#metabrainz

Give it the knockout blow !

last week we released another Picard 2.7 beta

I also worked on few Picard PRs, and code reviews

then we proceeded to fail the upgrade of gaga

I also started to work on upcoming consul upgrade

apart that, usual maintenance, upgrades, user support, etc.

fin. ruaok ?

last week was the gaga upgrade, end of year report queries and getting top discoveries 2021 going again

look yours up here: https://bono.metabrainz.org/top-discoveries

if the recording_mbid column is NULL, it means that the data couldn't be matched. check to see if you need to add some albums to MB. :)

I also caught up on all the business BS that backed up due to the CAA mess.

speaking of CAA mess, have we heard anything from the radio stations in south america?

fin. monkey !

Hi !

Last week i continued work on making BrainzPlayer separate, with tandy's help.

I finished up a PR improving user feedback love/hate songs) in LB

I worked on showing cover art in LB: https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-serv...

There was also a need to redo the ListenCard CSS a bit to accommodate that: https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-serv...

It's currently deployed on test.LB if anyone wants a look: https://test.listenbrainz.org/user/mr_monkey/ch...

Also worked with akshaaatt on the Listenbrainz redesign, making some headway on a mockup

I reviewed some PRs and cleaned up old tickets

And that's that! lucifer go !

hi all!

soulcoughing. <3

(Only alastairp, yvanzo, and akshat left on my list – last call for anyone else who want to give review :))

i did some debugging around failing dumps and missing imports in spark. also, worked on various LB year in music stuff - user's most prominent color, new releases of top 50 artist. other than that some misc discussions and follow ups on existing PRs. that's it for me.

alastairp: next?

hi

last week I attended the ismir conference online, and saw some interesting projects using MB and AB data

I also saw a few interesting things that we could use in LB for recommendations, I shared some things in chat throughout the week

I reviewed a huge number of LB prs, !m lucifer for continuing to work on those

I did some work on dumping timescale tables as a part of the full dump

I was around during the 2 gaga upgrades

we merged and released the documentation update for LB listen format, and I forumed it here: https://community.metabrainz.org/t/updates-to-r...

I also updated settings in all of the brainz readthedocs for which I have access to disable google analytics and disable paid advertising

that's it. yvanzo?

Hi!

Nothing to report as I was moving last week. :)

I hope it went well. :)

same

CatQuest: where did you move to?

:D

Not fully installed yet, but back to work this week at least. :)

Go akshaaatt!

Hi Everyone!

Last week was tedious for me with many college deadlines and exams since the semester ends for me in a couple of weeks, followed by a month of break.

During the weekdays, I could only get to work on some enhancements I had due on some PRs.

I had a cold as well due to the changing weather but now I am sound.

I mainly worked during the weekend and designed the Login, Register, and Profile page for the MB revamp. The PR should be final in a day or two.

Looking forward to making some tweaks to LB this week since I have found some areas of improvement.

That's it for me. fin!

Oh, right.

pick someone else akshaaatt

No more left.

Go ruaok! :)

I was also waiting for next to be picked. 😂

lol

Thank you everyone who gave reviews!

Yes, ruaok, go. :p

ruaok: January docsprint

during the summit we talked about doing a doc sprint in january -- we weren't ready to commit to a date yet...

can we now? we proposed the week of Jan 17.

I've decided to document my job that week. all the non-technical things

I can put it in my calendar

OK for me ! It's already in the calendar

a ruaok disaster recovery plan, effectively.

!m ruaok

You're doing good work, ruaok!

any objections to that week being a doc centric week?

ok for me

Sounds good to me

👍

I'll even do it for adding instruments so my (word opposite of predecessor) will have osmething ot go on

right, motion carried then. Week of Jan 17 it is!

January Docathon is go !

