#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • reosarevok
        Pie charts for countries?
      • 2011-06-08 15900, 2011

      • ocharles
        meh, still prefer histograms
      • 2011-06-08 15901, 2011

      • reosarevok
        No way
      • 2011-06-08 15903, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        presumably also disc id stuff, PUID stuff, release stuff, data quality stuff, etc.
      • 2011-06-08 15911, 2011

      • nikki
        not for countries
      • 2011-06-08 15913, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Ok
      • 2011-06-08 15914, 2011

      • nikki
        for gender/type
      • 2011-06-08 15916, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Then yes
      • 2011-06-08 15917, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Could be
      • 2011-06-08 15924, 2011

      • nikki
        we could use the space to the right for graphs :P
      • 2011-06-08 15943, 2011

      • reosarevok
        nikki vs. the whitespace
      • 2011-06-08 15945, 2011

      • reosarevok
        FIGHT!
      • 2011-06-08 15959, 2011

      • nikki
        damn right!
      • 2011-06-08 15900, 2011

      • ruaok
      • 2011-06-08 15915, 2011

      • ocharles
        ruaok: tag is missing
      • 2011-06-08 15907, 2011

      • ruaok
        modbot still complains. :(
      • 2011-06-08 15910, 2011

      • ocharles
        gr http://musicbrainz.org/edit/14491584 can't approve that, it's meant to be fixed
      • 2011-06-08 15919, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        but re: graphs on that page, if someone makes me an issue on jira it can happen at some arbitrary time in the future :P
      • 2011-06-08 15940, 2011

      • ocharles
        ruaok: how does the latest modbot whine look?
      • 2011-06-08 15953, 2011

      • ruaok
      • 2011-06-08 15908, 2011

      • ruaok
        not nearly as whiney as before, but stlill whiney.
      • 2011-06-08 15921, 2011

      • ocharles
        ruaok: I mean you forgot the tag from the blog post
      • 2011-06-08 15927, 2011

      • ruaok
        oh.
      • 2011-06-08 15932, 2011

      • ruaok
        ha. context. who needs it. :)
      • 2011-06-08 15949, 2011

      • ocharles
        :P
      • 2011-06-08 15913, 2011

      • ruaok
        fixed
      • 2011-06-08 15955, 2011

      • ocharles
        ruaok: sweet, not whingey at all, just 3 failures now
      • 2011-06-08 15908, 2011

      • ruaok
        just TWO hourly emails. :(
      • 2011-06-08 15916, 2011

      • ruaok
        now that hobbes joined the choir
      • 2011-06-08 15903, 2011

      • ocharles
        ruaok: your tag is wrong too
      • 2011-06-08 15908, 2011

      • ocharles
        I don't think you pulled
      • 2011-06-08 15918, 2011

      • ruaok
        whoops.
      • 2011-06-08 15920, 2011

      • ocharles
        you tagged the june 1st release as the june 8th release
      • 2011-06-08 15926, 2011

      • ruaok
        feh.
      • 2011-06-08 15907, 2011

      • ocharles
        git tag -d v-2011-06-08-ngs-bug-fixes
      • 2011-06-08 15909, 2011

      • ocharles
        then retag and push
      • 2011-06-08 15917, 2011

      • ocharles
        I've deleted the tag from git.mb
      • 2011-06-08 15927, 2011

      • ruaok
        done
      • 2011-06-08 15949, 2011

      • ocharles
        still doesn't look right :)
      • 2011-06-08 15920, 2011

      • ocharles
        hang on..
      • 2011-06-08 15932, 2011

      • ocharles
        you haven't pushed it
      • 2011-06-08 15933, 2011

      • ruaok
      • 2011-06-08 15933, 2011

      • ocharles
        something is still wrong with that - http://git.musicbrainz.org/gitweb/?p=musicbrainz-… clicking the tag here takes you to something on june 1st
      • 2011-06-08 15936, 2011

