-
ruaok
I would've purchased your miles from you.
2011-12-01 33530, 2011
-
ruaok
its not too late.
2011-12-01 33531, 2011
-
ruaok
:)
2011-12-01 33549, 2011
-
ocharles
well it's too late tonight, that's for sure :P
2011-12-01 33507, 2011
-
ruaok
I'm missing 2060 miles for 2011. otherwise I go back to "we spit on you
2011-12-01 33512, 2011
-
ruaok
" section.
2011-12-01 33525, 2011
-
ocharles
with the 2000 miles, what do you get?
2011-12-01 33532, 2011
-
ocharles
economy plus?
2011-12-01 33533, 2011
-
ruaok
less spitting. :)
2011-12-01 33545, 2011
-
ruaok
yes, and priority boarding you dont have to fight all the idiots.
2011-12-01 33500, 2011
-
ocharles
heh
2011-12-01 33518, 2011
-
ruaok
you can open an account, credit your last time and then sell me the miles.
2011-12-01 33524, 2011
-
ruaok
that would solve it for me. :)
2011-12-01 33527, 2011
-
reosarevok
:p
2011-12-01 33540, 2011
-
reosarevok
ruaok, can't you just fly and visit some friends? :p
2011-12-01 33544, 2011
-
ocharles
you have to do it by the end of the year?
2011-12-01 33501, 2011
-
ruaok
the flying has to be done by the end of the year.
2011-12-01 33504, 2011
-
ruaok
and I'm done flying.
2011-12-01 33509, 2011
-
ocharles
i meant the crediting
2011-12-01 33524, 2011
-
ruaok
i dunno how long it takes to get credit.
2011-12-01 33550, 2011
-
ruaok
2011-12-01 33552, 2011
-
ruaok
sign up here.
2011-12-01 33504, 2011
-
ruaok
I can get you your ticket number for getting credit for your flight.
2011-12-01 33511, 2011
-
ruaok
I'll purchase the miles off you.
2011-12-01 33527, 2011
-
ocharles
can you email me the link and anything relative so I can look at it tomorrow?
2011-12-01 33535, 2011
-
ruaok
ok
2011-12-01 33540, 2011
-
ocharles
just in the middle of fiddly bookbrainz testing right now, don't want to lose my trail of thought
2011-12-01 33546, 2011
-
ruaok
k
2011-12-01 33544, 2011
-
reosarevok
Who would have imagined
2011-12-01 33553, 2011
-
reosarevok
It seems actually using the twitter works
2011-12-01 33554, 2011
-
reosarevok
:p
2011-12-01 33538, 2011
-
reosarevok
We keep getting new followers and stuff
2011-12-01 33553, 2011
-
reosarevok wonders how many of them actually read us but still
2011-12-01 33523, 2011
-
ruaok
just posting anything gets you followers.
2011-12-01 33535, 2011
-
ruaok
for many years I had more followers than posts. :)
2011-12-01 33552, 2011
-
reosarevok
heh
2011-12-01 33510, 2011
-
reosarevok
We have 6 times more followers than posts
2011-12-01 33538, 2011
-
ruaok
nice.
2011-12-01 33527, 2011
-
reosarevok
Erm
2011-12-01 33532, 2011
-
reosarevok
wtf
2011-12-01 33557, 2011
-
reosarevok
ocharles, did you put something in test that removes an RG too if the only release in it is canceled?
2011-12-01 33523, 2011
-
ocharles
reosarevok: sounds possible
2011-12-01 33528, 2011
-
reosarevok
Oh
2011-12-01 33531, 2011
-
reosarevok
Cool
2011-12-01 33542, 2011
-
reosarevok
I guess this kinda fixes the bug I found in MB
2011-12-01 33543, 2011
-
reosarevok
:)
2011-12-01 33549, 2011
-
reosarevok will do a second test
2011-12-01 33530, 2011
-
reosarevok
heh
2011-12-01 33542, 2011
-
reosarevok
ocharles, that fixes a bug with RG dates then :)
2011-12-01 33554, 2011
-
reosarevok
(if add is canceled, it keeps the year)
2011-12-01 33510, 2011
-
ocharles
ouch
2011-12-01 33512, 2011
-
ocharles
but yay
2011-12-01 33538, 2011
-
ocharles
this is why I hate denormalising databases because "it's more efficient" with no evidence of a need to be more efficient
2011-12-01 33557, 2011
-
reosarevok
Hmm?
2011-12-01 33509, 2011
-
reosarevok fails at words
2011-12-01 33513, 2011
-
reosarevok
What's denormalising? :)
2011-12-01 33549, 2011
-
kepstin
well, normal forms in database reduce the duplication in tables by separating things apart and then using links between them
2011-12-01 33512, 2011
-
ianmcorvidae
I think that may confuse him more :P
2011-12-01 33513, 2011
-
kepstin
so he's saying that the date shouldn't have been on the release group at all, but rather have been just read from the releases, I guess?
2011-12-01 33520, 2011
-
ianmcorvidae
yeah
2011-12-01 33543, 2011
-
ianmcorvidae
I think so; I'm fairly sure there's a date thing in release_group_meta which is just updated from the included releases
2011-12-01 33512, 2011
-
kepstin knew that databases course would be good for something, eventually ;)
2011-12-01 33519, 2011
-
ianmcorvidae
hah
2011-12-01 33529, 2011
-
ocharles
right, the release group date is derivable from other information, so you don't need to store it
2011-12-01 33535, 2011
-
reosarevok
Oh, yeah
2011-12-01 33538, 2011
-
ianmcorvidae
(but we do)
2011-12-01 33542, 2011
-
reosarevok
I was pretty confused when I saw we did
2011-12-01 33554, 2011
-
ocharles
now you have the same bit of information twice, so you have to manually update it - the database can all ready keep that in check for you
2011-12-01 33502, 2011
-
reosarevok
Speaking of manually updating stuff
2011-12-01 33516, 2011
-
reosarevok
ocharles, mind throwing away the covers for releases with 00000000000000 barcode
2011-12-01 33517, 2011
-
reosarevok
?
2011-12-01 33543, 2011
-
ocharles
that'll go away once we nuke barcodes
2011-12-01 33556, 2011
-
reosarevok
Oh, true, you plan to nuke it completely
2011-12-01 33538, 2011
-
ruaok joined the channel
2011-12-01 33557, 2011
-
ocharles
no, the collective "you" does :)
2011-12-01 33548, 2011
-
reosarevok
Well, yes
2011-12-01 33557, 2011
-
reosarevok
But if the individual you doesn't
2011-12-01 33501, 2011
-
reosarevok
It doesn't matter :p
2011-12-01 33543, 2011
-
ocharles
semantics man!
2011-12-01 33559, 2011
-
ocharles
the irony that that sentence is missing a comma amuses me, too
2011-12-01 33519, 2011
-
kepstin
go, go, semantics man!
2011-12-01 33552, 2011
-
reosarevok
Someone make a semantics man meme
