2. On the reports page in the 'artist origins' block, what does changing the dropdown from 'artists' to 'listens' represent? I naively thought it would be where in the world I listened to the recording (although I'd be concerned if last.fm was recording that...), but that doesn't seem to be the case
2021-07-04 18554, 2021
navap
3. Hot linking entity names to their MB pages seems like a very obvious improvement, so I'm surprised that hasn't been done. Am I missing something there, or is that a ticket I should file?
2021-07-04 18549, 2021
navap
4. Viewing reports/charts for top of the *week* uses a date in 2020, is this a hard coded date for some reason? I can't figure out a way to change which week is represented
2021-07-04 18542, 2021
navap has quit
2021-07-04 18557, 2021
navap joined the channel
2021-07-04 18547, 2021
DragonsChild has quit
2021-07-04 18509, 2021
DragonsChild joined the channel
2021-07-04 18529, 2021
DragonsChild has quit
2021-07-04 18527, 2021
navap
For #3 - Ah, recordings are linked, but looks like the MBID values in my case are all track IDs. Clicking the link on LB results in a 404 on MB, but if I change the URL to track/ it sort of works. It finds _a_ track with the same name and artist, but not necessarily the right recording.
2021-07-04 18525, 2021
lucifer
navap: 2) listens/artists chooses the count to be displayed when you click on a country on the map. it is not your location rather the location from where the artists you listened to originate from.
2021-07-04 18515, 2021
lucifer
for 3, can you give an example link. i do not understand what you mean completely.
2021-07-04 18502, 2021
lucifer
in any case, one issue regarding linking to MB is that not all submitted listens have a MBID. we have an ongoing project to try and map all listens to an mbid. it has currently mapped listens as old as 2012 with a success rate of ~60%.
2021-07-04 18534, 2021
lucifer
regarding 4), i checked your reports (assuming your LB username is navap as well). the date is not hardcoded but that way because it was probably the last time stats were generated for you.
regarding 1), i think ruaok managed the trello board. we can probably update it or remove it from the roadmap.
2021-07-04 18538, 2021
navap
lucifer: #2, doh. That should have been obvious 🤦🏾♂️. I was more focused on the heatmap colours which roughly stay the same given the high corelation (for my stats anyway) between # of artists and # of listens
For #4, yes the week date does look like the date of my last import (prior to today). So I guess that's a by design item and not really a bug...
2021-07-04 18534, 2021
lucifer
navap, those should be recording mbid, but there might be a bug somewhere. i'll check and if i can find something.
2021-07-04 18507, 2021
navap
My wild guess is that I first scrobbled those songs on last.fm pre-NGS (i.e. the MP3s didn't have a "recording ID" at all), and so all scrobbles for the same "song" show up with that legacy track ID instead of the current recording ID that is embedded in the same MP3
2021-07-04 18558, 2021
lucifer
we actually don't use track mbids anywhere in LB yet.
2021-07-04 18551, 2021
navap
Right, but I'm assuming we're importing the "ID" that last.fm has on record for the scrobble, and in my case many of my MP3s would have been initially scrobbled with only a track ID ("recordings" didn't exist when I first started using last.fm)
2021-07-04 18524, 2021
navap
So the LB code is expecting a recording ID, but my account actually has track IDs tied to (some of) my listens
(again, these are just me making wild guesses and assumptions)
2021-07-04 18505, 2021
lucifer
we store it under a separate name so there's shouldn't be a mixup.
2021-07-04 18537, 2021
navap
I'm not familiar with the LB codebase. Where do we obtain the recording ID from?
2021-07-04 18521, 2021
lucifer
either the user submits the "recording_mbid" field or it comes from the msid-mbid mapping.
2021-07-04 18505, 2021
navap
What's an msid/
2021-07-04 18528, 2021
navap
Also FYI, in my case all of my listens are imported from last.fm
2021-07-04 18538, 2021
lucifer
msids are internal identifier used by LB for listens that do not have an associated mbid. roughly speaking, all recordings/artists/releases with the same name have same msid.
2021-07-04 18542, 2021
navap
Oh, is MSID == messybrainz ID?
