#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • nikki thinks it's debatable :P
      • 2011-02-03 03403, 2011

      • reosarevok
        But mr. dictator himself just said yes? :p
      • 2011-02-03 03412, 2011

      • nikki
        I mean that they're useful for sorting
      • 2011-02-03 03413, 2011

      • ruaok
        that doesnt mean its not debatable.
      • 2011-02-03 03418, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Oh, ok
      • 2011-02-03 03424, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Just in case
      • 2011-02-03 03439, 2011

      • reosarevok
        You know, so we don't get gummy bear secret police in plainclothes beating us
      • 2011-02-03 03442, 2011

      • reosarevok
        :)
      • 2011-02-03 03455, 2011

      • ruaok
        you forget the "benevolent" in BDFL
      • 2011-02-03 03409, 2011

      • ruaok
        my secret police comes and GIVES you gummy bears
      • 2011-02-03 03414, 2011

      • nikki
        aww
      • 2011-02-03 03456, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Ok
      • 2011-02-03 03402, 2011

      • reosarevok
        So what do we need to debate?
      • 2011-02-03 03414, 2011

      • reosarevok
        nikki, why would we not use sortname?
      • 2011-02-03 03426, 2011

      • nikki
        so I can find japanese artists for once :P
      • 2011-02-03 03420, 2011

      • nikki
        (and chinese artists are even worse, they have so many different spellings/pronunciations that one surname ends up all over the alphabet)
      • 2011-02-03 03425, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Maybe the problem is the sort only with latin itself then?
      • 2011-02-03 03440, 2011

      • nikki
        it's the way our sortnames are done in general
      • 2011-02-03 03401, 2011

      • nikki
        everywhere sorts things differently, but we can only store one
      • 2011-02-03 03457, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Any good idea?
      • 2011-02-03 03458, 2011

      • reosarevok
        :p
      • 2011-02-03 03418, 2011

      • nikki
        add a type field to aliases
      • 2011-02-03 03439, 2011

      • nikki
        have "sortname" as a type, then use the language field to set sortnames for particular locales
      • 2011-02-03 03451, 2011

      • ruaok
        not a bad idea
      • 2011-02-03 03451, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Wel
      • 2011-02-03 03453, 2011

      • reosarevok
        *well
      • 2011-02-03 03402, 2011

      • nikki
        (and search hint could be another type, so we'd know which aliases are proper ones and which are just gibberish we added)
      • 2011-02-03 03403, 2011

      • reosarevok
        We kinda need that type field anyway
      • 2011-02-03 03404, 2011

      • reosarevok
        To separate
      • 2011-02-03 03408, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Yeah, what nikki said
      • 2011-02-03 03434, 2011

      • nikki
        (and birth name would make a good type too, for artists who don't use a load of performance names, but also don't use their birth name... which is what discogs has afaik)
      • 2011-02-03 03407, 2011

      • reosarevok doesn't like that last idea too much, although he can understand why it could be used
      • 2011-02-03 03415, 2011

      • reosarevok doesn't like how birth names work on discogs
      • 2011-02-03 03425, 2011

      • reosarevok
        (that is, barely if at all)
      • 2011-02-03 03430, 2011

      • nikki doesn't like how we duplicate everything just to add a surname
      • 2011-02-03 03440, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Well
      • 2011-02-03 03406, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Name w/o surname -> NGS artist credit for birth name?
      • 2011-02-03 03433, 2011

      • reosarevok
        I just don't like the idea of treating artists differently because they have more or less performance names
      • 2011-02-03 03436, 2011

      • nikki
        but they normally don't use the birth name
      • 2011-02-03 03401, 2011

      • nikki
        (e.g. madonna, alizee)
      • 2011-02-03 03412, 2011

      • reosarevok
        And don't like the idea of losing the current legal name use
      • 2011-02-03 03437, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Hmm
      • 2011-02-03 03439, 2011

      • nikki
        I've run into quite a few problems because we split too many names
      • 2011-02-03 03443, 2011

      • reosarevok looks confused
      • 2011-02-03 03447, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Please explain :)
      • 2011-02-03 03437, 2011

      • reosarevok makes use of performance names + legal names extensively and is interested on the matter
      • 2011-02-03 03441, 2011

