#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • ruaok
        thats it. no bad part. :)
      • 2011-12-05 33932, 2011

      • ruaok
        at least I dont think linking to another MB enabled site is bad, right?
      • 2011-12-05 33934, 2011

      • ocharles wonders what new AR there is
      • 2011-12-05 33941, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Same
      • 2011-12-05 33941, 2011

      • ocharles
        we already have reviews and purchase links
      • 2011-12-05 33900, 2011

      • reosarevok
        We can just RFC for showing it on the sidebar as "artistxite"
      • 2011-12-05 33912, 2011

      • Leftmost
        Where's the FLAC? :P
      • 2011-12-05 33914, 2011

      • ruaok
        maybe there isn't one. its on my list of things to investigate.
      • 2011-12-05 33926, 2011

      • Leftmost shuts up.
      • 2011-12-05 33940, 2011

      • ruaok
        Leftmost: I suggested it to them but 7 digital is the backend for their service and they feel a bit limited by what they can supply.
      • 2011-12-05 33950, 2011

      • ruaok
        thats it for me.
      • 2011-12-05 33912, 2011

      • reosarevok
        ruaok, you forgot telling everyone that Europe is amazing and they should move there
      • 2011-12-05 33918, 2011

      • ruaok
        I've recharged. had tapas. had mandelh�rnchen. now all is well. :)
      • 2011-12-05 33930, 2011

      • ocharles
        we'll change that
      • 2011-12-05 33932, 2011

      • ocharles
        don't you worry
      • 2011-12-05 33947, 2011

      • ruaok
        reosarevok: my GF loved barcelona and really liked hamburg.
      • 2011-12-05 33904, 2011

      • ruaok
        I'm slowly trying to develop a plan for us to move to barcelona. :)
      • 2011-12-05 33905, 2011

      • CallerNo6 joined the channel
      • 2011-12-05 33914, 2011

      • ruaok
        k, enough for me.
      • 2011-12-05 33920, 2011

      • ruaok
        who wants to go next?
      • 2011-12-05 33925, 2011

      • ocharles defers to warp
      • 2011-12-05 33927, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Spain? Really? I hope you don't want to open a company :p (slowest place in EU to do so)
      • 2011-12-05 33931, 2011

      • ruaok
        warp, go!
      • 2011-12-05 33937, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Yes, warp, go!
      • 2011-12-05 33945, 2011

      • ruaok
        reosarevok: that is a very good consideration.
      • 2011-12-05 33945, 2011

      • andreypopp joined the channel
      • 2011-12-05 33901, 2011

      • ruaok
        my residence and country where MB is hosted might be two different questions.
      • 2011-12-05 33907, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Their / our bureaucracy is nuts
      • 2011-12-05 33910, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Or so I have read
      • 2011-12-05 33915, 2011

      • reosarevok
        In any case, not a meeting issue
      • 2011-12-05 33930, 2011

      • ruaok
        over to ecuador!
      • 2011-12-05 33933, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Feel free to ping me to do research if you ever need it
      • 2011-12-05 33943, 2011

      • ruaok
        reosarevok: thanks! I may very well do that. :)
      • 2011-12-05 33946, 2011

      • warp
        woops
      • 2011-12-05 33900, 2011

      • warp
        ok, I'll be quick, seeing as there is lots in the topic.
      • 2011-12-05 33941, 2011

      • warp
        I had a good week, lots of small tickets. If I'm using jira correctly 22 tickets assigned to me were resolved between monday last week and now.
      • 2011-12-05 33955, 2011

      • warp
        a lot of those are duplicates and cannot reproduce, but still, happy to see so many closed :)
      • 2011-12-05 33922, 2011

      • warp
        I've also worked on the editable webservice a bit.
      • 2011-12-05 33959, 2011

      • warp
        the proof-of-concept EDIT_LABEL_EDIT webservice is done, and I am now changing the crontroller for it to go through that webservice.
      • 2011-12-05 33921, 2011

      • warp
        (edit already sort of works, even in that front-end, but there's no validation there yet)
      • 2011-12-05 33924, 2011

      • warp
        ruaok: done.
      • 2011-12-05 33943, 2011

      • ruaok
        I'm excited to the see the WS work. :)
      • 2011-12-05 33946, 2011

      • ruaok
        ocharles: you?
      • 2011-12-05 33958, 2011

      • reosarevok
        So are we users! (if only to have bots that avoid the RE :P )
      • 2011-12-05 33916, 2011

      • ocharles
        not much to talk about from me either -- Last.FM stuff is really picking up, so my time there was good (not sure what I can talk about so i'll stay hush for now)
      • 2011-12-05 33934, 2011

      • ocharles
        as for my musicbrainz time - monday was the relationship editor, and thursday/friday was just JIRA type stuff
      • 2011-12-05 33904, 2011

      • ocharles
        (see code review and JIRA for details, but I can't think of anything noticable to really talk about)
      • 2011-12-05 33931, 2011

