Not sure if we do that at all yet, but we have talk of it at least
2021-09-27 27013, 2021
CatQuest
does it depend on wich place they are spamming?
2021-09-27 27022, 2021
CatQuest
eg listen sapmmers or music spammers or book spammers
2021-09-27 27027, 2021
reosarevok
CatQuest: all of it is MB based rn, so probably not
2021-09-27 27033, 2021
reosarevok
(as in, based on MB accounts)
2021-09-27 27037, 2021
CatQuest
some are listenbrainz
2021-09-27 27043, 2021
bitmap
a new account flags sounds sensible to me
2021-09-27 27003, 2021
reosarevok
I guess if someone is only spamming on one non-MB site but acting normally on MB then we should have a more calm talk, but that seems unlikely :)
2021-09-27 27033, 2021
Freso
Anyway. Seems like there is general agreement on it not being completely far-fetched.
2021-09-27 27047, 2021
ruaok nods
2021-09-27 27048, 2021
Freso
The ticket is open for implementation discussion/questions/comments. :)
2021-09-27 27005, 2021
Freso
Alright, last item!
2021-09-27 27007, 2021
Freso
cat: chocolate
2021-09-27 27009, 2021
yvanzo
Will do
2021-09-27 27011, 2021
CatQuest
:D
2021-09-27 27016, 2021
CatQuest
so I got an idea: what if we, before the summit, all send some chocolate to barcelona, and then ruaok and monkey all create fair piles to everyone and sent it back to us! (poss together with t-shirts/whatever surprise it was?)
2021-09-27 27017, 2021
CatQuest
good/bad idea? :D
2021-09-27 27026, 2021
ruaok
bad.
2021-09-27 27033, 2021
CatQuest
oh :(
2021-09-27 27037, 2021
reosarevok
I guess "too much effort", mostly :p
2021-09-27 27040, 2021
ruaok
a shipping nightmare
2021-09-27 27041, 2021
CatQuest
aw
2021-09-27 27044, 2021
monkey
We're not going to handle the t-shirt shipping logistics, and that was really helpful last year
2021-09-27 27046, 2021
Freso
I don’t think I’d be able to manage that. :\
2021-09-27 27047, 2021
ruaok
I will have no part of that.
2021-09-27 27005, 2021
CatQuest
ok ok, it was jsut an idea
2021-09-27 27011, 2021
CatQuest
finish then
2021-09-27 27013, 2021
reosarevok
If something, then having some sort of "each one gets assigned one other person to send chocolate to" would be more manageable
2021-09-27 27021, 2021
reosarevok
Although I dunno how easy it is to ship it :)
2021-09-27 27031, 2021
reosarevok
Might be it all just melts
2021-09-27 27042, 2021
CatQuest
honestly it's just becasue i want to taste that damn mapelsyrup canadian chocolate again :P
2021-09-27 27047, 2021
monkey
Not sure chocolate travels that well unrefrigerated, to be honest
2021-09-27 27051, 2021
CatQuest
not here. it will rain away :D
2021-09-27 27001, 2021
CatQuest
honestly it's usually fine
2021-09-27 27003, 2021
ruaok
too hot in many places still to ship chocolate
2021-09-27 27018, 2021
Freso
I think the idea is a no-go. Sorry CatQuest. :\
2021-09-27 27034, 2021
Freso
Which, I think, also (chocolate?) wraps up this meeting!
Freso: I think the spammer flag could be complementary with spam reports designed to work with SpamBrainz, I will check that.
2021-09-27 27051, 2021
yvanzo
Thanks everyone!
2021-09-27 27001, 2021
monkey
It's called a CDN, isn't it? Chocolate Delivery network? :p
2021-09-27 27023, 2021
CatQuest
:D
2021-09-27 27004, 2021
monkey
Thanks Freso :)
2021-09-27 27019, 2021
lucifer
tandy[m]: the sitewide api endpoints changed the format of json returned by them. the sitewide had not been calculated for over a year so we thought no one used it. sorry. i think you'll need to update the client code.
