guys... if an artist has more then one youtube link, there's any manner to get the most important?
2012-01-17 01727, 2012
reosarevok
FilipeTriworks, what would be "the most important"
2012-01-17 01728, 2012
reosarevok
?
2012-01-17 01757, 2012
reosarevok
It is kinda strange for an artist to have two official channels, but I guess you have an example :)
2012-01-17 01708, 2012
FilipeTriworks
the official one, most seen, which have more videos
2012-01-17 01720, 2012
FilipeTriworks
alicia keys 3 youtube channels
2012-01-17 01723, 2012
reosarevok looks
2012-01-17 01731, 2012
FilipeTriworks
*have 3*
2012-01-17 01752, 2012
reosarevok
heh
2012-01-17 01756, 2012
reosarevok
All 3 are official
2012-01-17 01700, 2012
reosarevok
Indeed
2012-01-17 01725, 2012
FilipeTriworks
right but 2 of them are feeded by labels
2012-01-17 01744, 2012
FilipeTriworks
the first one is personal
2012-01-17 01747, 2012
nikki
we don't have a way to make a distinction :/
2012-01-17 01751, 2012
reosarevok
I guess the clear options are to either query YouTube for the number of videos, or show them all
2012-01-17 01704, 2012
reosarevok
The distinction is rare enough for nobody to have wondered about it before
2012-01-17 01731, 2012
reosarevok
Because the "personal" filter doesn't really cut it either...
2012-01-17 01723, 2012
reosarevok
(DOGOTVOFFICIAL and DOGOUNCENSORED are two channels from the same Italian band, the latter showing a video that the label refused to have in the main one)
2012-01-17 01731, 2012
reosarevok
(you'd ideally be able to show both)
2012-01-17 01748, 2012
reosarevok
(as the video in the latter is not in the other at all)
2012-01-17 01728, 2012
FilipeTriworks
wi thought that all links could have some kind of weight associated
2012-01-17 01739, 2012
FilipeTriworks
*I*
2012-01-17 01703, 2012
FilipeTriworks
thank you all once again
2012-01-17 01751, 2012
reosarevok
FilipeTriworks, that sounds like something you should do in-house
2012-01-17 01700, 2012
reosarevok
(I can see the point though :) )
2012-01-17 01733, 2012
reosarevok
(but it'd need a kind of automation we don't really use anywhere at the moment AFAIK)
this is my draft of a CAA specification - it might work well to work from a repository for the spec as we can use GitHub issues to highlight problems in the spec, and branch it to make ammendments and do reviews on pull requests
2012-01-17 01735, 2012
ocharles
ijabz you too!
2012-01-17 01756, 2012
voiceinsideyou1 joined the channel
2012-01-17 01742, 2012
warp
ocharles: sounds like a good idea, I'll have a look soon.
if people like the sound of this process (not my specification), I will start adding what I see as open issues
2012-01-17 01712, 2012
ocharles
stuff that's either not covered, or is too vague
2012-01-17 01736, 2012
ocharles
and I'll also post to the devel mailing list
2012-01-17 01711, 2012
ocharles
but now, it's meeting time
2012-01-17 01735, 2012
reosarevok
ocharles: "If the edit is accepted, the Cover Art Archive does not change." should be rejected I guess
2012-01-17 01737, 2012
reosarevok
(last sentence)
2012-01-17 01743, 2012
reosarevok goes shopping
2012-01-17 01720, 2012
nikki
ocharles: so front doesn't have a filetype?
2012-01-17 01726, 2012
Swarup
hi <ocharles> when u get a chance ..get u look at this error that i got on my other VM host while install patch..sudo cpanm --installdeps . https://gist.github.com/1627561
2012-01-17 01712, 2012
nikki
ocharles: it doesn't seem to say how to get the smaller versions of files
2012-01-17 01749, 2012
murdos
ocharles: sounds like a perfect process!
2012-01-17 01747, 2012
ijabz
ocharles you'll pleased to know I bought 'Pragmatic Guide to Hit' a few weeks ago
2012-01-17 01754, 2012
ijabz
Git
2012-01-17 01707, 2012
ijabz
Though having read it my view is that whilst indeed Git is powerful, and I can see it being very useful on a project such as the Linux Kernel it seems it can all too easily be abused to create overly complicated scenarios
2012-01-17 01719, 2012
ijabz
But on that note, teatime
2012-01-17 01724, 2012
bitmap joined the channel
2012-01-17 01725, 2012
Swarup
anyone know how i can resolve this issue...Building and testing Encode-Detect-1.01 ... Building Encode-Detect cc -Isrc -I/usr/lib/perl/5.10/CORE -fPIC -x c++ -Iinclude -c -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -DDEBIAN -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -fstack-protector -I/usr/local/include -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -O2 -g -o src/nsEscCharsetProber.o src/nsEscCharsetProber.cpp cc: error trying to exec 'cc1plus': execvp: No su
2012-01-17 01752, 2012
warp
ocharles: aw, no OPTIONS support in CAA? :)
2012-01-17 01759, 2012
ocharles joined the channel
2012-01-17 01724, 2012
ocharles
warp: yes, I plan to open an issue about that
2012-01-17 01730, 2012
ocharles
but as I said, I wanted comments on the process, not the spec :)
2012-01-17 01737, 2012
ocharles
ijabz: oh, cool :)
2012-01-17 01706, 2012
ocharles
Swarup: you shouldn't need Encode::Detect
2012-01-17 01729, 2012
Swarup
ok..should i let it skip and continue.. with --prompt option
2012-01-17 01741, 2012
warp
ocharles: where should comments on the spec go? github issues?
yay, just been made maintainer of Web.MusicBrainz, Haskell bindings to /ws/2
2012-01-17 01744, 2012
reosarevok
lol
2012-01-17 01758, 2012
reosarevok
Didn't have enough with two jobs and a side project?
2012-01-17 01702, 2012
ruaok
spoke up too loudly, did we?
2012-01-17 01757, 2012
ocharles
reosarevok: BookBrainz continues to be blocked until I can figure out a way to bracket QuickCheck, or until i give up trying. and I'll be damned if I give up!
2012-01-17 01717, 2012
ocharles
(but I'll probably give up if I can't figure it out soon)
2012-01-17 01748, 2012
navap
Can someone point me in the right direction? I want to merge two hashes that have significant duplicated keys, but I want the values merged together by adding the two values together.
2012-01-17 01700, 2012
navap
Everything I find online deals with merging and keeping one of the two values
2012-01-17 01746, 2012
ocharles
navap: there is no way to do that without being explicit
2012-01-17 01752, 2012
ocharles
do you want every key added up?
2012-01-17 01718, 2012
ocharles
$a{$_} += $b{$_} for keys %b; # might work for that
2012-01-17 01701, 2012
navap
I think I want something like $new{$_} = $a{$_} + $b{$_}
2012-01-17 01732, 2012
navap
But I also want to copy over any keys that are unique to %a or %b
2012-01-17 01745, 2012
navap
Does that make sense?
2012-01-17 01749, 2012
navap
This is for my webalizer parser. I've got a hash built for each month's stats and I want to now add everything up and create a hash for each year.
