ok whoever did alchemist 2 did it weird and it's ruining my brain rn
2024-10-14 28851, 2024
zoedivision[m]
yeah it looks super weird lmao
2024-10-14 28802, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
on the one without the (2) it LINKS to a recording ***WITH*** a (2) but it's A DIFFERENT RECORDING
2024-10-14 28803, 2024
zoedivision[m]
one of those MB-ian things that's easy to muck up and hard to fix haha
2024-10-14 28828, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
hard to fix is an understatement
2024-10-14 28834, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
which recording set gets kept?
2024-10-14 28838, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
oh dear and this is after afro tried to fix it
2024-10-14 28850, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
it used to be worse
2024-10-14 28824, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
afro is one of those listeners where i feel like every song ive heard is a subset of what theyve heard and they have way more
2024-10-14 28826, 2024
zoedivision[m]
well for a start I see that some of the recordings have ISRCs attached and some don't........ I'd merge into the one with ISRC
2024-10-14 28834, 2024
zoedivision[m]
but that might mean renaming later lol
2024-10-14 28838, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
idk man i might just not touch this
2024-10-14 28850, 2024
zoedivision[m]
if you don't listen to him / this release, I wouldn't 😹
2024-10-14 28853, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
i do
2024-10-14 28843, 2024
orangebot
Sorry to butt in, what's the best way to define a cover of a "recording"? Would the cover be considered a "recording"?
2024-10-14 28824, 2024
zoedivision[m]
not sure i follow
2024-10-14 28826, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
apparently this release is a war znoe
2024-10-14 28828, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
s/znoe/zone/
2024-10-14 28805, 2024
zoedivision[m]
not to be cheeky, but if it's been recorded, that's a recording
2024-10-14 28807, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
the (2)s got added and removed like twice
2024-10-14 28856, 2024
orangebot
Agreed, I'm just having trouble marking the relationship type
2024-10-14 28820, 2024
zoedivision[m]
oh I got you
2024-10-14 28846, 2024
zoedivision[m]
if you're creating a cover relationship, it's going to be Recording (the cover) -> Work (what they covered)
2024-10-14 28807, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
you think using the ones with ISRC would make sense to merge into?
2024-10-14 28832, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
at this point after reading the history i'm not entirely convinced there needs to be a merge when i could swear i had a firm opinion 5 minutes ago...
2024-10-14 28843, 2024
orangebot
Yeah, I saw that with a few other songs I was using as reference. The trouble is that the song being covered is considered a "recording", so I can't use a cover-type relationship.
2024-10-14 28846, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
ok you know what? hopefully this becomes votable and if no one likes it it'll just get voted down
2024-10-14 28829, 2024
zoedivision[m]
I'm pretty sure that sort of edit isn't an auto-edit, but you can check 'enable voting on all edits' just to be sure.
2024-10-14 28851, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
this is gonna be a huge waste of time if downvoted
i have " Update the recording title to match the track title." off but in the edit note it seems to add the (2)s
2024-10-14 28809, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
> well for a start I see that some of the recordings have ISRCs attached and some don't........ I'd merge into the one with ISRC
2024-10-14 28809, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
apparently the reasoning behind the split to begin with was ISRCs
2024-10-14 28829, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
but i dont quite get it, i still dont think having separate recordings for the same actual audio makes sense at all
2024-10-14 28841, 2024
zoedivision[m]
yeah that's pretty weird.
2024-10-14 28846, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
maybe it's an editor bug?
2024-10-14 28810, 2024
duckfromdisc[m] uploaded an image: (5KiB) < https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/download/chatbrainz.org/cIfVclMqCkFJLWKMkMmFvdeC/image.png >
2024-10-14 28817, 2024
duckfromdisc[m] uploaded an image: (18KiB) < https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/download/chatbrainz.org/MfKhFRGvGQCJPSdcPVMUOdoo/image.png >
2024-10-14 28837, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
that title should remain and i wonder if it would after the actual edit happens
2024-10-14 28830, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
OK i see, it's tracklist vs recordings
2024-10-14 28857, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
but yeah, i don't see why ISRCs should decide that
2024-10-14 28811, 2024
zoedivision[m]
@orangebot, yes it appears (at a quick glance) that nobody's yet created a Work for that particular recording
2024-10-14 28811, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
maybe that was just the release and not the tracks having the barcode thing
2024-10-14 28829, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
look ill just hit submit and at worst i lost ~15 min time i couldve been doing homework
2024-10-14 28805, 2024
orangebot
Ah, ok. Then I've just got to make a work for it.
2024-10-14 28856, 2024
zoedivision[m]
yep (:
2024-10-14 28803, 2024
zoedivision[m]
very cool song by the way (the original)
2024-10-14 28848, 2024
user03 joined the channel
2024-10-14 28851, 2024
zoedivision[m]
very similar in aesthetic to some of Haruomi Hosono's synth projects
2024-10-14 28833, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
let's see how this goes
2024-10-14 28819, 2024
orangebot
I actually have not heard the original yet. Just ran into the cover I linked earlier today.
2024-10-14 28822, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
so do these recordings get deleted?
2024-10-14 28833, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
if the edit passes, the ones that were "duplicates"
2024-10-14 28836, 2024
steering joined the channel
2024-10-14 28842, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
otherwise someone's gonna have to add a disambig to each of these recordings and it's not gonna be me
2024-10-14 28857, 2024
zoedivision[m]
if you merged that's non-destructive
2024-10-14 28833, 2024
duckfromdisc[m]
i have a feeling im gonna get downvoted here
2024-10-14 28819, 2024
user03 has quit
2024-10-14 28848, 2024
minimal has quit
2024-10-14 28818, 2024
orangebot
Oh boy, I think I'm over complicating this for myself. It's been half an hour and I'm 4 Wikipedia articles deep on what a "raga" is to make sure the "type" is correct for this work.