2021-09-27 27027, 2021
tandy[m]
lucifer: thats no problem, i maintain the nim bindings for the listenbrainz api and i dont actually interact with the json, just return it :)
tandy[m]: i am not sure what caused the error in your CI. the endpoints should still be working but the data they return might not be up to date or useful.
currently, its returning 204 as expected. once we trigger stats generation, it should return actual stats.
2021-09-27 27022, 2021
bitmap
reosarevok: well, I'd like to avoid merging something that makes those edits even more broken -- ideally we'd add back the old relationship types and fix the IDs in those older edits
2021-09-27 27008, 2021
tandy[m]
lucifer: oh yep, thatd be why the CI fails, tests raise an exception if the response isn't 200
2021-09-27 27009, 2021
bitmap
or for now we can have a list of type IDs that were re-used and avoid loading those if the edit is pre-ngs
2021-09-27 27048, 2021
lucifer
makes sense. fwiw, 204 is documented in LB docs if there are currently no stats. for example, a new user might not have stats as soon as they create an account. or say a user didn't listen anything in the last week.
2021-09-27 27057, 2021
lucifer
ruaok: one quick question, should i delete the test dump and reuqest a usual dump import? otherwise stats and other stuff won't run tommorrow.
on the other hand, it's kind of, well, all too realistic; a lot of projects end up getting used and stabilizing while still keeping the 0.x version numbers
2021-09-27 27006, 2021
riksucks
At first I thought it was a joke, but then it had a list of repos at their home page. So I thought maybe it's serious?
2021-09-27 27014, 2021
riksucks
I didn't know that actually
2021-09-27 27046, 2021
kepstin
they're basically calling out projects that have stuck with version numbers starting with 0 for a long time.
2021-09-27 27049, 2021
kepstin
The whole site is written in a sarcastic tone, and the original publish date is April 1. it's not something to take seriously.
2021-09-27 27057, 2021
riksucks
Lmao I see
2021-09-27 27013, 2021
kepstin
and also right on their About page: "ZeroVer is satire, please do not use it."
2021-09-27 27027, 2021
riksucks
Yeah i just checked rn lmao
2021-09-27 27057, 2021
riksucks
This was embarrassing lmao
2021-09-27 27012, 2021
BrainzGit
[bookbrainz-site] 14dependabot[bot] opened pull request #702 (03master…dependabot/npm_and_yarn/elastic/elasticsearch-7.15.0): chore(deps): bump @elastic/elasticsearch from 5.6.22 to 7.15.0 https://github.com/bookbrainz/bookbrainz-site/pul…
2021-09-27 27015, 2021
BrainzGit
[bookbrainz-site] 14dependabot[bot] closed pull request #695 (03master…dependabot/npm_and_yarn/elastic/elasticsearch-7.14.1): chore(deps): bump @elastic/elasticsearch from 5.6.22 to 7.14.1 https://github.com/bookbrainz/bookbrainz-site/pul…
2021-09-27 27002, 2021
BrainzGit
[bookbrainz-site] 14dependabot[bot] opened pull request #703 (03master…dependabot/npm_and_yarn/eslint-plugin-react-7.26.0): chore(deps-dev): bump eslint-plugin-react from 7.21.5 to 7.26.0 https://github.com/bookbrainz/bookbrainz-site/pul…
2021-09-27 27005, 2021
BrainzGit
[bookbrainz-site] 14dependabot[bot] closed pull request #700 (03master…dependabot/npm_and_yarn/eslint-plugin-react-7.25.3): chore(deps-dev): bump eslint-plugin-react from 7.21.5 to 7.25.3 https://github.com/bookbrainz/bookbrainz-site/pul…
2021-09-27 27008, 2021
reosarevok
bitmap: I guess the easiest way (but maybe overkill) is not load those for any pre-NGS edits?
2021-09-27 27008, 2021
nawcom has quit
2021-09-27 27020, 2021
nawcom_ joined the channel
2021-09-27 27022, 2021
ruaok
sure looks like it. :)
2021-09-27 27008, 2021
ruaok
lucifer: yes, delete dump and run the usual proces
