julian45: hey! today is the day I check in with you about the test VM we made a few weeks back. still need it?
julian45[m] joined the channel
julian45[m]
<mayhem[m]> "julian45: hey! today is the..." <- hey! i think i need it for 1 more week, and then we can probably get rid of it. would that work for you?
suvid[m] has quit
lucifer[m] joined the channel
lucifer[m]
rayyan_seliya123, suvid, m.amanullah7 will answer your questions later today.
mayhem: gentle reminder about similarity data.
mayhem[m]
on it. (very soon anyways)
rostiku[m] joined the channel
rostiku[m]
Hey guys, I'm working on joining release_first_release_date on release to determine the earliest released track. This is what SQL script I have so far:... (full message at <https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/...>)
s/released track/release/
Do the release ids have any significance? I am thinking to just stick to the one with the lowest release id. But to me that makes the whole join process irrelevant.
reosarevok[m]
If the date is the same, by definition any of them are equally earliest :)
Jade[m] joined the channel
Jade[m]
Heya, I won't be at the meeting today, being on holiday :)
reosarevok[m]
Release ids will just depend on what was added first, which has nothing to do with the actual date
If you don't really care about earliest as such but want a canonical release for each group, the LB people have code for that
mayhem: ^
But that's a different thing of course :)
Jade: enjoy!
Jade[m]
reosarevok[m]: Thank you ❤️
rostiku[m]
Yeah, I guess you're right, it's the "earliest" release and there can be multiple "earliest" releases. I am just trying to decide how to find the "best" earliest release.
I'm thinking if I combine the two processes, get the "earliest" releases, then see what was added first (by release ID), it'll be satisfactory. But I'll be happy to look into the "canonical release" determination code as well
reosarevok[m]
bitmap: do you know if there's any real reason we don't show ACs in duplicates? (MBS-14065)
bitmap, zas, outsidecontext: not sure what changes we need to do for MBS-14062 - maybe you know more about it? (I'm not sure why it shouldn't work when allowing it, but that's what the ticket claims)
reosarevok: not sure, I also think it should work once permission was granted. I can test
I looked into this recently for my magic tagger button user script. There it still works without prompt due to user scripts having different permissions
But it generally looked like the normal button on the page should work once granted
zas[m] joined the channel
zas[m]
This is more or less the same issue than with Safari right? Do we really need the Tagger button ? I know it's convenient but it is more and more a problem it seems
outsidecontext[m
I think safari is different
reosarevok: the difference between https://musicbrainz.org/taglookup and the other pages is that everywhere else the tagger buttons have a click event and the call to the local networks is controlled by scripting. That makes Chrome show the prompt to grant access. On taglookup it is just a link and Chrome disallows the navigation.
outsidecontext[m uploaded an image: (61KiB) < https://matrix.chatbrainz.org/_matrix/media/v3/download/matrix.org/wFBbfmGgYhLHTmObqHILdhdq/image.png >
Actually reloading that page then works (but this is not pretty anyway)
So the fix would be to enable the script handling of the tagger buttons on the taglookup page as well
reosarevok[m]
Ok, I wonder if it's a React vs TT thing
I'll check
mayhem[m]
lucifer: labs.api is running quite slowly -- the similarity data takes eons to return, making eval hard. are there some missing indexes, perhaps?
rostiku[m]
hey, is there a way to populate the cover_art_archive schema after setting up the musicbrainz-server? I am currently retrieving cover art using the CAA API and caching it. Wondering if I could just populate the schema and not need to query the API anymore
reosarevok[m]
outsidecontext: I don't have Picard installed here - what's the link you get when tag-lookuping from Picard?
Does it have the ?tport=8000 bit or? (any example works)
outsidecontext[m
reosarevok: I think it is not possible to directly open the taglookup page from within Picard. But yes, there are multiple cases where Picard can open a MB website, and it will always append the `tport` parameter
