hm. i'm unsure aobut the japanese wide-latin being converted is a goo idea
2021-11-18 32222, 2021
CatJourney
well I mean both v a p o r w a v e and ｖａｐｏｒｗａｖｅ shoudl be ab alais of "vaporwave" but
2021-11-18 32227, 2021
CatJourney
alias even
2021-11-18 32253, 2021
CatJourney
.__________.
2021-11-18 32253, 2021
CatJourney
"christian vaporwave"
2021-11-18 32253, 2021
CatJourney
what is even
2021-11-18 32208, 2021
riksucks
Lmao
2021-11-18 32225, 2021
riksucks
But I am impressed with vaporwave entries in musicbrainz
2021-11-18 32232, 2021
riksucks
Someone has taste, lol
2021-11-18 32206, 2021
CatJourney
looking at this seearch. man it *would* be cool if: whenever you tyoed in a tag, every, and any tag that *exists* that match it woulld be suggested?
2021-11-18 32249, 2021
CatJourney
people would thne see "jazz vaporwave" matches with "jazzy vaporwave" and could make a judgment about if they wanted that or this
2021-11-18 32227, 2021
CatJourney
exeptions: tags with *very many* downvotes
2021-11-18 32228, 2021
riksucks
That's a good idea
2021-11-18 32242, 2021
CatJourney
or tags of a.. neative value (liek slurs or hatespeach)
2021-11-18 32250, 2021
CatJourney
or straight up "this x sucks" etc
2021-11-18 32232, 2021
CatJourney
maybe we need to separate the idea into "these are geners but not actually genres in mb" and "this is jsut a "lol i liek this music" type folksonomy tag
2021-11-18 32242, 2021
CatJourney
or reo needs to add "industrial vaporwave"
2021-11-18 32245, 2021
alastairp
CatJourney: as tag recommendations, or in the tag search page?
2021-11-18 32202, 2021
CatJourney
alastairp: i mena they already show in the search page :D
2021-11-18 32223, 2021
alastairp
yeah, I think there is a lot of potential for improving the autocomplete in the tag box
2021-11-18 32242, 2021
CatJourney
as long as "my own" aren't removed or overwritten in any way :D
2021-11-18 32212, 2021
CatJourney still feels bad for what reo went trough with that last time
2021-11-18 32227, 2021
bitmap
reosarevok: the comment for find_by_collection is quite old (for postgres 9.1) so I'm not sure how relevant it is anymore. I'd just make the change you want and check the performance of it on pink (try EXPLAIN ANALYZE)
2021-11-18 32252, 2021
bitmap
yvanzo: sure, I don't mind being more transparent about the release process
ORG-50: Making MB emails less spammy and hostile sounding
2021-11-18 32250, 2021
yvanzo joined the channel
2021-11-18 32232, 2021
CatJourney
ruaok: are you there? I'll had a ticket for cleaning up syswiki, should that be on org or other or something lse?
2021-11-18 32234, 2021
Freso joined the channel
2021-11-18 32217, 2021
ruaok
MBH, i would say
2021-11-18 32223, 2021
CatJourney
cool
2021-11-18 32249, 2021
CatJourney
actually it'd be good if all the things on https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MdK9y1fSa5AEz… (that does not have a linked ticket) had the project that ticket shoudl be in written, annotation, whatever
2021-11-18 32205, 2021
CatJourney
written or annotated
2021-11-18 32222, 2021
reosarevok joined the channel
2021-11-18 32236, 2021
reosarevok
yvanzo: it's the same code that was in the one PR earlier
2021-11-18 32241, 2021
reosarevok
So I'm not sure it makes much of a difference
2021-11-18 32246, 2021
reosarevok
But if it does, sure, push it out :)
2021-11-18 32248, 2021
CatJourney
also if the type is anything but "task"
2021-11-18 32255, 2021
CatJourney
reo what?
2021-11-18 32209, 2021
CatJourney
oh
2021-11-18 32229, 2021
reosarevok
CatJourney: I was disconnected so if you were asking me stuff, I didn't see it :)
2021-11-18 32238, 2021
CatJourney
oh no.
2021-11-18 32246, 2021
CatJourney
(I wrote in pm)
2021-11-18 32256, 2021
CatJourney
i'll repaste after i finish his ticket
2021-11-18 32256, 2021
yvanzo
reosarevok: Given you did not take combinations in account at first, I guess tests may need to be reworked too. Is that assumption correct?
2021-11-18 32209, 2021
reosarevok
It might need to, yes
2021-11-18 32215, 2021
reosarevok
So yeah, push it out :)
2021-11-18 32227, 2021
yvanzo
Ok, will do!
2021-11-18 32245, 2021
reosarevok
I'd rather think we should actually refactor restrict to have a way to say "any of these in any combination", but
2021-11-18 32220, 2021
reosarevok
In any case it requires a bit more work :)
2021-11-18 32217, 2021
reg[m] has quit
2021-11-18 32221, 2021
yvanzo
Yes, the current implementation is verbose. Hopefully there should not be a lot of these combinations, so it doesn’t seem needed to be able to scale up with combinations of 4 different types.
2021-11-18 32231, 2021
legoktm[m] has quit
2021-11-18 32237, 2021
reg[m] joined the channel
2021-11-18 32211, 2021
kepstin has quit
2021-11-18 32239, 2021
kepstin joined the channel
2021-11-18 32239, 2021
legoktm[m] joined the channel
2021-11-18 32200, 2021
ruaok
seems like a bad day for the internet in BCN. office out. home out. pharmacy out.
2021-11-18 32220, 2021
tandy1000 joined the channel
2021-11-18 32222, 2021
CatJourney
reosarevok, ruaok or yvanzo: can either of you look at the summit notes document and write which project the not-yet-ticketed posts should belong to? (if you can access it that is :D)