      • ruaok
        is the meb site fully done?
      • 2011-12-05 33936, 2011

      • ocharles
        i believe so
      • 2011-12-05 33943, 2011

      • ocharles
        we should have a test together on that end
      • 2011-12-05 33944, 2011

      • ruaok
        ipns and so?
      • 2011-12-05 33949, 2011

      • ocharles
        yep
      • 2011-12-05 33902, 2011

      • ruaok
        ok. lets see if we can do late later this week.
      • 2011-12-05 33905, 2011

      • ocharles
        we need to have a run down and make sure we've got everything
      • 2011-12-05 33910, 2011

      • ruaok
        yep.
      • 2011-12-05 33932, 2011

      • ruaok
        are you using the live database as the backend or do you have a DB on dexter?
      • 2011-12-05 33944, 2011

      • ocharles
        a DB on dexter, iirc
      • 2011-12-05 33900, 2011

      • ruaok
        ok, I'll expose it via our gateway and take a look.
      • 2011-12-05 33902, 2011

      • ruaok
        thanks!
      • 2011-12-05 33906, 2011

      • ruaok
        ok, who else for review?
      • 2011-12-05 33909, 2011

      • ocharles
        oh, i think I need to review navaps patch too
      • 2011-12-05 33911, 2011

      • ocharles notes that
      • 2011-12-05 33920, 2011

      • ruaok
        ijabz, nikki, reosarevok?
      • 2011-12-05 33934, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Not a lot of stuff this week
      • 2011-12-05 33940, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Well, people have gone bot-crazy
      • 2011-12-05 33943, 2011

      • reosarevok
        I guess you've seen that
      • 2011-12-05 33949, 2011

      • ijabz
        nothing this week
      • 2011-12-05 33956, 2011

      • nikki
        reosarevok and I have been closing trac tickets
      • 2011-12-05 33902, 2011

      • reosarevok
        So we now have bots to add every type of discogs links + wiki ones
      • 2011-12-05 33903, 2011

      • ruaok
        ijabz: we have a search release to do, right?
      • 2011-12-05 33907, 2011

      • nikki
        there are now just 29 server ones left :P
      • 2011-12-05 33909, 2011

      • reosarevok
        And yeah, closing trac tickets
      • 2011-12-05 33914, 2011

      • ruaok
        nikki: nice!
      • 2011-12-05 33915, 2011

      • ijabz
        Yay,
      • 2011-12-05 33924, 2011

      • ocharles
        wow, awesome work
      • 2011-12-05 33932, 2011

      • nikki
        (still got picard to do though...)
      • 2011-12-05 33933, 2011

      • ruaok
        nikki: is there anything I need to do one the trac front?
      • 2011-12-05 33950, 2011

      • reosarevok
        I'd say the ones left for server can be discarded
      • 2011-12-05 33902, 2011

      • reosarevok
        You might want to look at them and confirm? Dunno
      • 2011-12-05 33909, 2011

      • ocharles
        if it's only 29 I can spend time looking at them
      • 2011-12-05 33913, 2011

      • ruaok says nuke em
      • 2011-12-05 33917, 2011

      • reosarevok
        No, ocharles, not you
      • 2011-12-05 33918, 2011

      • reosarevok
        :p
      • 2011-12-05 33930, 2011

      • reosarevok
        (there's one of yours there that we both hated the idea of ;p)
      • 2011-12-05 33933, 2011

      • ruaok
        ocharles: did you get a chance to estimate the schema change tickets?
      • 2011-12-05 33944, 2011

      • ruaok
        I failed to give you a roll-up ticket before I left. :-(
      • 2011-12-05 33951, 2011

      • ocharles
        ruaok: chance yes, did I do it, no :( task management fail
      • 2011-12-05 33903, 2011

      • ruaok
        lol.
      • 2011-12-05 33911, 2011

      • ruaok
        do you still want a roll-up ticket?
      • 2011-12-05 33911, 2011

      • ocharles
        I completely forgot about that, I'll add an item to do that now too
      • 2011-12-05 33911, 2011

      • warp
        haha
      • 2011-12-05 33925, 2011

      • ruaok
        complete it this week, please.
      • 2011-12-05 33932, 2011

      • ocharles
        ruaok: what's a roll-up ticket?
      • 2011-12-05 33938, 2011

      • ocharles
        is that one that fits in my backpack?
      • 2011-12-05 33945, 2011

      • ruaok
        In the next days I'm going to commit us to Jan 15th or so. which we should be able to do, right?
      • 2011-12-05 33906, 2011

      • ocharles
        I don't think I need any extra ticket, assuming everything is in the correct milestone
      • 2011-12-05 33907, 2011

      • ruaok
        a roll-up ticket would task you with estimating all its dependent schema change tickets
      • 2011-12-05 33919, 2011

      • ruaok
        I'll double check that that is the case.
      • 2011-12-05 33923, 2011

      • ocharles
        nah, sounds like the milestone will cover that
      • 2011-12-05 33925, 2011

      • ruaok
        assume that by the time thu rolls around.
      • 2011-12-05 33928, 2011

