but I'm a bit confused as to what actually failed for me, because we run init_db in the tests. but I saw an error running init_db locally on my machine
Hi Indian peeps, we have moved our meeting from Saturday to tomorrow at CP in Delhi
2022-10-25 29800, 2022
akshaaatt
ansh: riksucks , it that interests you
2022-10-25 29822, 2022
monkey
lucifer: I added a commit to your multi-stage-build-branch, supporting relative paths in webpack config so I can use it outside of docker. Small change so I don't expect any difference from what the PR changes.
2022-10-25 29822, 2022
monkey
Everything seems to be working great on my side for the whole PR. Wanna give it a spin?
2022-10-25 29842, 2022
alastairp
monkey: that's great!
2022-10-25 29859, 2022
kgz joined the channel
2022-10-25 29841, 2022
lucifer
monkey: changes lgtm.
2022-10-25 29830, 2022
monkey
Added a comment about paths as well, I think my brain isn't working well enough for this :p
2022-10-25 29852, 2022
lucifer
i wondered the same and had tried copying at same path but then realized it would copy over node modules as well. easiest way was to keep copying to a separate place.
mayhem, alastairp, reosarevok: i ran the script for daily jams manually for users who hadn't got the daily jam today to test the fixes. i checked manually and see dails jams in your and jukevox's accounts
hehe, still need to do more timing testing. it ran fast enough on wolf and i manually checked the sql queries and this produces less queries.
2022-10-25 29850, 2022
aerozol
Glad people are digging into the signup UX. I've hit my hours for this week, but itching to get those LB mockups started
2022-10-25 29859, 2022
lucifer
however, best to test on an isolated vm so that the numbers are comparable.
2022-10-25 29832, 2022
aerozol
akshaaatt: I can't see the 3d cover :(
2022-10-25 29807, 2022
akshaaatt
Yeah aerozol, I broke my code while converting the library to typescript
2022-10-25 29821, 2022
akshaaatt
I was hoping no one would noticeā¦š
2022-10-25 29838, 2022
aerozol
Haha that's all good I was just having a sneaky peek at your message to monkey anyway
2022-10-25 29840, 2022
aerozol
Re. signup woes I think when we have centralized oauth we will have to have a way of redirecting users back to where they can't from anyway. Bit cheeky to just assume everyone wants to go back to mb?
2022-10-25 29855, 2022
aerozol
I liked @elomatreb[m]s suggestion of having them input the email but not needing to confirm it to start using LB. I don't know if we would ever need them to confirm it? Maybe if we start having issues? I wonder what other modern sites do
2022-10-25 29849, 2022
rdswift
alastairp, reosarevok, et al: I know I'm a bit late to the user account structure discussion (I'm blaming that on my timezone), but I've put together a brief discussion of the way I've set it up for the sports pools sites that I manage.
2022-10-25 29850, 2022
rdswift
Each of the pools was originally on a separate site, with a separate database. Last year, I combined the databases and sites so that someone participating in more than one pool only had to have a single account for logging in and managing their information for all of the pools.
2022-10-25 29851, 2022
rdswift
I'm not for a moment suggesting that you need to use this structure, but perhaps it might prompt some ideas when the time comes to combine the various *Brainz accounts.
once we confirm the regression is fixed and we should probably move to py3 first and then look further into improving rest of stuff. newer sqlalchemy versions have `raisedload` feature which will give an exception with stack trace when we access a lazily loaded property. which is probably what we want.
2022-10-25 29828, 2022
monkey
The interactive part is what sells it. It'll be fun to have on LB.
2022-10-25 29828, 2022
monkey
A friend suggested making it into a sort of banner at the top of a user's profile (sort of like they have in facebook etc.), but unfortunately the charting library doesn't take advantage of the extra horizontal space, so not great for that. Perhaps we'll find a good home for it
2022-10-25 29846, 2022
alastairp
lucifer: yes, right. Lots of small steps to make, as with all projects
2022-10-25 29802, 2022
monkey glares at the small steps
2022-10-25 29804, 2022
lucifer
indeed
2022-10-25 29814, 2022
alastairp
but I agree, get it to same level as it currently is, and py3 would be great
2022-10-25 29820, 2022
monkey
"but I want my cake NOW!"
2022-10-25 29833, 2022
alastairp
I agree that individual custom queries per entity may be better
2022-10-25 29815, 2022
lucifer
there's also the rmq library issues, moving to kombu will probably stablise sir.
2022-10-25 29849, 2022
alastairp
neat. I've tried to stay away from that side of things
