for a chained controller, the return value of the root controller gets stashed into the stash.
2010-03-22 08112, 2010
ruaok
right?
2010-03-22 08120, 2010
luks
ruaok: what does 'keeping them around' mean? :)
2010-03-22 08121, 2010
ruaok
if so, what key name is it stashed in?
2010-03-22 08131, 2010
luks
uh, I don't know
2010-03-22 08135, 2010
ruaok
luks: cluttering up the propsal space with dead stuff.
2010-03-22 08138, 2010
luks
but I don't believe so
2010-03-22 08155, 2010
luks
ruaok: that's the point, there is no proposal space
2010-03-22 08122, 2010
luks
regarding catalyst, I think only stuff you stash manually gets stashes
2010-03-22 08126, 2010
navap
It means we reduce the clutter in the wiki by deleting lots of confusing and poorly written documentation pages.
2010-03-22 08140, 2010
ruaok is unclear on some concept for sure
2010-03-22 08142, 2010
navap
luks: Thanks for the label/catalog clarifcation
2010-03-22 08116, 2010
ruaok pedals for a burrito
2010-03-22 08127, 2010
dzan joined the channel
2010-03-22 08122, 2010
jensl joined the channel
2010-03-22 08152, 2010
brianfreud
ruaok: ding :)
2010-03-22 08151, 2010
brianfreud
It's just setting them as official dead+abandoned, closing any relevant tix requesting them, etc. Anyone can of course propose it newly in future, but this 'officially' closes out any 'stalled and wtf-is-the-status' proposals
2010-03-22 08116, 2010
warp
ruaok: I don't know the answer to your chained _load question.
2010-03-22 08146, 2010
dzann joined the channel
2010-03-22 08156, 2010
ffimon joined the channel
2010-03-22 08105, 2010
ffimon
does anyone know what is happening with musicbrainz-sharp
warp: right, that's what I mean about something in master
2010-03-22 08120, 2010
ruaok
Welcome everyone!
2010-03-22 08120, 2010
aCiD2
i'll have a look soon :)
2010-03-22 08122, 2010
ruaok
ruaok has changed the topic to: agenda: gsoc, review, schedule, agile, [what else?]
2010-03-22 08128, 2010
ruaok
hi murdos!
2010-03-22 08136, 2010
ruaok
right-o.
2010-03-22 08149, 2010
murdos
hi ruaok! hi all!
2010-03-22 08155, 2010
navap
Hey
2010-03-22 08103, 2010
ruaok
I'm seeing an awful lot of propsective gsoc'cers in here, so lets put that on the agenda and start there.
2010-03-22 08103, 2010
djce joined the channel
2010-03-22 08115, 2010
ruaok
dear gsoc potential students: do you have any questions?
2010-03-22 08120, 2010
ruaok
comments?
2010-03-22 08121, 2010
warp
I have two quick requests which I'll just add to the topic.
2010-03-22 08130, 2010
ruaok nods at warp
2010-03-22 08137, 2010
warp
warp has changed the topic to: agenda: gsoc, review, schedule, agile, makefile, pg sorting [what else?]
2010-03-22 08139, 2010
dzan
i have no questions :) easy right?
2010-03-22 08151, 2010
ruaok
good. :-)
2010-03-22 08102, 2010
warp
oh, release editor / artist credits..
2010-03-22 08103, 2010
Leftmost
I think for the time being, expectations are pretty clear.
2010-03-22 08104, 2010
ruaok
philip6137, Leftmost jensl?
2010-03-22 08109, 2010
jensl
yes?
2010-03-22 08110, 2010
warp
warp has changed the topic to: agenda: gsoc, review, schedule, agile, release editor, makefile, pg sorting [what else?]
2010-03-22 08114, 2010
warp
muaha
2010-03-22 08122, 2010
ruaok
do you have any qeustions regarding gsoc?
2010-03-22 08132, 2010
dzan
quick one maybe:
2010-03-22 08133, 2010
philip6137
I dont really have question :)
2010-03-22 08133, 2010
ruaok
the while team is assembled ready to answer questions. :)
2010-03-22 08133, 2010
jensl
yes one
2010-03-22 08145, 2010
ruaok
dzan first, jensl next.
2010-03-22 08149, 2010
dzan
2 people on mailinglist for android, me for android and philip6137 too, 4 total? or even more?
2010-03-22 08150, 2010
jensl
do your prefer to have a first official proposal quite early on google
2010-03-22 08102, 2010
jensl
so that you might get the chance to ask questions again
2010-03-22 08110, 2010
jdamcd
I am here too, sent to mailing list about the Android proposal
2010-03-22 08111, 2010
jensl
or just final one...
2010-03-22 08125, 2010
ruaok
dzan: I would expect more. its seems to be a popular suggestion.
