#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09612, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09617, 2010

      • xiainx joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09632, 2010

      • navap joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09623, 2010

      • pronik` joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09606, 2010

      • Aleezza joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09611, 2010

      • Aleezza
        hello
      • 2010-04-06 09622, 2010

      • ruaok
        DUH.
      • 2010-04-06 09631, 2010

      • ruaok
        navapa and I startted chatting in #musicbrainz
      • 2010-04-06 09635, 2010

      • ruaok
        sorry. join us there?
      • 2010-04-06 09610, 2010

      • alastairp joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09655, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09630, 2010

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09601, 2010

      • dzan joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09628, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09625, 2010

      • brianfreud
        <haiku>
      • 2010-04-06 09602, 2010

      • brianfreud
        Perfect is what you want
      • 2010-04-06 09626, 2010

      • brianfreud
        Perfect to you I shall give
      • 2010-04-06 09637, 2010

      • brianfreud
        Forever we wait
      • 2010-04-06 09640, 2010

      • brianfreud
        </haiku>
      • 2010-04-06 09647, 2010

      • alastairp
        heh
      • 2010-04-06 09648, 2010

      • alastairp
        so true
      • 2010-04-06 09619, 2010

      • alastairp
        except your first line is 6 :-P
      • 2010-04-06 09626, 2010

      • brianfreud knows the first stanza is 1 syllable too long :P
      • 2010-04-06 09642, 2010

      • brianfreud
        "Perfect you do want" :)
      • 2010-04-06 09605, 2010

      • alastairp
        perfect you do want, hmm?
      • 2010-04-06 09630, 2010

      • brianfreud
        I still like my bio quote version best; "When you place good in competition with perfect, if you only ever are willing to accept perfect, you'll never get anything. Strive for perfect, but accept good."
      • 2010-04-06 09630, 2010

      • brianfreud
        if only I could remember who said it :D
      • 2010-04-06 09642, 2010

      • navap
        Can someone please remind me why we have tracklists and mediums as separate entities?
      • 2010-04-06 09656, 2010

      • navap
        As opposed to them both being one entity.
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • navap
        On my documemntation page I've been debating whether or not to mention tracklists because mediums are the more obvious thing.
      • 2010-04-06 09610, 2010

      • nikki
        I think the idea was to reduce duplication (and to not actually show tracklists)... but luks would know
      • 2010-04-06 09622, 2010

      • navap
        But tracklists are actually viewable on their own, mediums aren't, so now I'm thinking of mentioning tracklists and not mentioning mediums.
      • 2010-04-06 09604, 2010

      • navap
        Yeah I know luks mentioned hiding tracklists, that would definitely make my job easier. I wouldn't need to mention them at all.
      • 2010-04-06 09657, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09641, 2010

      • navap
        I'm off to bed.
      • 2010-04-06 09657, 2010

      • navap
        Can someone see if they can satisfy Frederic's question. Searching gmail for "Don't forget, for all practical purposes (or at least when it comes to crediting an artist)" (with quotes) should find the start of the relevant discussion.
      • 2010-04-06 09602, 2010

      • navap
      • 2010-04-06 09603, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09647, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09628, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09643, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09657, 2010

      • luks
        heh, that's the first gmail link I've seen
      • 2010-04-06 09602, 2010

      • luks
        and it actually works :)
      • 2010-04-06 09638, 2010

      • avi| joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09601, 2010

      • luks
        the main reason for having tracklists as a standalone entity is that you can see a list of releases on which the tracklist was released
      • 2010-04-06 09612, 2010

      • avi| has left the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09634, 2010

      • luks
        e.g. this was released as CD1 of the album, CD3 of a box set and a bonus disc of a special edition of the album
      • 2010-04-06 09659, 2010

      • luks
        but I'm starting to think that the merging should be kind of automatic
      • 2010-04-06 09638, 2010

      • luks
        so users basically can't change the tracklist
      • 2010-04-06 09657, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09628, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09617, 2010

      • nikki
        luks: but if any of the tracks were credited differently, it'd be a different track list even though all the recordings are the same :/
      • 2010-04-06 09610, 2010