      • ruaok
        ok.
      • 2011-12-05 33932, 2011

      • ocharles
        will do
      • 2011-12-05 33941, 2011

      • ruaok
        ping me when you're done so I can post a schedule with confidence.
      • 2011-12-05 33917, 2011

      • ruaok
        anything, anyone else for review?
      • 2011-12-05 33932, 2011

      • ruaok
        any pressing things I need to look at? (besides lyrics site)
      • 2011-12-05 33939, 2011

      • ocharles
        I have a few other bits on bookbrainz and scheduling if that's interesting?
      • 2011-12-05 33956, 2011

      • ocharles
        happy to skip them though, they aren't necessary for this meeting
      • 2011-12-05 33908, 2011

      • ijabz
        I have a comment about scheduling
      • 2011-12-05 33917, 2011

      • ruaok
        ocharles: lets leave them for now.
      • 2011-12-05 33923, 2011

      • ruaok
        if we have time, we will go it at the end
      • 2011-12-05 33925, 2011

      • ruaok
        ijabz: shoot
      • 2011-12-05 33908, 2011

      • ijabz
        jura has a voting system for issues, I don't see the point of the new scheduling system
      • 2011-12-05 33922, 2011

      • ocharles
        they solve different problems
      • 2011-12-05 33938, 2011

      • ocharles
        JIRA voting tells us how many people want something fixed, but scheduling.ocharles.org.uk tells us when people want something fixed by
      • 2011-12-05 33940, 2011

      • ruaok
        not everyone cares about every ticket.
      • 2011-12-05 33947, 2011

      • ocharles
        the latter has also had considerably more input
      • 2011-12-05 33954, 2011

      • ruaok nods
      • 2011-12-05 33910, 2011

      • ijabz
        But none of the ones I was interested in came up in the scheduling game
      • 2011-12-05 33911, 2011

      • ruaok
        I gotta say that was a nice insight and mighty swift execution on your part ocharles
      • 2011-12-05 33928, 2011

      • ocharles
        ta :)
      • 2011-12-05 33932, 2011

      • warp nods.
      • 2011-12-05 33942, 2011

      • reosarevok
        ijabz, the scheduling game only showed Post-NGS and NGS+1 now
      • 2011-12-05 33948, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Because we wanted to empty those categories
      • 2011-12-05 33956, 2011

      • ijabz
        Maybe its just me then
      • 2011-12-05 33907, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Now that we have enough votes for those, we might be able to empty them and put all the rest in
      • 2011-12-05 33911, 2011

      • reosarevok thinks that's the point
      • 2011-12-05 33928, 2011

      • ocharles
        ijabz: it's mostly extrapolating the system I was trying to use in IRC with nikki and reosarevok, but to be more inclusive, and require less coordination
      • 2011-12-05 33937, 2011

      • ocharles
        reosarevok: that's the goal for now, yea
      • 2011-12-05 33953, 2011

      • ruaok
        ocharles: where does the output of the voting game go?
      • 2011-12-05 33901, 2011

      • ocharles
      • 2011-12-05 33905, 2011

      • ruaok
        ah
      • 2011-12-05 33936, 2011

      • ruaok wonders what the sort order is.
      • 2011-12-05 33941, 2011

      • ocharles
        total vote count
      • 2011-12-05 33954, 2011

      • ruaok
        k.
      • 2011-12-05 33907, 2011

      • warp
        warp has changed the topic to: agenda: BBC (artist hijacking, merges) | incapability to do a hot-fix release fixing important regressions | MBS-3856 (ocharles) | cover art archive (types, etc..) | MBS-2096 (ocharles)
      • 2011-12-05 33909, 2011

      • ruaok
        maybe it needs the total vote count column to make it more clear.
      • 2011-12-05 33918, 2011

      • ocharles nods
      • 2011-12-05 33920, 2011

      • ruaok
        well, onto BBC stuffs.
      • 2011-12-05 33929, 2011

      • ruaok
        who was that?
      • 2011-12-05 33929, 2011

      • reosarevok
        That'd be me
      • 2011-12-05 33930, 2011

      • warp
        reosarevok:
      • 2011-12-05 33951, 2011

      • reosarevok
        The BBC is not being careful enough about assigning their plays to MB artists
      • 2011-12-05 33905, 2011

      • reosarevok
        So artists are coming to MB and trying to hijack other artists' MBIDs
      • 2011-12-05 33911, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Because BBC says they're them!
      • 2011-12-05 33920, 2011

      • ruaok
        oh jeez.
      • 2011-12-05 33921, 2011

      • reosarevok has seen 3 of those in a week and a half
      • 2011-12-05 33926, 2011

      • reosarevok
        Still a small amount
      • 2011-12-05 33934, 2011

      • ruaok
        a problem nonetheless.
      • 2011-12-05 33935, 2011

      • reosarevok
        But I only saw the ones who were *removing* info
      • 2011-12-05 33942, 2011

      • reosarevok
        (as that's what I vote on)