I mean, I agree with it if it's to change comments, not for other edits
2012-06-11 16336, 2012
reosarevok
Maybe to batch-set artist
2012-06-11 16342, 2012
reosarevok
But it's a bit trickier, that one
2012-06-11 16348, 2012
ocharles
I agree with all the scheduling, but I disagree with 3860 and 3991
2012-06-11 16353, 2012
ocharles
(entirely)
2012-06-11 16300, 2012
ocharles
so I'd vote those to be unscheduled
2012-06-11 16327, 2012
ruaok
me is dubious about 3860
2012-06-11 16330, 2012
ruaok
+/
2012-06-11 16338, 2012
nikkimini
you should do what you tell everyone else to do then, and comment on the ticket about why you think it should be a wontfix :P
2012-06-11 16341, 2012
reosarevok
ocharles: 3991 is *exactly* what was asked by style when addding this
2012-06-11 16346, 2012
reosarevok
(this attributed)
2012-06-11 16348, 2012
reosarevok
*-d
2012-06-11 16353, 2012
ocharles
nikkimini: I am fine with doing that, but I also tell people to vote unscheduled :)
2012-06-11 16302, 2012
reosarevok
So I'll need a better reason than "disagree"
2012-06-11 16306, 2012
ocharles
reosarevok: if that overrules my vote, that is fine
2012-06-11 16312, 2012
ijabz joined the channel
2012-06-11 16321, 2012
reosarevok
Well, maybe there's a good reason we shouldn't do it
2012-06-11 16323, 2012
ruaok
objections to individual tickets notwithstanding, we're ok to move the whole section though?
2012-06-11 16332, 2012
ocharles
yes, i seem to be overruled on both my votes :)
2012-06-11 16348, 2012
ruaok
any objections to the whole section being accepted?
2012-06-11 16301, 2012
ruaok
motion carried, section accepted.
2012-06-11 16302, 2012
ruaok
onward.
2012-06-11 16305, 2012
warp does not object.
2012-06-11 16358, 2012
ocharles
reosarevok: would you like me to drive?
2012-06-11 16302, 2012
reosarevok
Please
2012-06-11 16306, 2012
ocharles
ok
2012-06-11 16310, 2012
reosarevok
two goals in 4 min, have to watch this :D
2012-06-11 16317, 2012
ocharles
[MBS-1969] No indication of an action after selecting the first release for merging 5 5 8
2012-06-11 16333, 2012
ruaok
oh, damn euro cup.
2012-06-11 16335, 2012
ocharles
12/Unsched
2012-06-11 16338, 2012
nikkimini
12 for me
2012-06-11 16340, 2012
ruaok
cant walk into a pub without it on the tele
2012-06-11 16346, 2012
reosarevok
I still don't see a big issue, but a banner "Has been added to the merge queue" for 12 sounds reasonable
2012-06-11 16350, 2012
ruaok
fine
2012-06-11 16305, 2012
nikkimini
or you could just have id="merge" at the bottom and link to #merge
2012-06-11 16318, 2012
nikkimini
instead of a banner telling you about the other banner :P
2012-06-11 16334, 2012
kepstin-work
or move the merge box to the top of the page
2012-06-11 16343, 2012
reosarevok
kepstin-work: no way
2012-06-11 16348, 2012
ocharles
lets talk about dates please
2012-06-11 16351, 2012
ocharles
not implementations
2012-06-11 16352, 2012
reosarevok
12
2012-06-11 16309, 2012
ocharles
12 it is
2012-06-11 16319, 2012
ocharles
[MBS-2087] Release editor > Move comment beside title rather than beside annotation 5 8 5
2012-06-11 16328, 2012
nikkimini
ugh, we had that one before
2012-06-11 16334, 2012
reosarevok abstains
2012-06-11 16337, 2012
nikkimini abstains too
2012-06-11 16344, 2012
ocharles
unsched
2012-06-11 16345, 2012
reosarevok
not sure I agree, but not sure I disagree either
2012-06-11 16307, 2012
ruaok
based on this feedback, just close it. :)
2012-06-11 16324, 2012
reosarevok
ruaok: well, 13 people seem to agree
2012-06-11 16324, 2012
ruaok
or toss into unsched and move on
2012-06-11 16338, 2012
ruaok
unsched, move on
2012-06-11 16342, 2012
ocharles
warp has an important discovery to share
2012-06-11 16345, 2012
warp
"his did not reach a decision in the scheduling game and it was considered to be closed as wont fix. If anyone feels strongly, please speak up now. Otherwise, we will close as wont fix in the next round of scheduling."
2012-06-11 16351, 2012
ocharles
:)
2012-06-11 16351, 2012
warp
so, I'm going to close this one now.
2012-06-11 16353, 2012
ocharles
+1
2012-06-11 16310, 2012
ruaok
+1
2012-06-11 16311, 2012
reosarevok
huh, fine then
2012-06-11 16311, 2012
ocharles
[MBS-3780] Warn or don't allow links to amazon ASIN if barcode doesn't match 4 5 6
2012-06-11 16328, 2012
nikkimini
unsched for me
2012-06-11 16330, 2012
ocharles
Unsched
2012-06-11 16334, 2012
ruaok
ok
2012-06-11 16338, 2012
reosarevok
I was going to say 12
2012-06-11 16340, 2012
nikkimini
I wouldn't mind a report if we collected the necessary data
2012-06-11 16341, 2012
reosarevok
Why unsched?
2012-06-11 16341, 2012
demosdemon suggests Dagon as a server name
2012-06-11 16343, 2012
ocharles
Would rather a report or something that can be done outside the server's web frontend
