#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • ruaok
        aCiD2: artist i18n
      • aCiD2
        Right, so I didn't get time to sit down and code - but I'm know you're eager to update replication
      • we have 2 options - wait until I can do it all, or just get the schema change in now and start replication
      • it's up to you how soon you need this though I think
      • ruaok
        I'm for getting the schema change in so we can continue to test replication.
      • warp
        I have enough other things on my plate that I'm not graving for that replication just yet.
      • ruaok
        we originally said that the functionality doesn't need to be exposed yet.
      • warp
        s/graving/craving/
      • ruaok
        I just wait to avoid doing a schema cahnge for a while.
      • aCiD2 nods
      • aCiD2
        well I think it would be done this week
      • but a schema change I might even be able to get done tonight
      • ruaok
        aCiD2: ok, then bust out the schema change stuff when you can and we'll see about getting replication going next week.
      • aCiD2: even better. :)
      • aCiD2
        so you want that schema change asap then?
      • ruaok
        don't bust ass for that.
      • aCiD2
        ok
      • ruaok
        its not that important. but in the next few days would be awesome. :)
      • warp: last item for today: script detection
      • warp
        yay
      • aCiD2
        alright, if I haven't done the whole patch by thursday, i'll just up the schema change
      • ruaok
        ruaok has changed the topic to: agenda: script detecting
      • aCiD2: thx
      • warp
        when trying to detect the script, most common scripts can be matched easily. with Han characters we will need to offer a choice between a few options.
      • ruaok
        what is the context for script detection?
      • warp
        ruaok: MBS-416, people want a better way to select scripts compared to the current musicbrainz server.
      • ruaok
        got it.
      • ok, what is the question at hand then?
      • warp
        ruaok: but, when using that matching... there are about 40 scripts left which can currently be selected as a script on the server, but which will never be matched automatically
      • I think some of them may not even have any character in unicode (at this time)
      • (we currently offer the full set of ISO_15924 codes)
      • I'm wondering what to do with those
      • pronik_tp
        but we have releases in those scripts?
      • nikki
        warp: is this on the main server or on test?
      • warp
        pronik_tp: I haven't looked, that's something I probably should have done before the meeting :)
      • ruaok
        can we make it so that your guess script offers the guessed choices and "None of these, show full list" ?
      • nikki
        warp: test isn't hiding the scripts which aren't even in unicode (iirc)
      • warp
        nikki: I haven't look at what http://test.musicbrainz.org currently has.
      • brianfreud_
        nikki: when you say "not even in Unicode", are you including ConScript scripts in that?
      • warp
        ruaok: we can make it anything you want :)
      • brianfreud_ is thinking of Klingon
      • ruaok
        even it what I want doesn't make sense? :)
      • nikki
        brianfreud_: klingon isn't in unicode
      • ruaok
        lol
      • smack down!
      • brianfreud_
        exactly, but it is in ConScript
      • and in our current mason scripts list :P
      • nikki
        some people agreed on some private use characters so they could share some fonts, but there's nothing which says those private use characters are klingon and only klingon
      • ruaok
        warp: what exactly is the issue we're trying to decide then?
      • warp
        ruaok: well, if they can't even be represented in unicode. I was thinking, perhaps we could just leave them out. and only put them back in when people start complaining.
      • ruaok: for most, it's unlikely that we currently have releases in them... and that there will ever be releases in them.
      • (this is ofcourse the IX answer... prune the stuff ppl aren't using)
      • brianfreud_
        warp: http://www.evertype.com/standards/csur/ is what I'm talking about, and iirc, we do have at least one release in the db which uses Klingon
      • ruaok
        if it can't be represented in Unicode, is it fair to say that it cant be in MB?
      • luks
        ruaok: except it is in MB :)
      • warp
        ruaok: no, we have some releases in the DB with tracklistings which cannot be represented.
      • ruaok
        luks: HTH does that work?
      • brianfreud_
        Unicode Private Use Area (E000-F8FF and 000F0000-0010FFFF)
      • ruaok
        is it "romanized"?
      • brianfreud_
        ie, ConScript ;)
      • warp
        brianfreud_: the current list of scripts I cannot detect is http://git.musicbrainz.org/gitweb/?p=musicbrain...
      • nikki
        it's still a private use area, I don't see how it's any different from having a font which uses klingon glyphs for a-z and saying a latin release is in klingon script
      • ruaok
        feh.
      • brianfreud_
        because any release in Klingon, using a-z, is transliterated; a-z excludes Klingon CH, GH, NG, QH, TLH, and punctuation
      • warp
        ruaok: anyway, so, from an interaction design perspective, I would prefer to just not include any scripts which will likely go unused. but if that's not an option we can just make them fairly well-hidden :)
      • nikki
        brianfreud_: you can still pick characters to assign the glyph to
      • luks
        why not do the same as on the live server?
