#metabrainz

[musicbrainz-android] 14dependabot[bot] opened pull request #255 (03dev…dependabot/gradle/dev/com.android.application-8.7.2): Bump com.android.application from 8.5.1 to 8.7.2 https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-andro...

[musicbrainz-android] 14dependabot[bot] closed pull request #253 (03dev…dependabot/gradle/dev/com.android.application-8.6.1): Bump com.android.application from 8.5.1 to 8.6.1 https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-andro...

[musicbrainz-android] 14dependabot[bot] opened pull request #256 (03dev…dependabot/gradle/dev/com.google.devtools.ksp-2.0.21-1.0.26): Bump com.google.devtools.ksp from 2.0.0-1.0.24 to 2.0.21-1.0.26 https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-andro...

[musicbrainz-android] 14dependabot[bot] closed pull request #254 (03dev…dependabot/gradle/dev/com.google.devtools.ksp-2.0.20-1.0.25): Bump com.google.devtools.ksp from 2.0.0-1.0.24 to 2.0.20-1.0.25 https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-andro...

thuna: I don't know specifics about foobar2000's scripting, but they do have documentation at https://wiki.hydrogenaud.io/index.php?title=Foo... .

The part about Boolean values is not totally clear, but from the descriptions it seems to me that both 0 and an empty value are considered false, everything else true

That would be different from Picard, where empty values are considered false, everything else true

[listenbrainz-server] 14MonkeyDo merged pull request #3019 (03master…LB-1664): LB-1664: Only show "full discography" button when required https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-serv...

[listenbrainz-server] 14amCap1712 merged pull request #2988 (03donation-flairs…donors-with-flairs): Add an endpoint to get all donors with flairs https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-serv...

outsidecontext[m: That documentation was what confused me, yes. My reading of that text is that each function has an implicit boolean value that is distinct from the string that it returns. https://hydrogenaud.io/index.php/topic,45949.ms... seems to support that, but the logic each funtion uses is afaict completely undocumented, and I don't have foobar2000 (or time) at hand to test it all

Folks, I've begun filling in missing info for Slint's works (https://musicbrainz.org/artist/2869c510-2679-4a...) following the instruction "You must select a relationship type and target entity for every relationship" when adding a new work.

Initially I set Slint the band as the writer (e.g. https://musicbrainz.org/work/f49e0d2f-b65c-4496...) which put the work into their list, but I've just added https://musicbrainz.org/work/e27d56e5-936d-4e9e... setting the individual members as writers (info from ISWCnet) and that work didn't go into Slint's list of works.

Is there a way out of this without me cancelling and redoing these edits?

(I think redoing them may work due to Slint being automatically set as the artist with no relationship type, which doesn't seem possible to do after the work has been added.)

it'll show up in their works list once it's linked to a recording, e.g. once https://musicbrainz.org/edit/117516596 passes

Oh wonderful, thanks!

aerozol: i think the permissions may need to be updated on the summit notes doc linked from https://blog.metabrainz.org/2024/10/30/metabrai... -- https://docs.google.com/document/d/18SnpJBp8VDb... prompts me to request access

derat: ah crap, I might just remove the link from the blog post actually. Mainly because I can’t see how to set the permissions for the public to view the doc but all MeB staff to be able to edit (Google searching hasn’t offered a good solution, which isn’t promising), but also because the blog post has everything from the notes in it, I believe.

<aerozol[m]1> "derat: ah crap, I might just..." <- It should be general access > anyone with the link > viewer, and the existing permissions stay as they are?