      • ocharles
        git tag -d v-2011-06-08-ngs-bug-fixes; git fetch origin; git tag -s v-2011-06-08-ngs-bug-fixes c8f7013560113ce7071b5e0b99346d896d20bd8f; git push origin v-2011-06-08-ngs-bug-fixes
      • 2011-06-08 15934, 2011

      • nikki
        someone removed the relationships tab for recordings but didn't remove the relationships page
      • 2011-06-08 15955, 2011

      • ocharles
        nikki: that was luks work, and I was going to comment on whether on not that's correct
      • 2011-06-08 15903, 2011

      • ocharles
        I don't see much of a problem with keeping the page though
      • 2011-06-08 15917, 2011

      • nikki
        what's the point of having a page that's not linked to?
      • 2011-06-08 15933, 2011

      • nikki
        either it's being used or it's clutter :P
      • 2011-06-08 15935, 2011

      • ocharles
        the fact that removing it is effort, mainly
      • 2011-06-08 15942, 2011

      • ocharles
        it's easier to just keep it
      • 2011-06-08 15933, 2011

      • reosarevok
        ocharles: yay for ending at the work now! :D
      • 2011-06-08 15939, 2011

      • ocharles
        :)
      • 2011-06-08 15945, 2011

      • nikki
        hmm.
      • 2011-06-08 15959, 2011

      • reosarevok
        That + seeing the work rels in the recording overview -> lot of saved time
      • 2011-06-08 15901, 2011

      • nikki wonders if "was written by" shouldn't just be "writer", like "was composed by" becomes "composer"
      • 2011-06-08 15909, 2011

      • ocharles
        nikki: +1
      • 2011-06-08 15913, 2011

      • reosarevok would support that
      • 2011-06-08 15946, 2011

      • ocharles
        ruaok: please run the above commands so I can go read :)
      • 2011-06-08 15947, 2011

      • nikki wonders if she should just edit it... I probably did include it in the link phrase stuff I did anyway :P
      • 2011-06-08 15953, 2011

      • ruaok
        done, ocharles
      • 2011-06-08 15956, 2011

      • ocharles
        ta
      • 2011-06-08 15903, 2011

      • ocharles
        yes, that's correct now, thanks!
      • 2011-06-08 15904, 2011

      • reosarevok
        The only problem I could see is that it looks even more like "lyricist" for the easily confused people
      • 2011-06-08 15906, 2011

      • reosarevok
        But still
      • 2011-06-08 15909, 2011

      • ruaok
        did upgrade.sh rfinish?
      • 2011-06-08 15912, 2011

      • ruaok
        sweet.
      • 2011-06-08 15913, 2011

      • ocharles
        yea
      • 2011-06-08 15918, 2011

      • ruaok
        good.
      • 2011-06-08 15920, 2011

      • ruaok
        happy reading.
      • 2011-06-08 15926, 2011

      • ocharles
        (:
      • 2011-06-08 15915, 2011

      • murdos
        luks: I think I've understood why discogs ARs migration failed: discogs.dat is using discogs release ids as identifiers, while ngs-ars.pl is using MB url ids...
      • 2011-06-08 15942, 2011

      • murdos
        but it has been broken for a long time, and none has noticed it :/
      • 2011-06-08 15909, 2011

      • nikki
        :(
      • 2011-06-08 15910, 2011

      • bitmap
        is something being done about the discogs links? I've stopped removing them manually because it's too tedious
      • 2011-06-08 15913, 2011

      • murdos
        I'm trying to write a script that will redo what should have been done during migration
      • 2011-06-08 15942, 2011

      • bitmap
        that would be great!
      • 2011-06-08 15909, 2011

      • reosarevok
        indeed
      • 2011-06-08 15914, 2011

      • shultz joined the channel
      • 2011-06-08 15911, 2011

      • nikki
        :(
      • 2011-06-08 15930, 2011

      • nikki
        internal server error trying to add a disc id :/
      • 2011-06-08 15937, 2011

      • nikki
        guess I won't be ripping this cd any time soon then
      • 2011-06-08 15941, 2011

      • nikki tries on test and see "... SELECT DISTNCT ..."
      • 2011-06-08 15929, 2011

