help with.
2023-05-04 12421, 2023
kellnerd has quit
2023-05-04 12441, 2023
outsidecontext
iconoclast: to be exact, Picard uses only the fingerprint to do a lookup against AcoustId. But when there are multiple results (multiple linked recordings or even multiple AcoustIds) it does the same metadata comparison that is being used for selecting between multiple MB lookup results
2023-05-04 12423, 2023
atticf has quit
2023-05-04 12416, 2023
Guest1853 has quit
2023-05-04 12421, 2023
pixelpenguin joined the channel
2023-05-04 12447, 2023
atticf joined the channel
2023-05-04 12455, 2023
adhawkins has quit
2023-05-04 12413, 2023
dseomn has quit
2023-05-04 12425, 2023
raemac has quit
2023-05-04 12452, 2023
otisolsen70 has quit
2023-05-04 12405, 2023
petitminion joined the channel
2023-05-04 12428, 2023
petitminion has quit
2023-05-04 12426, 2023
kellnerd joined the channel
2023-05-04 12431, 2023
petitminion joined the channel
2023-05-04 12449, 2023
adhawkins joined the channel
2023-05-04 12448, 2023
petitminion has quit
2023-05-04 12453, 2023
anonn joined the channel
2023-05-04 12420, 2023
anonn has quit
2023-05-04 12430, 2023
G0d has quit
2023-05-04 12439, 2023
derwin
An admin has a problem. He thinks "I'll use Docker." Now he has two problems.
