#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • Leftmost
        aCiD2, also ping
      • 2010-08-02 21455, 2010

      • aCiD2
        poing
      • 2010-08-02 21404, 2010

      • ruaok
        aCiD2: pioing
      • 2010-08-02 21422, 2010

      • aCiD2
        easily one of the best sounds
      • 2010-08-02 21423, 2010

      • ruaok
        send me a timesheet asap and I can get the wire transfer put in today.
      • 2010-08-02 21449, 2010

      • aCiD2
        oh yea - do you want it as normal, with hours and such?
      • 2010-08-02 21417, 2010

      • ruaok
        first and foremost the total number of hours. then the accounting of such, yes
      • 2010-08-02 21422, 2010

      • Leftmost
        Taking care of the code review stuff now, sorry. How can I change the add and remove stuff to POST?
      • 2010-08-02 21433, 2010

      • aCiD2
        ok
      • 2010-08-02 21456, 2010

      • aCiD2
        Leftmost: use req->params instead of query_params
      • 2010-08-02 21447, 2010

      • Leftmost
        Hmm. That's what it's doing now.
      • 2010-08-02 21451, 2010

      • ruaok
        fuck, for some reason I didn't get paid. at least I know whose fault that is. :-(
      • 2010-08-02 21426, 2010

      • aCiD2
        lol
      • 2010-08-02 21443, 2010

      • ruaok
        feh. I didn't know they had a every month starting, now but skip the next month. WTF?
      • 2010-08-02 21453, 2010

      • ruaok
        (payment schedule)
      • 2010-08-02 21452, 2010

      • aCiD2
        ok sent, i think that's correct
      • 2010-08-02 21436, 2010

      • ruaok
        +4 minutes. heh.
      • 2010-08-02 21442, 2010

      • ruaok rounds
      • 2010-08-02 21441, 2010

      • ianmcorvidae
        O/
      • 2010-08-02 21402, 2010

      • ianmcorvidae
        (adding a release to MB... appropriate :P)
      • 2010-08-02 21403, 2010

      • ruaok runs off to the accountants/bank
      • 2010-08-02 21409, 2010

      • Leftmost
        aCiD2, I'm confused still as to how to do POST vs. GET. It's a GET function now, but uses ->params.
      • 2010-08-02 21421, 2010

      • aCiD2
        he better have rounded that up
      • 2010-08-02 21434, 2010

      • Leftmost
        Is it in the Catalyst docs? Should I just look there?
      • 2010-08-02 21444, 2010

      • aCiD2
        Leftmost: there is no difference between a post and a get function
      • 2010-08-02 21452, 2010

      • aCiD2
        the end point is the same, so you end up at the same action
      • 2010-08-02 21459, 2010

      • aCiD2
        what you need to change however, is how you get there
      • 2010-08-02 21411, 2010

      • aCiD2
        you post to something with a <form> that has method="POST"
      • 2010-08-02 21422, 2010

      • aCiD2
        (so a button). We can fake this better in the future with javascript
      • 2010-08-02 21449, 2010

      • Leftmost
        Oh, okay. So since nothing leads to add() or remove() in view-multiple-collections, I don't need to worry about it at that point?
      • 2010-08-02 21454, 2010

      • aCiD2
        so, You'll have something like: <form action="[% c.uri_for_action('remove-link') %]" method="post"><input type="submit" value="[% l('Remove from collection') %]" /></form>
      • 2010-08-02 21423, 2010

      • aCiD2
        yep, if they are unused you don't need to do anything but the change from query_params to params
      • 2010-08-02 21449, 2010

      • Leftmost
        Alright. I'll post a new diff in a minute, then.
      • 2010-08-02 21457, 2010