      • nikki wonders who modified it without checking that it worked
      • 2011-06-08 15923, 2011

      • ruaok joined the channel
      • 2011-06-08 15941, 2011

      • nikki prods reosarevok
      • 2011-06-08 15943, 2011

      • nikki
        err
      • 2011-06-08 15944, 2011

      • nikki prods ruaok
      • 2011-06-08 15954, 2011

      • reosarevok
        disc IDs broken cause of typo
      • 2011-06-08 15900, 2011

      • ruaok
        lovel.y
      • 2011-06-08 15907, 2011

      • nikki
      • 2011-06-08 15957, 2011

      • ruaok
        wow.
      • 2011-06-08 15911, 2011

      • ocharles
        ruaok: what's up?
      • 2011-06-08 15922, 2011

      • ruaok
      • 2011-06-08 15935, 2011

      • ruaok
        how did *that* pass our tests??
      • 2011-06-08 15943, 2011

      • ruaok
        *and* our review?
      • 2011-06-08 15903, 2011

      • ocharles
        guess we have no tests that touch find_by_artist_track_count
      • 2011-06-08 15925, 2011

      • ocharles
        production pushed
      • 2011-06-08 15911, 2011

      • ruaok
        logging in to carl
      • 2011-06-08 15904, 2011

      • ruaok
        astro ready
      • 2011-06-08 15929, 2011

      • ocharles
        done
      • 2011-06-08 15921, 2011

      • ruaok
        pingu ready
      • 2011-06-08 15942, 2011

      • ocharles
        done
      • 2011-06-08 15950, 2011

      • ruaok
        back.
      • 2011-06-08 15952, 2011

      • ocharles
        hrm, still broke..
      • 2011-06-08 15903, 2011

      • nikki refreshes
      • 2011-06-08 15905, 2011

      • ocharles checks
      • 2011-06-08 15908, 2011

      • nikki sees releases now
      • 2011-06-08 15913, 2011

      • nikki
        heh
      • 2011-06-08 15916, 2011

      • ocharles
        it's broke here
      • 2011-06-08 15920, 2011

      • nikki
        cached?
      • 2011-06-08 15925, 2011

      • ruaok
        I see releases.
      • 2011-06-08 15928, 2011

      • ruaok
        clear memcached?
      • 2011-06-08 15932, 2011

      • ocharles
        oh, test.mb :)
      • 2011-06-08 15954, 2011

      • ruaok
        lol
      • 2011-06-08 15908, 2011

      • nikki
        danke schön
      • 2011-06-08 15911, 2011

      • nikki rips the cd
      • 2011-06-08 15916, 2011

      • ruaok
        lol
      • 2011-06-08 15926, 2011

      • ocharles
        bitte
      • 2011-06-08 15914, 2011

      • ocharles
        ok, back to bed
      • 2011-06-08 15916, 2011

      • ocharles
        :P
      • 2011-06-08 15937, 2011

      • ruaok
        thx
      • 2011-06-08 15940, 2011

      • ocharles
        np
      • 2011-06-08 15948, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        suddenly I don't have the musicbrainz_collate function
      • 2011-06-08 15949, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        weird
      • 2011-06-08 15947, 2011

      • nikki
        wasn't it renamed recently?
      • 2011-06-08 15953, 2011

      • nikki
        or would that not affect it?
      • 2011-06-08 15902, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        you might be thinking of unaccent
      • 2011-06-08 15907, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        which I think was changing? I'm not sure
      • 2011-06-08 15913, 2011

      • nikki
        oh, hm
      • 2011-06-08 15918, 2011

      • nikki
        I thought someone mentioned functions too
      • 2011-06-08 15922, 2011

      • nikki wasn't paying much attention
      • 2011-06-08 15956, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        okay, third time trying this damn thing
      • 2011-06-08 15923, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        this time I recompiled the whole extension, maybe that's what it needed
      • 2011-06-08 15904, 2011

      • ianmcorvidae
        must have installed a new libicu or something, who even knows