[lucifer](https://matrix.to/#/@lucifer:chatbrainz.org)not urgent, but it looks like brainzgit is bugging a bit by not including github usernames in the messages
2025-10-31 30412, 2025
julian45[m]
which reminds me [Jade](https://matrix.to/#/@jade:continuwuity.org): maybe time to take a crack at some of the libretto pending items / stretch goals like maubot and related bots?
2025-10-31 30425, 2025
lucifer[m]
<_BrainzGit> "[musicbrainz-server] owlpharoah..." <- [@julian45:julian45.net](https://matrix.to/#/@julian45:julian45.net) this has the GitHub username in it?
2025-10-31 30452, 2025
rinsuki[m] has quit
2025-10-31 30402, 2025
Kladky joined the channel
2025-10-31 30400, 2025
reosarevok[m]
zas: Can you check "Clarification Needed on API Rate Limiting Description" when you have some time?
2025-10-31 30425, 2025
reosarevok[m]
Maybe we should just not mention the average thing because it seems like it makes people want to game it, and just say 1/s and that's it...
2025-10-31 30438, 2025
zas[m] has quit
2025-10-31 30402, 2025
mayhem[m]
<reosarevok[m]> "zas: Can you check "Clarificatio..." <- I kinda think we ought to reply: "You're overthinking this. There is no permanent penalty for exceeding the rate limit -- play around with it until you get the idea of it. Partly because production systems don't really want to adhere to human thought out limits, thus we define things as 'on average'."