      • jensl joined the channel
      • 2010-08-02 21405, 2010

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2010-08-02 21409, 2010

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2010-08-02 21447, 2010

      • pronik``` joined the channel
      • 2010-08-02 21432, 2010

      • aCiD2
      • 2010-08-02 21421, 2010

      • pronik
      • 2010-08-02 21446, 2010

      • aCiD2
        heh
      • 2010-08-02 21430, 2010

      • aCiD2
        brb, switching to laptop
      • 2010-08-02 21432, 2010

      • warp
        hello!
      • 2010-08-02 21436, 2010

      • oliverc` joined the channel
      • 2010-08-02 21455, 2010

      • Leftmost
        Hello!
      • 2010-08-02 21417, 2010

      • jensl
        hi
      • 2010-08-02 21418, 2010

      • ruaok
        <BANG>
      • 2010-08-02 21418, 2010

      • MBChatLogger
        MBChatLogger has changed the topic to: http://musicbrainz.org/#devel
      • 2010-08-02 21423, 2010

      • ruaok
        hello everyone!
      • 2010-08-02 21442, 2010

      • jdamcd
        hello!
      • 2010-08-02 21443, 2010

      • ruaok
        gah. crazy freaking weekend. thankfully I only have to work this week. :)
      • 2010-08-02 21454, 2010

      • aCiD2|laptop
        :)
      • 2010-08-02 21459, 2010

      • ruaok
        lets start with gsoc this time.
      • 2010-08-02 21413, 2010

      • ruaok
        jdamcd: tell us how your week went!
      • 2010-08-02 21429, 2010

      • ruaok
        ruaok has changed the topic to: agenda: gsoc, review, beta3
      • 2010-08-02 21455, 2010

      • jdamcd
        okay, got exception handling for connections etc. done, so the app is much more usable now
      • 2010-08-02 21439, 2010

      • kurtjx
        hello
      • 2010-08-02 21446, 2010

      • jdamcd
        some minor UI stuff and refactoring, and started on the service for POST
      • 2010-08-02 21452, 2010

      • ruaok waves at kurtjx
      • 2010-08-02 21407, 2010

      • ruaok
        ruaok has changed the topic to: agenda: gsoc, review, qmu, beta3
      • 2010-08-02 21416, 2010

      • kurtjx
        sorry was baby chasing... here now
      • 2010-08-02 21423, 2010

      • jdamcd
        still need to work around the authentication problem though, that's the major issue for me right now
      • 2010-08-02 21441, 2010

      • ruaok
        have you tried some of the workarounds?
      • 2010-08-02 21429, 2010

      • ijabz
        jdamcd I got authenication working okay in my test
      • 2010-08-02 21436, 2010

      • ijabz
        what is the problem ?
      • 2010-08-02 21440, 2010

      • jdamcd
        I've a bunch of sources for potential work arounds, one of which looks promising, not been able to do much on that with the lack of test server though
      • 2010-08-02 21442, 2010

      • warp
        ijabz: android
      • 2010-08-02 21434, 2010

      • aCiD2|laptop
        UK
      • 2010-08-02 21435, 2010

      • ruaok
        jdamcd: yeah, wasn't good timing for the test server to drive up the coast.
      • 2010-08-02 21439, 2010

      • ruaok
        but its home now.
      • 2010-08-02 21414, 2010

      • ruaok
        keep me posted about this problem. its literally the first road-block we've encountered in this project. which is really nice.
      • 2010-08-02 21425, 2010

      • oliverc` joined the channel
      • 2010-08-02 21425, 2010

      • enjayhch
        hello from Scotland!
      • 2010-08-02 21440, 2010

      • ruaok
        enjayhch: 'hello!
      • 2010-08-02 21443, 2010

      • jdamcd
        ruaok: will do
      • 2010-08-02 21449, 2010

      • ruaok
        jensl: how about you?
      • 2010-08-02 21404, 2010

      • oliverc`
        sorry about that random uk, wireless playing up :)
      • 2010-08-02 21414, 2010

      • jensl
        all detail pages and text searches finished, submitting tags and ratings nearly ready, will be finished latest on wednesday, then going for redesign of rating and work on the barcode scanning as the last feature missing
      • 2010-08-02 21415, 2010