2010-03-22 08140, 2010
ruaok
jensl: yes, the earlier the better.
2010-03-22 08141, 2010
warp
jensl: early is always better IMO.
2010-03-22 08150, 2010
ruaok
that way we can give you feedback.
2010-03-22 08153, 2010
jensl
ok
2010-03-22 08113, 2010
philip6137
do you have proposals for the other ideas ?
2010-03-22 08115, 2010
jensl
actually i discuss almost everything on the mailing list
2010-03-22 08125, 2010
ruaok
in general, those people who work with the community and adapt their proposals based on community feedback have better chances at being accepted.
2010-03-22 08137, 2010
ruaok
philip6137: see our ideas page.
2010-03-22 08147, 2010
ruaok
we're also very much open to you bringing your own idea in.
2010-03-22 08155, 2010
ruaok
and its ok to submit more than one proposal.
2010-03-22 08110, 2010
jensl
i gonna concentrate on the android proposal and won't submit any others
2010-03-22 08115, 2010
ruaok
last call for gsco questions.
2010-03-22 08132, 2010
navap wonders if students can collaborate on a proposal
2010-03-22 08142, 2010
jensl
i could also do iphone but from your replies i result that you prefer android
2010-03-22 08143, 2010
aCiD2
navap: yes but no
2010-03-22 08144, 2010
ruaok
navap: yes.
2010-03-22 08146, 2010
aCiD2
you'd do it like me and luks did
2010-03-22 08158, 2010
aCiD2
separate proposals, but heavily orientated around working together
2010-03-22 08117, 2010
ruaok
jensl: one think I am considering... if we don't get a third student interested in another topic, I would consider having one for android and one for iphone.
2010-03-22 08118, 2010
navap
So focus on two separate specific proposals, but work together to achieve both?
2010-03-22 08122, 2010
ruaok
but I am guessing that is unlikely.
2010-03-22 08136, 2010
ruaok
navap: we can pretty much do anything we want.
2010-03-22 08144, 2010
ruaok
include tell the students that we like what to put in their proposals.
2010-03-22 08100, 2010
ruaok
"gee, this guys says exactly what I am looking for. s/he's perfect!"
2010-03-22 08117, 2010
jensl
ruaok: ok, will mention that i can do the stuff also on the iphone
2010-03-22 08120, 2010
ruaok
and that is perfectly legit. google makes very few rules about what we can't do.
2010-03-22 08127, 2010
ruaok
jensl: ok.
2010-03-22 08132, 2010
ruaok
ok, onward. review from last week.
2010-03-22 08135, 2010
ruaok
warp: go!
2010-03-22 08135, 2010
dzan
you've got 3 slots?
2010-03-22 08139, 2010
dzan
oh sorry :)
2010-03-22 08142, 2010
ruaok
dzan: we've requested 3.
2010-03-22 08147, 2010
ruaok
np
2010-03-22 08156, 2010
warp
as you may have noticed, I spent almost the entire week on the release editor.
2010-03-22 08108, 2010
aCiD2
yay
2010-03-22 08113, 2010
Leftmost
Pour NGS?
2010-03-22 08116, 2010
ruaok
ruaok has changed the topic to: genda: review, schedule, agile, release editor, makefile, pg sorting [what else?]
2010-03-22 08122, 2010
ijabz joined the channel
2010-03-22 08124, 2010
warp
I tried to fit it in better with the existing js code, which made it much more modular... and better testable.
2010-03-22 08125, 2010
ruaok
warp: go something for us to look at?
2010-03-22 08152, 2010
warp
ruaok: it's not merged into next, but available from git.musicbrainz.org. I submitted it to codereview in three parts.
2010-03-22 08105, 2010
warp
so yes, please all have a look.
2010-03-22 08118, 2010
ruaok
ok, I should be able to get to some reviews later today.
2010-03-22 08126, 2010
ruaok
I can't wait to see in action. :)
2010-03-22 08138, 2010
aCiD2
on the review note.. I've got some that are almost a month old - could those please get looked at?:)
2010-03-22 08159, 2010
ruaok
aCiD2: gimme a list of what needs the most attention.
2010-03-22 08108, 2010
warp
aCiD2: I looked at everything in code review, but often I just don't have enough of a clue what's going on yet to say something sensible about it.
2010-03-22 08117, 2010
aCiD2
ruaok: none need attention, but it'd be nice just to clear it up
2010-03-22 08119, 2010
aCiD2
they aren't blocking me
2010-03-22 08130, 2010
ruaok
ok, I'll go by age then.
2010-03-22 08144, 2010
ruaok
anything else warp?
2010-03-22 08103, 2010
warp
ruaok: nothing which I didn't stick in the agenda seperately :)