I have a lot of stuff to think about in the meantime. so many moving parts. oy.

back to Freso

Aaaand…

lucifer: Follow up on Summit Notes -> Tickets

Over to lucifer :)

another week, another reminder. let's convert summit notes to tickets :D

fin.

Summit notes here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MdK9y1fSa5A...

thanks monkey!

Thank you lucifer and monkey :)

And that’s all for this meeting!

monkey: on https://test.listenbrainz.org/user/mr_monkey/ch... -- I feel that the lines that have no cover art break the flow of the data. would a placeholder/image be a good idea here?

Thank you all for your time! Stay safe out there!

thanks Freso

</BANG>

Thanks Freso! Saddened to see the personal attacks against you out there

Thanks!

ruaok: Mayhaps?

I'd love for you to give it a try...

do you need technical knowhow to write those tickets?

if not, i cna work on it

If we improve resolution of cover art (with an LB endpoint we can query), it might be less of an issue, and missing data would more clearly stand out

ruaok: Here's an approximation; I get returned some placeholder image from youtube towards the bottom of the list: https://test.listenbrainz.org/user/mr_monkey/?m...

CatQuest: Help appreciated :) I'm guessing probably not for the most part, and you can always tag people to look at and add more details to the tickets

Or ignore the ones you're not sure about

monkey: looks good to me. I'd love to see something like that.

Maybe a sort of "add me to MusicBrainz" thumbnail ?

or CAA thumbnail?

one of the two, yes

monkey: then i'll do that this week

ruaok: if I add stuff to MB, how quickly if at all does https://bono.metabrainz.org/top-discoveries?use... remap?

monky zas/ othes. got a question on the dummit notes

Is the dummit notes the version of the summit notes with very simple English?

ruaok: alternating fornights, I think.

fortnights, even.

more seriously, that I was I am working on. to have the mapping redo unmatched items and then I need to rerun the bono data. I'll do that before we push the reports final data.

[musicbrainz-server] 14reosarevok opened pull request #2334 (03master…MBS-12077): MBS-12077: Also block useless edit notes on the release editor https://github.com/metabrainz/musicbrainz-serve...

[bookbrainz-site] 14dependabot[bot] opened pull request #716 (03master…dependabot/npm_and_yarn/webpack-5.64.1): chore(deps-dev): bump webpack from 5.12.3 to 5.64.1 https://github.com/bookbrainz/bookbrainz-site/p...

[bookbrainz-site] 14dependabot[bot] closed pull request #713 (03master…dependabot/npm_and_yarn/webpack-5.61.0): chore(deps-dev): bump webpack from 5.12.3 to 5.61.0 https://github.com/bookbrainz/bookbrainz-site/p...

thanks reosarevok and bitmap for humouring me and my MB review :)

I mean, it includes good points, so :)

Feel free to do more of those :D

ah - is that the trick? make good points and people listen to you? :)

ruaok: alastairp: which schema should year_in_music table go into?

stats, no?

some things are stats but not all.

stats seems fine to me

ok, i don't have a better suggestion anyways. going with stats.

[listenbrainz-server] 14amCap1712 opened pull request #1732 (03master…year-in-music): 2021 Year in music https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-serv...

ruaok: alastairp: can you take a look at this file? https://github.com/metabrainz/listenbrainz-serv... i'll then create the table in prod.

spark side looks ready, once the data is in db. i'll start the api endpoint work.

how will you add more stats to this table?

add more columns?

yes

seems a bit cumbersome.

as more stuff becomes ready, add more update scripts to add more columns.

oh

needing a schema change for each feature added to the year end report

yeah right. i think its the most flexible currently though.

I think a single JSONB column could be sufficient. we just add more top level keys. and we'll need to provide a method to add more keys to the json blob though.

a single JSONB column is more flexible, but has less structure. and I think it would not be acceptable in most cases, but this is not data we intend to query, except all at once. so I thin its permissable here.

yeah that's possible

we had something like that in old stats format. i'll modify this on those lines then.

cool