#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • ruaok
        funny.
      • 2010-01-14 01451, 2010

      • ruaok
        aCiD2: yes, I haven't changed that.
      • 2010-01-14 01453, 2010

      • aCiD2
        ah ok
      • 2010-01-14 01459, 2010

      • ruaok
        feel free to if you care.
      • 2010-01-14 01403, 2010

      • ruaok
        but it needs to be done.
      • 2010-01-14 01410, 2010

      • ijabz_
        ruaok:, i've just finished checking in code for NGS Beta, not expecting to do anymore now before Monday
      • 2010-01-14 01420, 2010

      • ruaok
        ok.
      • 2010-01-14 01434, 2010

      • ruaok
        indexes need to be re-run, no?
      • 2010-01-14 01447, 2010

      • ijabz_
        yes they need rerunning
      • 2010-01-14 01413, 2010

      • ruaok
        ok.
      • 2010-01-14 01442, 2010

      • ruaok
        I'll rerun when when I leave the office.
      • 2010-01-14 01450, 2010

      • ruaok
        as to not DOS myself. :)
      • 2010-01-14 01425, 2010

      • ruaok runs a test index.
      • 2010-01-14 01410, 2010

      • navap wonders if this bug is still outstanding. http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/ticket/4076
      • 2010-01-14 01414, 2010

      • ruaok
        UTSL!
      • 2010-01-14 01438, 2010

      • nikki
        utsl?
      • 2010-01-14 01451, 2010

      • ruaok
        use the source, luke!
      • 2010-01-14 01456, 2010

      • nikki
        ah
      • 2010-01-14 01424, 2010

      • ruaok
        Skywalkers in Korea Cross Han Solo
      • 2010-01-14 01431, 2010

      • ruaok
      • 2010-01-14 01440, 2010

      • pronik
        search is still crazy ;)
      • 2010-01-14 01454, 2010

      • ruaok
        pronik: what do you mean?
      • 2010-01-14 01406, 2010

      • pronik
        the old queen test
      • 2010-01-14 01419, 2010

      • pronik
        full match should be 100% in my world
      • 2010-01-14 01424, 2010

      • ruaok
        thats not going to be fixed anytime soo.
      • 2010-01-14 01433, 2010

      • ruaok
        pronik: in just about everyone else's too.
      • 2010-01-14 01442, 2010

      • ijabz_
        pronik, remind me
      • 2010-01-14 01442, 2010

      • ruaok
        but this is a lucene problem not our problem.
      • 2010-01-14 01443, 2010

      • pronik
        oh, yeah, right, you told me last time, I forgot :(
      • 2010-01-14 01453, 2010

      • ruaok
        np
      • 2010-01-14 01454, 2010

      • pronik
        ijabz_: about the problem?
      • 2010-01-14 01401, 2010

      • ijabz_
        yep
      • 2010-01-14 01417, 2010

      • pronik
        ijabz_: searching for "Queen" yields Queen on top with the score of 10 in direct search
      • 2010-01-14 01422, 2010

      • pronik
        instead of 100 in my world
      • 2010-01-14 01434, 2010

      • pronik
        with indirect search it's only 79
      • 2010-01-14 01434, 2010

      • ruaok
        direct search is going 100 soon.
      • 2010-01-14 01447, 2010

      • ruaok
        there are two different search engines at work here.
      • 2010-01-14 01448, 2010

      • pronik
        with "Charmmy Queen" on the top with 100
      • 2010-01-14 01457, 2010

      • pronik
        ruaok: I'm giving the full picture ;)
      • 2010-01-14 01403, 2010

      • ruaok
        it would've been nice to make the direct search go to 11.
      • 2010-01-14 01409, 2010

      • ruaok
        ah
      • 2010-01-14 01415, 2010

      • pronik
        would make a nice tweet...
      • 2010-01-14 01419, 2010

      • nikki
      • 2010-01-14 01428, 2010

      • ruaok
        MB's search goes to 11!
      • 2010-01-14 01454, 2010

      • ruaok
        nikki: no
      • 2010-01-14 01408, 2010

      • ijabz_
        what do you get if you search name:queen using advanced search
      • 2010-01-14 01420, 2010

      • ruaok
        one needs to be totally cache safe. the other is informational on a level above HTTP.
      • 2010-01-14 01440, 2010

      • navap
        ruaok: I think this is the file the bug is referencing. It hasn't been fixed though. http://bugs.musicbrainz.org/browser/python-musicb…
      • 2010-01-14 01445, 2010

      • pronik
        ijabz_: "No results found"
      • 2010-01-14 01454, 2010

      • pronik
      • 2010-01-14 01403, 2010

      • nikki
        hm, ok
      • 2010-01-14 01413, 2010

      • ijabz_
        pronik, sorry artist:queen
      • 2010-01-14 01407, 2010

      • pronik
        100, like it should be
      • 2010-01-14 01418, 2010

      • ijabz_
      • 2010-01-14 01430, 2010

      • pronik
        that's the one
      • 2010-01-14 01439, 2010

      • pronik
        like I said, 100
      • 2010-01-14 01442, 2010

      • pronik
        this one works properly
      • 2010-01-14 01424, 2010

      • ijabz_
        We could make the default query work better by field boosting artist over alias
      • 2010-01-14 01407, 2010

      • ijabz_
        But I have already fixed issue with alias scoring, not sure if that has made it to test yet
      • 2010-01-14 01414, 2010

      • ruaok
        I never had much luck with that approach. but maybe more recent versions of lucene do that better.
      • 2010-01-14 01422, 2010

      • ruaok
        ijabz_: no.
      • 2010-01-14 01427, 2010

      • ruaok
        test uses my box.
      • 2010-01-14 01435, 2010

      • ruaok
        my box won't be updated for another 7-8 hours.
      • 2010-01-14 01409, 2010

      • ijabz_
        Pronik ruoak - some technical explanation in this fixed bug http://jira.musicbrainz.org/browse/SEARCH-9
      • 2010-01-14 01439, 2010

      • ruaok
        was nikki the original author of the desc?
      • 2010-01-14 01447, 2010

      • nikki
        yes
      • 2010-01-14 01451, 2010

      • ruaok looks forward to playing with these changes in a few hours
      • 2010-01-14 01403, 2010

      • nikki
        hmm... what should happen to the components in trac once all the tickets for that component are in jira?
      • 2010-01-14 01420, 2010

      • ruaok
        remove them
      • 2010-01-14 01447, 2010

      • nikki
        won't that remove the component from all the old tickets?
      • 2010-01-14 01409, 2010

      • ruaok
        it shouldn't.
      • 2010-01-14 01434, 2010

      • ruaok
        but how about this. renaname the field and append "DO NOT USE" or some such text to make it clear
      • 2010-01-14 01444, 2010

      • ruaok
        and we somehow need to note that we're using jira now.
      • 2010-01-14 01412, 2010

      • nikki
        we could add (use jira) to the end
      • 2010-01-14 01421, 2010

      • aCiD2
        or (historical)
      • 2010-01-14 01427, 2010

      • ruaok nods
      • 2010-01-14 01447, 2010

      • ruaok
        djce: I'll stick with SSH access to DW for now. I'll play with the openvpn stuff after b1
      • 2010-01-14 01402, 2010

      • ruaok
        it helps having all the keys to the kingdom. :)
      • 2010-01-14 01412, 2010

      • djce
        well, of course :)
      • 2010-01-14 01455, 2010

      • ruaok
        ok, I'm going heads down for a bit. pmesg me if you need me.
      • 2010-01-14 01402, 2010

      • ruaok has left the channel