      • a 'Show all' button
      • ruaok
        warp: make it so that people *can* get to them, but hide them well to not confuse noobs.
      • luks
        or even a tiny link
      • warp
        ruaok: good enough for me. next topic :)
      • navap
        How about "Show all", and when you click it, a "Show Klingon" second link pops up :)
      • ruaok
        next topic? LUNCH!
      • </BANG>
      • MBChatLogger
        MBChatLogger has changed the topic to: http://musicbrainz.org/#devel
      • ruaok
        thanks for your time everyone!
      • warp
        thank you!
      • ruaok
        honot and nonoes, warp!
      • luciddrmr
        you guys going to be apply for SoC next week?
      • ruaok
        hellz yes.
      • warp
        what, nonoes too? awww maaaan
      • luciddrmr
        cool
      • ruaok
        when are the ideas pages due?
      • when we apply, right?
      • luciddrmr
        yeah. the deadline to apply is the 12th
      • registration opens on the 8th
      • ruaok
        easy. :)
      • luciddrmr
        cool
      • ruaok budgets some of nikkis choco to bribe the gsoc team
      • what are you bribing them to do? accept you as a mentoring org again this year?
      • stereohead joined the channel
      • ruaok kids
      • ruaok
        I always have choco for the team at the summit
      • luciddrmr
        i see :-)
      • brianfreud_
        I'm heading out in a sec, but before I go, quick Q - anyone able to point me to, or pastebin for me, the current static list of all ARs that are live on the mason server?
      • stereohead joined the channel
      • warp
        haha
      • ruaok
        brianfreud_: send me a mail about that. I can do that later this afternoon
      • nikki
      • pronik_tp
        ruaok: if you have a bit of your time, look at the MBH-6
      • warp
        ruaok: you needed to talk to me and aCiD2 a bit?
      • navap
        nikki: Yeah I think that's open for anyone to view.
      • brianfreud_
        thanks; doing an audit of everything AR-related in the wiki, and I want to check for any ARs I've missed which never actually get a Relationship Type page
      • nikki can see it, obviously, so wasn't sure
      • ruaok
        pronik_tp: that ticket is more djce, not I.
      • nikki
        brianfreud_: your ibdb/iobdb ones are still waiting for pages :P
      • ruaok
        I wasn't invoved in the setup of the git stuffs.
      • brianfreud_
        nope, IBDb exists, just IOBDb needs one :)
      • ruaok
        warp, aCiD2: I can make this short.
      • we need to make sure all the tickets are estimated tomorrow.
      • I would very much like to make the schedule and announce some dates.
      • aCiD2
        all, 100% all?
      • warp
        ok, some new ones have popped which I haven't estimated.
      • ruaok
        all NGS.
      • aCiD2
        ok
      • ruaok
        and there may be a couple more that I have on my list too.
      • and, I have received no timesheets from either of you.
      • brianfreud_
        Cover Art Relationship Type is needed too
      • ruaok
        thats all.
      • warp
        ruaok: how detailed do you want that
      • ?
      • ruaok
        try me something that you think is reasonable.
      • I'll give it a look see and tell if you if I want more/less info for next month.
      • that reasonable?
      • warp
        the data I have is per (ticket + description), or just the description for everything which isn't a jira ticket.
      • if you want I can give you just that, or aggregrate on jira tickets.
      • ruaok
        the former should be fine.
      • warp
        I'll get that to you tomorrow.
      • aCiD2 will too, latest
      • ruaok
        ok
      • warp
        aCiD2: do you have time to continue helping me with git?
      • aCiD2
        sure
      • warp
        hm, now I get
      • 6 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
      • aCiD2
        isn't that what you want?
      • warp
        oh, had three dots instead of two.
      • 7 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
      • aCiD2
        I still think it's easier to just do the merge, check the results in a visualizer, and if it's wrong then just "git reset --hard HEAD^" and revert the commit :)
      • warp
        aCiD2: that's the different with master
      • aCiD2
        merge commit that is
      • warp
        aCiD2: if I try to merge into next, a whole bunch of other files change
      • aCiD2
        have you looked at the visualization of the merge yet? gitg, gitk and giggle will all give you a clear idea of exactly what got merged where and why certain things happened
      • warp
        I started gitk now.
      • aCiD2
        I have no experience with no-commit either, I'd just go balls out and commit it. if you break it, git makes it trivial to rollback
      • warp
        17 files changed, 126 insertions(+), 319 deletions(-)
      • that's what git merge did.
      • warp starts gitk on it.
      • aCiD2
        doing "git checkout next; git merge --no-ff --log my-branch" right?
      • warp
        yes
      • aCiD2
        the --log will at least let you inspect the commit and see what commits it merged in too