      • xiainx joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09640, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09652, 2010

      • avi| joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09604, 2010

      • avi| has left the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09605, 2010

      • luks
        nikki: I'd make the automatic merge work based on recording ids
      • 2010-04-06 09618, 2010

      • luks
        so if you have a list of the same recordings, it's the same tracklist
      • 2010-04-06 09633, 2010

      • luks
        well "merge"
      • 2010-04-06 09644, 2010

      • luks
        it would not really be a merge
      • 2010-04-06 09655, 2010

      • luks
        it's just for having a list of all releases with the tracklist
      • 2010-04-06 09615, 2010

      • luks
        so there would be a page with all releases that have mediums with these recordings
      • 2010-04-06 09621, 2010

      • nikki
        I see...
      • 2010-04-06 09637, 2010

      • nikki grumbles at wikipedia and their hatred of redirect pages
      • 2010-04-06 09637, 2010

      • luks
        do you think such approach would work?
      • 2010-04-06 09652, 2010

      • nikki
        I think so... would it just fetch any mediums with those recordings and not use the tracklist thing we currently have?
      • 2010-04-06 09629, 2010

      • luks
        yes
      • 2010-04-06 09636, 2010

      • nikki
        I like that idea more
      • 2010-04-06 09658, 2010

      • avi| joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09611, 2010

      • avi| has left the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • brianfreud joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • dzan joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • pronik joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • navap joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • murdos joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • rafl joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • warp joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • luks joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • iarp joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • aCiD2 joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • nikki joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09602, 2010

      • xiainx joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09652, 2010

      • jdamcd joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09658, 2010

      • navap
        luks: Okay so the difference between a medium and tracklist is that the former are essentially just a format and title.
      • 2010-04-06 09635, 2010

      • navap
        So I think I'm going to merge my medium description and examples into the release section. The examples both illustrate the same thing anyway, they both have the same wording.
      • 2010-04-06 09605, 2010

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok \o/
      • 2010-04-06 09659, 2010

      • luks
        navap: I think tracklists as separate entities will really go away from the user interface
      • 2010-04-06 09607, 2010

      • navap
        Until they do...they should have some sort of description. If they are removed then that the tracklist section can also just be removed.
      • 2010-04-06 09607, 2010

      • luks
        yep
      • 2010-04-06 09625, 2010

      • ruaok
        tod, everyone!
      • 2010-04-06 09654, 2010

      • navap
        So then are you planning on dropping that concept of finding out which releases a specific tracklist appearst on?
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • navap
        TOD!
      • 2010-04-06 09623, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: I had a quick look at jqtouch and phonegap
      • 2010-04-06 09626, 2010

      • luks
        navap: no
      • 2010-04-06 09634, 2010

      • ruaok
        ya?
      • 2010-04-06 09636, 2010

      • navap
        That's really the only reason I feel it's important to document what a tracklist is.
      • 2010-04-06 09650, 2010

      • navap
        luks: So then what do you mean that tracklists are going away from the UI?
      • 2010-04-06 09600, 2010

      • navap
        Where else are they visible?
      • 2010-04-06 09605, 2010

      • luks
        navap: it will stay, but it will be actually better than the explicit tracklist model
      • 2010-04-06 09623, 2010

      • luks
        I was thinking of a "medium" page
      • 2010-04-06 09631, 2010

      • luks
        which says that it's CD X from release Y
      • 2010-04-06 09649, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: on my ipod jqtouch tries to emulate the native widget set of iphone os.
      • 2010-04-06 09650, 2010

      • luks
        and it also appears on releases ...
      • 2010-04-06 09657, 2010

      • navap
        luks: What about when a tracklist is released on different mediums?
      • 2010-04-06 09634, 2010

      • nikki finds "tod" without the dashes a bit disturbing :P
      • 2010-04-06 09635, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: it gets reasonably close, but there is still enough different to be annoying (which is always the case with these types of solutions).
      • 2010-04-06 09650, 2010