2021-07-04 18548, 2021
lucifer
right
2021-07-04 18507, 2021
navap
Could you point me to the code that buils the daily activity report? Specifically I'd like to adjust the graph so that the 'average' row is visually distinct from the days of the week (e.g. bolded, bit of a margin between them, etc.)
yvanzo: Isn't the input field already auto-focus now?
2021-07-04 18542, 2021
akashgp09 joined the channel
2021-07-04 18543, 2021
Toasty joined the channel
2021-07-04 18534, 2021
akshaaatt[m]
Hi lucifer !
2021-07-04 18524, 2021
zas
yvanzo: sir bugged again
2021-07-04 18508, 2021
shivam-kapila
Get well soon monkey. Take care
2021-07-04 18506, 2021
lucifer
hi akshaaatt[m] !
2021-07-04 18552, 2021
shivam-kapila
akshaaatt[m]: I guess you will need an invite from Freso to be able to publish a blog
2021-07-04 18521, 2021
akshaaatt[m]
Right I was wondering the same shivam-kapila . Hi btw!
2021-07-04 18515, 2021
shivam-kapila
Hi :). Someone with Wordpress admin access will need to invite you.
2021-07-04 18541, 2021
akshaaatt[m]
Okay then I am in no hurry to publish a blog so will work accordingly 😇
2021-07-04 18520, 2021
Toasty_ joined the channel
2021-07-04 18536, 2021
Toasty_ has quit
2021-07-04 18548, 2021
akashgp09 has quit
2021-07-04 18512, 2021
lucifer
shivam-kapila: yup :D
2021-07-04 18527, 2021
lucifer
akshaaatt[m]: yes, you'll need an invite from an admin. ruaok or Freso probably.
2021-07-04 18500, 2021
Toasty has quit
2021-07-04 18554, 2021
akashgp09 joined the channel
2021-07-04 18548, 2021
shivam-kapila
lucifer: got ya bud. Enjoy the coffee ;)
2021-07-04 18532, 2021
yvanzo
zas: it seems to be resolved for now
2021-07-04 18556, 2021
yvanzo
yyoung: if so, there is no extra click problem?
2021-07-04 18501, 2021
[1997kB] joined the channel
2021-07-04 18513, 2021
[1997kB]
link in topic doesn't work. ^
2021-07-04 18518, 2021
[1997kB]
and weirdly now it works. :/
2021-07-04 18533, 2021
yyoung
yvanzo: There's still extra clicks to open the popover and save
2021-07-04 18550, 2021
yvanzo
yyoung: pressing enter doesn't save?
2021-07-04 18557, 2021
Toasty joined the channel
2021-07-04 18527, 2021
Toasty has quit
2021-07-04 18548, 2021
Toasty joined the channel
2021-07-04 18529, 2021
Toasty has quit
2021-07-04 18504, 2021
Toasty joined the channel
2021-07-04 18511, 2021
yyoung
yvanzo: No, pressing enter can also save
2021-07-04 18521, 2021
rdswift_ joined the channel
2021-07-04 18536, 2021
rdswift has quit
2021-07-04 18546, 2021
rdswift_ is now known as rdswift
2021-07-04 18509, 2021
yvanzo
yyoung: Ok, so it requires only one click to open the popover, not to save it.
2021-07-04 18507, 2021
yvanzo
Currently to edit an existing link, I usually click on its input field to get focus on it and make my changes.
2021-07-04 18505, 2021
yvanzo
So there seems to be no extra click, just one extra Enter key.
2021-07-04 18530, 2021
yvanzo
That makes one con for popover, let's see pros now: 1) clean URL display as a link allows to visually check it (whereas input field may hide part of it) 2) dialog can be extended with options: apply to unclean, bypass cleanup (whereas bubble doesn’t allow that easily).
2021-07-04 18551, 2021
yvanzo
(Plus I don’t know about technical reliability/editors’ acceptance of switching input field’s content on focus/blur.)
2021-07-04 18522, 2021
akashgp09 has quit
2021-07-04 18544, 2021
Zhele has quit
2021-07-04 18538, 2021
Zhele joined the channel
2021-07-04 18513, 2021
zas
yvanzo: sir broke again, cmp recursion exception this time
