#metabrainz

woah. hell just froze over. ;)

In the meantime I worked on some parts of mb android and decided on a few things there

Majority of my time was spent working on some MB stuff where I was fixing small issues on my work and PR

I made some contributions to LB as well and reviewed some great PRs

fin. That's it for me! Go Freso

ruaok: good candidate for fixing mapping there, only 1 track from the whole album matched

🙋

alastairp: is the album in MB?

I mostly spent time on our resident harasser last week, but I also did prod some other reports etc. and was around and about. Looks like they’ve lowered their activity quite a bit.

fin, I guess.

Which wraps up reviews. Thanks everyone who gave a review. :)

Freso: great news!

ruaok: it may not have been at the moment that it was playing 🤦 (sorry for interrupting meeting notes)

Oh, and also: it’s my birthday Wednesday; I may or may not be around Thursday. :x

Anyway.

🎉

A couple of items on the agenda.

alastairp: that looks like it should've gotten mapped. I'll have a look.

hi all!

CatQuest said they’d done some. Anyone else? :)

I opened the summit notes on wednesday! not sure how I never got around to adding anything :(

!m CatQuest

You're doing good work, CatQuest!

:)

alastairp: :p

thanks CatQuest

oh. *etnika vs Etnika.

not sure what typesense will think of that...

oh, interesting. AC vs Artist name vs whatever spotify cays

Freso: put some stuff on your bandcamp wishlist :x

lucifer: Anything else to add, or should we move on? :)

let's add more notes -> tickets this week. fin

maybe we could put an effort into it this week

Just in case: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MdK9y1fSa5A...

Great, thanks. :)

to stop it dragging out weeks and weeks

yvanzo: GSoC 2022

gus. i will mark the ones I intend on doing. you gous d othe ones i don't know how t odo

guys*

fwiw, i took look into those again and many of those are now done :D

After a limited GSoC 2021, here are great news for 2022: https://opensource.googleblog.com/2021/11/expan...

Briefly, a lot more flexibility.

Everyone can apply, not just students.

those new options do look very cool and usefull for us

Yup!

Two possible sizes of projects: like 2021 or like before.

Interesting.

it'll be interesting to see how this affects the application pool

The timetable can go up to 22 weeks if needed.

but still only 350 hours at 22 weeks?

Yes.

also - small and large projects (175/350)

Indeed :)

The whole thing seems exciting

Especially that you can expand it in time and do less stuff each week, so people can do it and also have a holiday or an internship or whatever

That’s all. I just wanted to share good news, so admins, mentors and candidates can project further. :)

I also think the extra flexibility is great. Nice of the GSoC team to listen to our feedback :)

Thank you yvanzo :)

I'd like to add that it means we'll need to think of potential projects for both sizes

I was going to also talk about the harasser, but given that their activity seems to be slowing down, I’m going to hold off until next week to see how it develops over this week.

So that wraps up this meeting.

Thank you everyone for your time. Stay safe out there! :)

</BANG>

Thank you!

[musicbrainz-server] 14reosarevok merged pull request #2312 (03master…MBS-12034): MBS-12034: Require confirmation to enter a "Disc n" medium title https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-serve...

[musicbrainz-server] 14reosarevok merged pull request #2327 (03master…MBS-12055): MBS-12055: Allow admins to see private editor-editor subscriptions https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-serve...

Thanks Freso !

monkey: LB-1020

LB-1020: Timestamp on listens page for midday shows 0 not 12 https://tickets.metabrainz.org/browse/LB-1020

Gah !

More timestamp issues, what a surprise !

Thanks for reporting

alastairp: re https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-serv... , i tested and see the issue in sentry. eg: https://sentry.metabrainz.org/organizations/met...

also the user is shown a generic message

yvanzo: https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-serve... can you check that comment for a sec?

I'd suggest merging as-is for now

lucifer: 👍 cool

that's because our API error handler swallows actual exception text?

right

perfect, thanks for confirming

cc reosarevok: thanks bitmap for the answer.

uhm. why is my last listens a month ago https://listenbrainz.org/user/CatCat/ I just imported again now

what am i doing wrong

CatQuest: are you using the Last.FM importer? do you get any errors while importing?

no errors

uccessfully submitted 1 listens to ListenBrainz

Thank you for using ListenBrainz!

i see. i'll look into it. what's your Last.FM user name?

https://www.last.fm/user/Nasasie seems up to date

yvanzo, bitmap: I'll merge that and release :)

[musicbrainz-server] 14reosarevok merged pull request #2331 (03master…mbs-12079): MBS-12079: JSON-LD for releases with a lot of [silence] is too big https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-serve...

Thanks!

reosarevok: make sure to deploy latest changes to docker-server-configs on both serge and zappa beforehand.

it oddly tells me that scrobble has submitted "55 minutes from now"

idk what it means

yvanzo: does that mean anything else than "make sure your docker-server-configs repo is up to date"?

I don't normally actively deploy the repo

probably looks like an LFM issue with timezones, CatQuest

reosarevok: just pull the latest master, to get changes from #190.

huh. i can't chnage thme because lfm has locked me out of changing anything :/

not sure why LB import is not working as expected though.

really wish i coudl jsut submit directly to lb

yea

reosarevok: I can do that

I'd except everything up until a n hour's working fien because of weirdness

I'm going to eat dinner/finish tidying the bathroom

reosarevok: done

Thanks!

That makes me think we need a script to massively update docker-server-configs clones.

[listenbrainz-server] 14amCap1712 merged pull request #1694 (03master…api-validation): Fix errors returned by API compat for invalid listens https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-serv...

Probably wouldn't hurt

yvanzo, bitmap:

Did the new code change the way I'm supposed to do this?

reosarevok: no, that is more likely a bug in the deployment script.

bitmap: around? :)

bug found

[bookbrainz-site] 14dependabot[bot] opened pull request #717 (03master…dependabot/npm_and_yarn/webpack-5.64.2): chore(deps-dev): bump webpack from 5.12.3 to 5.64.2 https://github.com/bookbrainz/bookbrainz-site/p...

[bookbrainz-site] 14dependabot[bot] closed pull request #716 (03master…dependabot/npm_and_yarn/webpack-5.64.1): chore(deps-dev): bump webpack from 5.12.3 to 5.64.1 https://github.com/bookbrainz/bookbrainz-site/p...

yvanzo: can you deploy straight to master and I'll merge again?

Or I guess I can take a quick look if you open a PR

I found the bug, not the fix.

The problem is that services are registered with local ports (specified in scripts/constants.sh) not with 5000.

Ooooh

So we'd need to have some endpoint in a known port that returns the port for a specific service or?

No, just to pass arguments differently and to source scripts/constants.sh

Gimme one night to think about it :)

Ok, maybe bitmap will fix it in the meantime, and if not you can :)

We can release in the morning

[listenbrainz-server] 14amCap1712 merged pull request #1696 (03master…api-tests): Improve validation of listen submission https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-serv...

[listenbrainz-server] 14amCap1712 merged pull request #1733 (03master…api-tests-payload-list): Validate that payload in submission json is a list https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-serv...

importing new listen dump to spark complete now.

very good.

monkey, lucifer, alastairp : https://listenbrainz.org/user/alastairp/?min_ts...

I haven't done anything at all -- I was writing the debugger as to why this didn't match.