given that we're looking for things to pass to acid2, it makes sense for acid2 to finish it.
2010-10-13 28621, 2010
aCiD2
ey? I did it
2010-10-13 28641, 2010
aCiD2
wrong review maybe?
2010-10-13 28649, 2010
ruaok
no, brainfart.
2010-10-13 28651, 2010
ruaok
nm. sorry.
2010-10-13 28653, 2010
aCiD2
:)
2010-10-13 28655, 2010
ruaok
plz to ignore that.
2010-10-13 28600, 2010
ruaok
#facepalm
2010-10-13 28601, 2010
navap wonders why we don't have a facepalm unicode character
2010-10-13 28637, 2010
ruaok
but we have SMILING CAT FACE WITH HEART-SHAPED EYES
2010-10-13 28647, 2010
ruaok
and CAT FACE WITH TEARS OF JOY
2010-10-13 28653, 2010
ruaok rolls his eyes
2010-10-13 28628, 2010
aCiD2
hahaha, seriously?
2010-10-13 28631, 2010
navap
Oh wow, those are real characters!?
2010-10-13 28641, 2010
aCiD2
those can't be.
2010-10-13 28627, 2010
aCiD2
Ok, I'm thinking of the "appears on" page for artists
2010-10-13 28651, 2010
aCiD2
at the moment, that uses the release of everything as the year, but for l_artist_recording, that doesn't make sense - a recording has multiple releases
2010-10-13 28612, 2010
aCiD2
So I either don't bother with finding the year by release (and instead just display the recording and hope the begin date of the relationship is ok)
Storing first release data has been requested before, but that might be a post-NGS thing?
2010-10-13 28623, 2010
ruaok
good man. :)
2010-10-13 28636, 2010
navap
ruaok: Wow..
2010-10-13 28637, 2010
ruaok
aCiD2: it something that loads of people would like.
2010-10-13 28643, 2010
aCiD2
dunno, an hour or 2
2010-10-13 28649, 2010
aCiD2
it's not much more work
2010-10-13 28658, 2010
ruaok
hmmm, ok.
2010-10-13 28617, 2010
aCiD2
I'm already half way through the appearences table (it shows the recording/work/release/release group, but it'd be nicer to show just the release as it currently does)
2010-10-13 28620, 2010
ruaok
can you move that an any other schema changes to the top of your priority pile?
2010-10-13 28627, 2010
navap
Would you also store first release data for releases then?
2010-10-13 28632, 2010
ruaok
I would very much like to get all the schema changes finalized and freeze the schema.
2010-10-13 28655, 2010
ruaok
navap: unless there is a compelling reason like what aCiD2 just said, then no.
2010-10-13 28658, 2010
aCiD2
navap: we already have that
2010-10-13 28601, 2010
aCiD2
well, it's in the release group
2010-10-13 28611, 2010
aCiD2
And my changes for that are in review
2010-10-13 28601, 2010
navap
Ah of course. So a tagger could easily obtain the first release date of a release if necessary.
2010-10-13 28651, 2010
aCiD2
yea, we have that in pre NGS too
2010-10-13 28655, 2010
aCiD2
it's just not exposed in the web service
2010-10-13 28624, 2010
ruaok can smell a feature request ticket coming
2010-10-13 28619, 2010
aCiD2
ARGH. Muscle by my album has been twitching all damn day
2010-10-13 28623, 2010
aCiD2
and it's getting annoying now
2010-10-13 28654, 2010
ruaok
album?
2010-10-13 28609, 2010
ruaok
have you ever taken a yoga class?
2010-10-13 28616, 2010
aCiD2
umm
2010-10-13 28617, 2010
aCiD2
elbow
2010-10-13 28619, 2010
aCiD2
hehe
2010-10-13 28635, 2010
aCiD2
and no, I haven't taken a yoga class, I've done/read a little about yoga
2010-10-13 28635, 2010
ruaok
oh. you're whacking off too much. :)
2010-10-13 28639, 2010
aCiD2
haha
2010-10-13 28645, 2010
ruaok
tennis elbow.
2010-10-13 28602, 2010
ruaok
anyone who sits at a computer for hours a day should be taking yoga classes.
2010-10-13 28611, 2010
aCiD2
agreed with you there
2010-10-13 28614, 2010
aCiD2
and it's not tennis elbow, that hurts
2010-10-13 28620, 2010
aCiD2
this is just a tiny muscle spasming
2010-10-13 28648, 2010
outsidecontext joined the channel
2010-10-13 28657, 2010
ruaok
because all the muscles around it are pissy. and that takes it out on the little guy
that's what the artist page is currently looking like, thoughts?
2010-10-13 28627, 2010
outsidecontext waves back
2010-10-13 28649, 2010
navap
aCiD2: IMO the table looks a bit odd.
2010-10-13 28606, 2010
aCiD2
not on your own there
2010-10-13 28646, 2010
hawke__
aCiD2: date range should use – instead of —
2010-10-13 28650, 2010
navap
I'm a fan of how the artist relationships at the top look.
