I thought it best to just mention where the functionality of those files now lie, just in case people thought it odd I was going around deleting files ;)
2010-03-10 06944, 2010
ruaok joined the channel
2010-03-10 06923, 2010
ruaok
aCiD2: ping
2010-03-10 06909, 2010
ruaok joined the channel
2010-03-10 06942, 2010
ruaok prods aCiD2 again
2010-03-10 06903, 2010
warp is in 80x25
2010-03-10 06902, 2010
ruaok
on the new box?
2010-03-10 06906, 2010
warp
yes
2010-03-10 06911, 2010
alastairp
nice
2010-03-10 06921, 2010
ruaok
do tell, warp! whatchagot?
2010-03-10 06942, 2010
warp
debian stable didn't like it much. but the current debian testing snapshot netinstall .iso worked.
2010-03-10 06955, 2010
alastairp
grep ^processor /proc/cpuinfo|wc -l
2010-03-10 06918, 2010
warp
alastairp: I don't even have gnu screen yet to copy paste that here.
2010-03-10 06929, 2010
ruaok
lol
2010-03-10 06932, 2010
alastairp
it's only a single number :)
2010-03-10 06940, 2010
warp
ah
2010-03-10 06902, 2010
warp
8
2010-03-10 06915, 2010
alastairp
nice
2010-03-10 06915, 2010
ruaok
8 cores?
2010-03-10 06921, 2010
alastairp
4 + HT?
2010-03-10 06932, 2010
ruaok
or dual quad?
2010-03-10 06938, 2010
warp
core i7
2010-03-10 06946, 2010
warp
i'm guessing what alastairp said
2010-03-10 06955, 2010
warp
I only plugged one cpu into the motherboard.
2010-03-10 06905, 2010
ruaok
yep HT
2010-03-10 06943, 2010
warp
2800 MHz
2010-03-10 06909, 2010
warp
ruaok: I ordered a white case, so I could stick that musicbrainz sticker on it. but sadly that case wasn't in stock and I swapped it for a black one.
2010-03-10 06931, 2010
ruaok
why can't you put it on the black one?
2010-03-10 06941, 2010
warp
doesn't look very nice :)
2010-03-10 06955, 2010
ruaok
ah.
2010-03-10 06904, 2010
ruaok has a different sense of aethetics.
2010-03-10 06909, 2010
warp
:)
2010-03-10 06920, 2010
ruaok
over lunch I was talking about how there is an art to mismatching socks.
2010-03-10 06933, 2010
ruaok
there are combinations that don't work and ones that doe.
2010-03-10 06935, 2010
ruaok
do
2010-03-10 06956, 2010
ruaok
I mismatch socks, so I have no problem sticking a white sticker on a black puter
2010-03-10 06957, 2010
ruaok
:)
2010-03-10 06925, 2010
warp
I remember seth godin mentioning there is a company somewhere marketing socks to teenage girl, and they come in packs of 3 different socks (not pairs).
2010-03-10 06933, 2010
warp
girls
2010-03-10 06947, 2010
ruaok
yep.
2010-03-10 06904, 2010
ruaok
my doctor got some for xmas. she proudly wore them the day I came in.
2010-03-10 06910, 2010
warp
:D
2010-03-10 06917, 2010
ruaok
(I think those socks are lame, but that is just me)
2010-03-10 06907, 2010
ruaok
alastairp: remember the guy whom you gave my number to at hack day? songkick?
2010-03-10 06918, 2010
ruaok
he contacted me re the blog post.
2010-03-10 06925, 2010
ruaok
now that's 5 concert data providers.
2010-03-10 06927, 2010
ruaok
hmmm.
2010-03-10 06928, 2010
alastairp
oh, cool
2010-03-10 06935, 2010
warp
:D
2010-03-10 06941, 2010
ruaok
I do like the piece of feedback that someone left...
2010-03-10 06947, 2010
alastairp
I heard something about songkick recently?
2010-03-10 06900, 2010
alastairp
"we're now the biggest event provider"? or something
2010-03-10 06918, 2010
ruaok
instead of selling them the right to provide us with concert info, we should just sell them data licenses. and those who want to provide concert info, can.
2010-03-10 06943, 2010
warp
ruaok: sounds good, yeah.
2010-03-10 06953, 2010
warp
simple.
2010-03-10 06959, 2010
alastairp
oh yeah
2010-03-10 06903, 2010
ruaok
it removes the potential for conflicts with the tax authorties here.
2010-03-10 06929, 2010
alastairp
is there a problem with that?
2010-03-10 06906, 2010
ruaok
we have stated two form of income that we got a tax exempt OK on.
2010-03-10 06921, 2010
ruaok
if that changes we have to square that away with them.
2010-03-10 06924, 2010
alastairp
ah
2010-03-10 06930, 2010
ruaok
donations and data licenses.
2010-03-10 06944, 2010
ruaok
so, if we keep selling data licenses, we're in the clear.