      • nikki
        I've seen one release with credits for the artist's full name, and a re-release with credits for the performance name
      • 2011-02-03 03403, 2011

      • nikki
        so who do I link to?
      • 2011-02-03 03412, 2011

      • reosarevok
        One for each, on NGS?
      • 2011-02-03 03436, 2011

      • nikki
        but it's one composer (or whatever the credit was), not composed by real name & performance name
      • 2011-02-03 03436, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Hmm, true
      • 2011-02-03 03450, 2011

      • nikki
        and one thing I've seen way too many times is an artist who uses different characters from their real name, but with the same pronunciation... then who do I use when the credit is in latin? they're both exactly the same in latin characters :/
      • 2011-02-03 03452, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Why can't the music industry be constant? :(
      • 2011-02-03 03437, 2011

      • nikki
        in those cases I just didn't add the credits at all :/
      • 2011-02-03 03443, 2011

      • reosarevok
        :/
      • 2011-02-03 03450, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Yeah, sounds complicated
      • 2011-02-03 03431, 2011

      • nikki
        and nowhere else I know treats them as separate artists, it's just us adding separate entries because the names aren't the same
      • 2011-02-03 03420, 2011

      • nikki
        I would mention wikipedia, but of course they don't use separate pages
      • 2011-02-03 03427, 2011

      • nikki
        they hate the fact a page is used at all :P
      • 2011-02-03 03442, 2011

      • reosarevok
        I probably wouldn't mind having them all as one artist *after* we get artist credits for ARs
      • 2011-02-03 03430, 2011

      • reosarevok
        But that still means doing different things for "performance names" and "performance names, but not so much"
      • 2011-02-03 03439, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Where do you put the limit?
      • 2011-02-03 03405, 2011

      • nikki
        we'll have that problem anyway with artist credits, what's an artist credit and what's a performance name?
      • 2011-02-03 03447, 2011

      • reosarevok
        I know
      • 2011-02-03 03405, 2011

      • reosarevok
        And that's a great question :p
      • 2011-02-03 03410, 2011

      • nikki
        but for me it's basically if they have separate "careers" or not
      • 2011-02-03 03449, 2011

      • reosarevok
        How separate, though?
      • 2011-02-03 03426, 2011

      • reosarevok
        If an artist releases a record under name A, another under (completely different) name B, then back to name A, but the three records are stylistically the same
      • 2011-02-03 03432, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Is that one career?
      • 2011-02-03 03441, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Also, I have one artist who uses two names, one for making beats, and another to rap on them
      • 2011-02-03 03459, 2011

      • reosarevok
        (and uses both on his albums at the same time)
      • 2011-02-03 03408, 2011

      • reosarevok
        (not clearly related names at all, btw)
      • 2011-02-03 03418, 2011

      • reosarevok
        How do you call that?
      • 2011-02-03 03420, 2011

      • nikki
        without knowing the artist I don't think I could really say, I can think of one artist who did a single under a different name that I would probably consider the same because the song was included on her other albums (still credited to the other name, but clearly not completely separate)
      • 2011-02-03 03443, 2011

      • nikki
        and for the beats/rap one, they'd need to be separate for now anyway, but if there's a clear distinction, then I could see why they'd be kept separate
      • 2011-02-03 03408, 2011

      • reosarevok
        And in the end I didn't really get if I should jira the sortname for browse thing or not :p
      • 2011-02-03 03435, 2011

      • nikki
        oh, more, when you have things like "Foolongnameius Bar" and "Foo Bar" as a performance name, who do you use when it's credited to "F. Bar" or "Bar"? (likewise "if you have Foolongnameius Bar" and "F. Bar", who do you use for "Foo Bar"?)
      • 2011-02-03 03421, 2011

      • reosarevok should have a kid and name him Foolongnameius
      • 2011-02-03 03410, 2011

      • reosarevok
        You mean like it being "Full Name + Surname" and "Short Name + Surname"?
      • 2011-02-03 03417, 2011

      • nikki
        yeah
      • 2011-02-03 03404, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Those should probably be together
      • 2011-02-03 03423, 2011

      • reosarevok
        The main question would be "who's the main artist for the mbid, and who are artist credits" though
      • 2011-02-03 03443, 2011

      • nikki
        and if you don't pick the full name as the main artist, how do you enter it? :)