2010-10-13 28610, 2010
navap
Hey my favicons! :)
2010-10-13 28644, 2010
alastairp
aCiD2: you should take some time off
2010-10-13 28650, 2010
aCiD2
alastairp++
2010-10-13 28605, 2010
aCiD2
hawke__: which entity is that?
2010-10-13 28621, 2010
alastairp
it's seriously not worth working with bad arms
2010-10-13 28630, 2010
alastairp
go see a physio
2010-10-13 28634, 2010
navap
aCiD2: The date range in the sidebar
2010-10-13 28644, 2010
aCiD2
navap: I said which html entity, not where is it :P
2010-10-13 28650, 2010
hawke__
aCiD2: en dash…
2010-10-13 28651, 2010
aCiD2
alastairp: mm, it's cause my chair is too low I'd imagine
2010-10-13 28656, 2010
aCiD2
or more, the desk is too high
2010-10-13 28608, 2010
hawke__
–
2010-10-13 28621, 2010
alastairp
I refuse to work at bad desks these days
2010-10-13 28647, 2010
aCiD2
alastairp: if I do that, I don't get paid
2010-10-13 28653, 2010
ruaok
aCiD2: you should fix that asap. lest it fuck your body up.
2010-10-13 28653, 2010
aCiD2
if I don't get paid, I die :)
2010-10-13 28657, 2010
aCiD2
i should
2010-10-13 28608, 2010
ruaok
I'm with alastairp on the ergonomically correct stance.
2010-10-13 28609, 2010
alastairp
arms 90 degrees at the elbow or I won't s work
2010-10-13 28632, 2010
aCiD2
I'm not at all against that, i don't have the means to get a new desk easily
2010-10-13 28637, 2010
aCiD2
no car, no where local, etc
2010-10-13 28649, 2010
alastairp
phone books
2010-10-13 28653, 2010
alastairp
:)
2010-10-13 28630, 2010
ruaok
my desk is on 2x4 pieces of wood to elevate it to the right height.
2010-10-13 28633, 2010
aCiD2
the desk is too high, not low though
2010-10-13 28643, 2010
ruaok
looks a litlte ghetto, but it works right.
2010-10-13 28648, 2010
ruaok
then your chair is too low.
2010-10-13 28655, 2010
aCiD2
no, because my feet are flat
2010-10-13 28602, 2010
ruaok
time for a saw. :)
2010-10-13 28603, 2010
aCiD2
and it doesn't go any higher anyway
2010-10-13 28617, 2010
aCiD2
the desk is on 3 legs because it's resting on a bit of the wall that juts out
2010-10-13 28624, 2010
aCiD2
which is a real bummer, because they are adjustable legs :(
2010-10-13 28635, 2010
ruaok
take the wall out.
2010-10-13 28636, 2010
aCiD2
but we've sawed that corner off now
2010-10-13 28640, 2010
ruaok
your 'rents will never noticed.
2010-10-13 28644, 2010
aCiD2
heh
2010-10-13 28647, 2010
ruaok
-d
2010-10-13 28648, 2010
hawke__
aCiD2: “founded: [label]” seems weird to me. I would expect founded: to be a date.
2010-10-13 28651, 2010
aCiD2
still missing a leg, which is kinda important :)
2010-10-13 28655, 2010
hawke__
Maybe “Label(s) founded:”?
2010-10-13 28600, 2010
ruaok
aCiD2: beer bottles
2010-10-13 28604, 2010
aCiD2
hawke__: ignore that, nikki is incharge of writing them
2010-10-13 28607, 2010
aCiD2
this is just my test data
2010-10-13 28612, 2010
aCiD2
i'm more looking at the display/layout
2010-10-13 28613, 2010
hawke__
k
2010-10-13 28626, 2010
hawke__
What’s the favicions (aside from a spelling error)?
2010-10-13 28631, 2010
aCiD2
lol
2010-10-13 28645, 2010
aCiD2
that's just a bug, those 2 headers shouldn't be there
2010-10-13 28621, 2010
navap
aCiD2: I'm torn between whether or not to use a table. I think it looks funky to have a table, but the major advantage is that there's an easily readable artist column.
2010-10-13 28626, 2010
hawke__
aCiD2: I think perhaps the headings in the table should be swapped, with the darker heading for date/title/artist and the lighter for the individual appearance types.
2010-10-13 28644, 2010
navap
Several rows of 'Foo by Bar' just doesn't work as well because of the different lengths of text.
2010-10-13 28604, 2010
aCiD2
indeed
2010-10-13 28630, 2010
aCiD2
hawke__: can't really do that, it's used as a subheading in the tracklist too
2010-10-13 28638, 2010
aCiD2
(between mediums)
2010-10-13 28609, 2010
hawke__
aCiD2: Hmm. It just looks like a “more important” heading than the top-level heading.
2010-10-13 28602, 2010
aCiD2 nods
2010-10-13 28606, 2010
aCiD2
I'd say it is, too
2010-10-13 28654, 2010
aCiD2
alright, enough work for today
2010-10-13 28610, 2010
ruaok
I've got more output for you.
2010-10-13 28619, 2010
ruaok
loooooads more. :-)
2010-10-13 28640, 2010
navap
What's the deal with Javascript::Closure? How do I get it installed?
