but yea, I'd suggest Padre if you insist on having something like an IDE :) For me, I wouldn't go back from something like Emacs or GVim these days though, but it is a learning curve for sure
2010-08-03 21555, 2010
kurtjx
i'll look at padre, but i may just do emacs
2010-08-03 21513, 2010
kurtjx
i've been in the eclipse world a bit
2010-08-03 21528, 2010
kurtjx
but it seems the EGit plugin for eclipse just doesn't work right
2010-08-03 21547, 2010
kurtjx
which i suppose is not a deal breaker, but annoying
2010-08-03 21505, 2010
kurtjx
hehe "a formal proof"
2010-08-03 21532, 2010
aCiD2
:)
2010-08-03 21537, 2010
kurtjx tags for later reading
2010-08-03 21528, 2010
aCiD2
really these days I tend to keep most stuff in my head though and always have search.cpan.org open (or perldoc)
2010-08-03 21554, 2010
kurtjx
i recall some perl frameworks being mentioned - i know catalyst was one
2010-08-03 21559, 2010
kurtjx
and i think there was another...
2010-08-03 21505, 2010
aCiD2
Moose
2010-08-03 21513, 2010
aCiD2
Moose and Catalyst are definitely essential reading
2010-08-03 21539, 2010
kurtjx
thnx aCiD2
2010-08-03 21517, 2010
Leftmost
I use a combination of vim and gedit, depending on what I'm doing.
2010-08-03 21551, 2010
aCiD2
and what configuration the moon is in
2010-08-03 21536, 2010
kurtjx
can somebody enlighten me as to why there's a musicbrainz_db and a musicbrainz_db_raw ???
2010-08-03 21507, 2010
nikki
I think they live on different servers or something
2010-08-03 21530, 2010
kurtjx
oh funky - so it's more about hardware
2010-08-03 21547, 2010
nikki
and the raw database has stuff that's not part of the actual mb data (like user collections)
2010-08-03 21514, 2010
kurtjx
so the test db queries i'm doing
2010-08-03 21521, 2010
kurtjx
all use musicbrainz_db
2010-08-03 21535, 2010
kurtjx
then tables are named musicbrainz.artist or musicbrainz.release
2010-08-03 21537, 2010
warp
kurtjx: _raw contains huge amounts of data in production. it contains the full edit history and all user specific data.
2010-08-03 21552, 2010
kurtjx
ok
2010-08-03 21552, 2010
nikki
edits have been moved to the raw db now?
2010-08-03 21524, 2010
kurtjx
so musicbrainz_db is somehow a filtered version of db_raw?
2010-08-03 21526, 2010
aCiD2
nikki: yea
2010-08-03 21538, 2010
nikki
ah right
2010-08-03 21546, 2010
aCiD2
kurtjx: musicbrainz_db is the data, musicbrainz_db_raw is the musicbrainz side of the data
2010-08-03 21547, 2010
warp
kurtjx: no, just different tables.
2010-08-03 21548, 2010
aCiD2
if that makes sense
2010-08-03 21556, 2010
kurtjx
k
2010-08-03 21557, 2010
nikki doesn't look at the edit table very often so wasn't aware of that
2010-08-03 21522, 2010
ruaok
nikki: any sign of the package yet?
2010-08-03 21526, 2010
nikki
not yet
2010-08-03 21513, 2010
ruaok
should be coming this week
2010-08-03 21518, 2010
nikki nods
2010-08-03 21506, 2010
alastairp
lucky
2010-08-03 21517, 2010
alastairp
samsung galaxy vibrant releases here on friday
2010-08-03 21534, 2010
alastairp
I've been putting off getting a number :)
2010-08-03 21511, 2010
Leftmost
aCiD2, still around?
2010-08-03 21521, 2010
aCiD2
sure, what's up
2010-08-03 21542, 2010
Leftmost
Just wondering if there's anything else that you can think of needs doing for the review. I think I've addressed all of the concerns relevant to the diff in question.
2010-08-03 21533, 2010
Leftmost
Also, as a heads up, I'm going to send you and warp a bit of information on the way I'm doing collection editing in WS2 to see if the architecture makes sense.
2010-08-03 21531, 2010
aCiD2
sounds good, I'll have a look at the review tomorrow. hopefully we're at a mergable state now
2010-08-03 21518, 2010
Leftmost
Okay.
2010-08-03 21518, 2010
ruaok
its amazing. the DB server is sitting at a load of 20 and still responding pretty fast.
