#metabrainz

<lucifer[m]> "holycow23: did you remove the..." <- No just pulled down spark nothing else

My bad just changed namenode wasn't up, but I think we should change the error message then to, namenode not available?

holycow23: i think its an issue from the hdfs library that we use to communicate with the namenode, instead of returning the actual connection error its returning a PathNotFoundError.

(which is caught by our code and presented again as a PathNotFoundError)

Okay

I did try generating stats but seems like they are wrong, so need to verify that

lucifer: Yeah i can see that track! i also uploaded one more track it showing uploaded but its not showing to me?

is fw server running i'm getting

`500 Internal Server Error`

if a user disable fw then i need to delete tokens, should i also delete the fw_servers; or should i keep in db if any user uses same host_url then we dont need to create new oauth?

m.amanullah7: don't delete the fw server. but just the token.

which api are you calling that returns the 500 error?

as for why your track is not showing up, i don't know for sure but my hunch is that if you tag it with Picard it will probably show up.

i looked into it and fixed the issue. i think its an issue with funkwhale backend opening too many database cnnections.

Jade @jade:ellis.link: reosarevok: julian45 @julian45:julian45.net: I don't really see a problem from any perspective in regards to skipping making a forum thread - far more people vote than post in the forum thread. I think it's probably a better flow anyway to have a community celebration notice *after* the auto auditor has been voted in - maybe we prompt the user to do that after the election has finished? Or we (I or Reo) do it?

aerozol: the point of the thread though is that without that there's no way to know *why* the editor is being proposed :) It might even be a mistake :D

So it's not that people have to reply, it's just good to know

I figure that people should take the time look into the editor themselves anyway? But maybe you're right. If we have a text block for the proposer to add, that could work

I guess it's the "discussion" part that I don't really think is used. Nobody wants to say anything mean about someone who might be an auto editor soon 😜

I dunno, back in the day people did say mean things! :D

I think the community has mellowed though

In the old days some people would very openly say "look at this and this edit, they're shit, this person doesn't seem ready" :)

Haha, good times! I've ventured into the occasional bit of critical feedback but I don't know if I've ever seen anyone else do it. In my time

lucifer: Sure i'll keep funkwhale_servers;

I don't really see the downside of posting a thread

It's not particularly harder than the sending an email bit

lucifer: ```Page not found

404: Release group mbid 5e28c5b7-43ef-4c21-9506-e8a080bd6fad not found in the metadata cache

```

s/```/\`\`\`/, s///

* lucifer:... (full message at <https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/...>)

lucifer: Its working fine now i guess i'm getting this response... (full message at <https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/...>)

hwy lucifer just updated my code based on your suggestion and this is the log of my `runner.py` file see in the screenshot and also i have pushed the latest changes so you can have a look and update me if any changes needed also the tables are fine i have checked u can see here also ```txt... (full message at <https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/...>)

* hwy lucifer just updated my code based on your suggestion and this is the log of my `runner.py` file see in the screenshot and also i have pushed the latest changes so you can have a look and update me if any changes needed also the tables are fine i have checked u can see here also ```txt... (full message at <https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/...>)

* hey lucifer just updated my code based on your suggestion and this is the log of my `runner.py` file see in the screenshot and also i have pushed the latest changes on my pr so you can have a look and update me if any changes needed also the tables are fine i have checked u can see here also `txt... (full message at <https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/...>)

lucifer: backend is working fine as of now!... (full message at <https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/...>)

m.amanullah7: cool sounds good.

rayyan_seliya123: i'll review the PR again and let you know

<lucifer[m]> "rayyan_seliya123: i'll review..." <- Sure

lucifer what should i put in the metadata of background_tasks

rn i am just putting import_id (id of the import user data task) only

should i add something else also or should i let it be as other details can be obtained from the import_id only?