      • ruaok
        nice. you guys are kicking ass. :-)
      • 2010-08-02 21422, 2010

      • ruaok
        any stumbling blocks for you?
      • 2010-08-02 21433, 2010

      • jensl
        no, barcode scanning will get hard but I try my best
      • 2010-08-02 21457, 2010

      • jensl
        will try to find an open source solution and improve that to work on the 2G
      • 2010-08-02 21415, 2010

      • enjayhch
        barcode scanning would be amazing :)
      • 2010-08-02 21437, 2010

      • ruaok
        jensl: ok, great. good luck.
      • 2010-08-02 21440, 2010

      • jensl
        enjaych: will definitely be in, just the 2G is difficult since it got no auto-zoom
      • 2010-08-02 21443, 2010

      • jensl
        thx
      • 2010-08-02 21446, 2010

      • ruaok
        Leftmost: how about you?
      • 2010-08-02 21432, 2010

      • Leftmost
        I've got a working web service for collections.
      • 2010-08-02 21443, 2010

      • ruaok
        \ΓΈ/
      • 2010-08-02 21459, 2010

      • Leftmost
        It's got maybe a bit of expansion to do, but I'm not scheduled to be done with it yet, so that's fine.
      • 2010-08-02 21400, 2010

      • oliverc`
        and we still haven't got his first patch in though :(
      • 2010-08-02 21407, 2010

      • oliverc`
        i really want that in by tomorrow if we can
      • 2010-08-02 21408, 2010

      • warp
        anything merged into next yet?
      • 2010-08-02 21411, 2010

      • Leftmost
        I've updated the review request.
      • 2010-08-02 21400, 2010

      • enjayhch
        arg, internet is broken - ping time gone up to 1100ms - might disappear
      • 2010-08-02 21405, 2010

      • ruaok
        Leftmost: anything blocking you?
      • 2010-08-02 21409, 2010

      • ruaok
        enjayhch: oh noes!
      • 2010-08-02 21415, 2010

      • Leftmost
        ruaok, on what front?
      • 2010-08-02 21422, 2010

      • ruaok
        anything.
      • 2010-08-02 21444, 2010

      • jensl
        leftmost: any update concerning the collection service?
      • 2010-08-02 21408, 2010

      • Leftmost
        I have a couple more questions for warp about allowing user editing from the web service, but that's it.
      • 2010-08-02 21426, 2010

      • jensl
        ok
      • 2010-08-02 21436, 2010

      • ijabz
        leftmost is the api simialr to the way warps done posting stuff (i,e xml submission)
      • 2010-08-02 21428, 2010

      • Leftmost
        The idea is to keep it pretty uniform with the rest of the web service.
      • 2010-08-02 21431, 2010

      • ruaok
        would it be a good idea for leftmost to write some docs on how its supposed to work
      • 2010-08-02 21432, 2010

      • ruaok
        ?
      • 2010-08-02 21437, 2010

      • Leftmost
        Probably.
      • 2010-08-02 21443, 2010

      • ijabz
        would be nice to see somthing
      • 2010-08-02 21415, 2010

      • ruaok
        Leftmost: please do that then asap so that jensl can code to that.
      • 2010-08-02 21420, 2010

      • Leftmost
        Okay.
      • 2010-08-02 21443, 2010

      • ruaok
        ok, gsoc is looking good then.
      • 2010-08-02 21448, 2010

      • ruaok
        warp: how about you?
      • 2010-08-02 21458, 2010

      • ruaok
        ruaok has changed the topic to: agenda: review, qmu, beta3
      • 2010-08-02 21424, 2010

      • warp
        I spent most of the week writing QUnit tests for the javascript bits of the release editor.
      • 2010-08-02 21443, 2010

      • warp
        in the course of doing so discovered and fixed a few bugs.
      • 2010-08-02 21453, 2010

      • warp
        this is all on code review, I think in two or three parts.
      • 2010-08-02 21411, 2010