      • ruaok
        agreed.
      • 2010-04-06 09652, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: and from the looks of it there is no way to use native widgets with phonegap
      • 2010-04-06 09601, 2010

      • ruaok
        it is sort of like running a java gui app?
      • 2010-04-06 09602, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: so IMO both are out.
      • 2010-04-06 09610, 2010

      • ruaok
        its close, but not close enough?
      • 2010-04-06 09642, 2010

      • ruaok
        ok, thanks for your thoughts. those align with my reservations fairly closely.
      • 2010-04-06 09651, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: ofcourse, to some extent the same could be said for picard on OS X, etc..
      • 2010-04-06 09616, 2010

      • aCiD2 waves
      • 2010-04-06 09618, 2010

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2010-04-06 09623, 2010

      • ruaok
        warp: for sure. :)
      • 2010-04-06 09627, 2010

      • ruaok
        aCiD2: TOD
      • 2010-04-06 09637, 2010

      • ruaok
        have you seen the UX doc that we hammered out last night?
      • 2010-04-06 09648, 2010

      • aCiD2
        nope, i had no idea about that!
      • 2010-04-06 09650, 2010

      • aCiD2
        linky?
      • 2010-04-06 09622, 2010

      • ruaok
        in email.
      • 2010-04-06 09633, 2010

      • aCiD2
        where is this email?
      • 2010-04-06 09633, 2010

      • ruaok
        google docs is really nice for collaborative editing.
      • 2010-04-06 09635, 2010

      • aCiD2
        oh
      • 2010-04-06 09637, 2010

      • aCiD2
        you just sent it
      • 2010-04-06 09646, 2010

      • ruaok
        yea, sorry.
      • 2010-04-06 09603, 2010

      • ruaok
        google docs is really nice for collaborating before a page gets stuck onto the wiki.
      • 2010-04-06 09620, 2010

      • ruaok
        and after the next meeting we should push the doc to the wiki.
      • 2010-04-06 09624, 2010

      • warp is afk, dinner
      • 2010-04-06 09627, 2010

      • aCiD2
        do you want feedback now, or later?
      • 2010-04-06 09640, 2010

      • ruaok
        your call. this was mostly FYI and its WIP.
      • 2010-04-06 09655, 2010

      • aCiD2
        ok, i'll rustle up some feedback now
      • 2010-04-06 09619, 2010

      • ruaok
        but I feel that we've finally made some progress. alisa is good at picking up a role and acting it out. and then intelligently telling us how her character failed.
      • 2010-04-06 09603, 2010

      • ruaok wonders if luks wants a peek too
      • 2010-04-06 09629, 2010

      • ruaok
        maybe we should create a developers alias/account that we can share docs to that includes a bunch of us.
      • 2010-04-06 09656, 2010

      • luks
        what's the problem with giving read-only access to anyone?
      • 2010-04-06 09619, 2010

      • ruaok
        nothing. I want to give read-write access to a known group of people
      • 2010-04-06 09639, 2010

      • jdamcd
        ruaok: I've added a timeline and a couple more mock-ups to my proposal
      • 2010-04-06 09644, 2010

      • navap
        ruaok: If you create a MB Developers group in your google contacts you can add people to that and then easily just click 'all' to give them all access in the google doc.
      • 2010-04-06 09629, 2010

      • navap
        Unfortunately I don't think you can sync the access to the group itself, just individual people. But at least it makes it easier to add people that way.
      • 2010-04-06 09642, 2010

      • ruaok
        navap: that sounds like what I am looking for. ;)
      • 2010-04-06 09650, 2010

      • ruaok
        jdamcd: I'll take a look this afternoon.
      • 2010-04-06 09654, 2010

      • ruaok
        thanks
      • 2010-04-06 09635, 2010

      • aCiD2
        I actually think Google Wave works nicely for this type of document editing
      • 2010-04-06 09644, 2010

      • aCiD2
        one of the rare cases it's actually useful
      • 2010-04-06 09613, 2010

      • ruaok
        lol. interesting. good point.
      • 2010-04-06 09624, 2010

      • ruaok
        we should try that next time this comes up.