2010-03-10 06920, 2010
navap
ruaok: I'm taking a look at the registration page and would like to change the Big Bold Scary Text a little :)
MusicBrainz has one account type for all users, including artists, labels and end users. If you represent an artist trying to correct your metadata, create an account here.
2010-03-10 06930, 2010
navap
I'm going to bold the entire thing except for "Please read our.."
have you guys seen that recent talk about more prose-like registration forms?
2010-03-10 06904, 2010
alastairp
"Hello, my name is [ ] and my email address is [ ]. Please create me an account with password [ ]"
2010-03-10 06929, 2010
ruaok
sounds like something for sissies. like Muz.
2010-03-10 06931, 2010
navap
That sounds a bit childish doesn't it?
2010-03-10 06932, 2010
ruaok
:-)
2010-03-10 06938, 2010
alastairp
rofl
2010-03-10 06948, 2010
alastairp
I think they were ruby coders
2010-03-10 06955, 2010
ruaok
nuff said.
2010-03-10 06925, 2010
ruaok
scheiss warmduscher...
2010-03-10 06928, 2010
navap
I think most people are very used to filling in forms that if you suddenly turned a registration form into a "paint by colour" page things would turn ugly :p
2010-03-10 06948, 2010
alastairp
navap: according to their statistics it was better
2010-03-10 06949, 2010
ruaok
lol
2010-03-10 06954, 2010
alastairp
I think they did an A/B test
2010-03-10 06956, 2010
pronik
alastairp: it was said they had a better turnaround rate, BUT I think it's not MusicBrainz' aim to make as many registrations as possible
2010-03-10 06901, 2010
warp
alastairp: I liked the way _they_ did that, but it's easy to mess up.
2010-03-10 06902, 2010
alastairp
pronik: true
2010-03-10 06913, 2010
ruaok
registration forms do appear to be a major stumbling block for some people.
2010-03-10 06915, 2010
pronik
rather active users and maybe even some registration-free collaboration
2010-03-10 06920, 2010
ruaok
they cause a lot of people to lose interest fast.
2010-03-10 06935, 2010
navap
Anyone have a link to this?
2010-03-10 06936, 2010
alastairp
wow
2010-03-10 06954, 2010
pronik
alastairp: wow about what?
2010-03-10 06906, 2010
alastairp
just saw that create account page.
2010-03-10 06908, 2010
alastairp
it's, uh, busy
2010-03-10 06955, 2010
navap
Ours?
2010-03-10 06916, 2010
ruaok
more like a fustercluck. :)
2010-03-10 06942, 2010
pronik reads http://www.expatsoftware.com/articles/2010/03/why-internationalization-is-hopelessly.html and wonders about how people manage to talk about i18n and barely scratch the surface
2010-03-10 06940, 2010
ruaok
"and incidentally how much smarter the GNU folks are than, say, you. And why you should be using emacs."
2010-03-10 06941, 2010
ruaok
lol
2010-03-10 06953, 2010
warp
emacs makes me cry.
2010-03-10 06949, 2010
ruaok
I always thought that emacs stood for "eight megs and continually swapping"
2010-03-10 06902, 2010
ruaok
until I saw that vi was taking 24M of ram one day. :)
2010-03-10 06911, 2010
ruaok
then again, that saying is... erm dated.
2010-03-10 06924, 2010
pronik
emacs saves me a lot of time at work :)
2010-03-10 06932, 2010
ruaok tries to not sound like the suspender-unix-beard guy from Dilbert.
2010-03-10 06943, 2010
pronik
especially compared to co-workers typing their perl code in eclipse + epic plugin
2010-03-10 06907, 2010
pronik
you know, indenting by HAND
2010-03-10 06930, 2010
pronik
instead of pressing tab somewhere in a line and have it align automagically
2010-03-10 06940, 2010
warp
both perl modes I have here for emacs indent some things the wrong way.
2010-03-10 06953, 2010
alastairp
ruaok: you're worrying about 24megs of ram?
2010-03-10 06912, 2010
pronik
warp: cperl-mode works fine for me
2010-03-10 06917, 2010
ruaok
alastairp: that saying comes from back in the day when computers had 8 megs of ram. :)
2010-03-10 06922, 2010
pronik
the one supplied with 23.1 emacs
2010-03-10 06956, 2010
Muz
ruaok: I objerct to that statement about it being for sissies. It doesn't have anywhere near enough ponies.
thought when I attempt to load a row from that I get:
2010-03-10 06927, 2010
ruaok
Attribute (last_modified) does not pass the type constraint because: Validation failed for 'DateTime' failed with value 2009-06-18 02:15:30.437431+00 (not isa DateTime)
2010-03-10 06948, 2010
ruaok
actually the problem is lastmodifed not, date_added, which is strange since they are defined to both be the same.
2010-03-10 06910, 2010
ruaok
what magic incantation do I need to get the code to load the dates?
2010-03-10 06912, 2010
aCiD2
can you paste your entity and model?
2010-03-10 06940, 2010
aCiD2
and while you do that, can anyone clarify http://gist.github.com/328484 ? Murdos says I broke a load of shit, but upgrade.sh seems to run for me