      • ruaok
        excellent.
      • 2010-08-02 21423, 2010

      • ruaok
        do you have a feeling for the unknowns in the RE yet?
      • 2010-08-02 21425, 2010

      • warp
        today I've started on the 'Add Release' part of the release editor... (so starting empty instead of with an existing release)
      • 2010-08-02 21431, 2010

      • ruaok
        do you think there are more gremlins hiding in there?
      • 2010-08-02 21420, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: the hardest parts will be to keep the associations between tracks and recordings when people edit stuff with the track parser.
      • 2010-08-02 21445, 2010

      • ruaok
        when are you planning to attack that?
      • 2010-08-02 21458, 2010

      • ruaok
        if its an unknown it might be good to start on it sooner.
      • 2010-08-02 21402, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: we have NO code for that yet. I guess one part of that will also be the interface at the end of the wizard where people can doublecheck the edits they've made (preview).
      • 2010-08-02 21405, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: there are heaps of bugs from nikki and others about the release editor in jira, I was planning to attack some of those first.
      • 2010-08-02 21453, 2010

      • ruaok
        hmm. ok.
      • 2010-08-02 21410, 2010

      • ruaok
        I'd like you to look at this unknown as soon as you feel comfortable getting to it, ok?
      • 2010-08-02 21428, 2010

      • ruaok
        I'm getting uneasy about more hiding dragons. there are a LOT of people watching us now.
      • 2010-08-02 21442, 2010

      • ruaok
        anything else warp?
      • 2010-08-02 21453, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: ok. I think my issues is mostly that it doesn't feel right to look at that issue when the release editor itself still crashes when you look at it funny. (ok, it's not that bad, but you get my drift).
      • 2010-08-02 21404, 2010

      • ruaok nods.
      • 2010-08-02 21427, 2010

      • ruaok
        use your best judgement on how to proceed. you know what I am concerned about now. :)
      • 2010-08-02 21449, 2010

      • ruaok
        aCiD2: how about you? after 2 months you BETTER have something to report. :)
      • 2010-08-02 21453, 2010

      • oliverc`
        ahaha
      • 2010-08-02 21454, 2010

      • warp
        it inherently involves reasonably fuzzy stuff, with code guessing the intent of humans. that kind of stuff needs lots of testing, so the release editor should just work to be able to do that testing.
      • 2010-08-02 21400, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: yes.
      • 2010-08-02 21413, 2010

      • ruaok
        warp: ok
      • 2010-08-02 21423, 2010

      • warp
        ruaok: I'll try to fix the most important issues this week, and we'll look at it again next week.
      • 2010-08-02 21428, 2010

      • oliverc`
        Well, i've just carried on hacking away at little tasks mostly, which recently has slowed me down. For those unaware, we got together last thursday to restructure who's working on what
      • 2010-08-02 21444, 2010

      • ruaok
        oliverc`: I'll cover that in a minute.
      • 2010-08-02 21452, 2010

      • oliverc`
        I've taken over /ws/1 now and think I've made some great progress on, in only a few days
      • 2010-08-02 21456, 2010

      • ruaok
        (the beta3 bits)
      • 2010-08-02 21407, 2010

      • oliverc`
        you can now load releases into picard that are "simple" (ie, 1 medium)
      • 2010-08-02 21411, 2010

      • ruaok
        thats awesome. I'm glad to hear that.
      • 2010-08-02 21419, 2010

      • oliverc`
        there are a few more inc parameters to cover, then I'm looking at searching
      • 2010-08-02 21430, 2010

      • ruaok
        I'm glad you're testing with picard along the way. very clever.
      • 2010-08-02 21443, 2010

      • ruaok
        searching is cake.
      • 2010-08-02 21446, 2010

      • oliverc`
        I'd like to get some tag developers to help poke it with me soon
      • 2010-08-02 21451, 2010

      • oliverc`
        ijabz interested? :)
      • 2010-08-02 21453, 2010

      • ijabz
        oliverc thats on test is it ?
      • 2010-08-02 21400, 2010

      • oliverc`
        i can put it on test tonight