#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • nikki
        that's all I know
      • 2012-08-18 23104, 2012

      • reosarevok
        But did he get to implement releases etc?
      • 2012-08-18 23111, 2012

      • nikki
        try it?
      • 2012-08-18 23122, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Ok
      • 2012-08-18 23145, 2012

      • ocharles
        hmmm, i was going to suggest ruaok use pgq rather than timestamps for this, and then maybe mirror that into a table/log file
      • 2012-08-18 23102, 2012

      • ocharles
        then you get deletes too
      • 2012-08-18 23109, 2012

      • warp
        goodmorning mr. charles!
      • 2012-08-18 23159, 2012

      • thereisnospoon joined the channel
      • 2012-08-18 23110, 2012

      • thereisnospoon
        getting the same error as http://lists.musicbrainz.org/pipermail/musicbrain… when installing on debian, any hints or any info ya's need to help me out here?
      • 2012-08-18 23107, 2012

      • warp
        thereisnospoon: it cannot find Catalyst, presumably something went wrong when installing the depedancies
      • 2012-08-18 23139, 2012

      • warp
        thereisnospoon: run "carton install" again in the musicbrainz-server directory, see if that fixes it.
      • 2012-08-18 23100, 2012

      • thereisnospoon
        ok, runnin again now, just carton install, not with --deployment?
      • 2012-08-18 23108, 2012

      • warp
        if it doesn't, check if you see any error messages when running "carton install" which is causing some modules to not get installed properly.
      • 2012-08-18 23151, 2012

      • warp
        thereisnospoon: I usually just run "carton install" without --deployment, but either should work. it's still not clear to me how --deployment differs :)
      • 2012-08-18 23151, 2012

      • thereisnospoon
        kk, waiting for it to do its thing now
      • 2012-08-18 23139, 2012

      • thereisnospoon
        ok that did the trick it appears, its loading now, now any hints on how to change the port?
      • 2012-08-18 23145, 2012

      • thereisnospoon
        nvm, found it, thanks for that
      • 2012-08-18 23133, 2012

      • ocharles sets up in his camping chair on the balcony
      • 2012-08-18 23153, 2012

      • reosarevok
        lol
      • 2012-08-18 23105, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Do you have one of those mythical non-cloudy days?
      • 2012-08-18 23132, 2012

      • ocharles
        it's gorgeous here today
      • 2012-08-18 23110, 2012

      • reosarevok
        So, what are you hacking on? :)
      • 2012-08-18 23134, 2012

      • ocharles
        improving the front page to show off the latest releases that have front cover art
      • 2012-08-18 23111, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Sweet :)
      • 2012-08-18 23118, 2012

      • nikki
        I like how we're doing that before we even show the latest releases at all :P
      • 2012-08-18 23101, 2012

      • reosarevok
        nikki: I assumed it'd be because the new releases are more likely to change quite fast than the releases with new fronts are
      • 2012-08-18 23148, 2012

      • reosarevok
        ocharles: dunno if you read it - we were talking yesterday of some "look at all that editing" twitter account
      • 2012-08-18 23113, 2012

      • ocharles
        is that a bit like my real time events stuff?
      • 2012-08-18 23121, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Probably
      • 2012-08-18 23157, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I think they wanted mostly to show off, like "look, changes all the time! so many!" :p
      • 2012-08-18 23121, 2012

      • ocharles
        yep, that's sort of what this is about
      • 2012-08-18 23125, 2012

      • ocharles
        this will say 'added x minutes ago'
      • 2012-08-18 23102, 2012

      • nikki
        won't people confuse that with the date the release was added?
      • 2012-08-18 23118, 2012

      • ocharles
        you mean the date the release was release?
      • 2012-08-18 23122, 2012

      • ocharles
        released*
      • 2012-08-18 23122, 2012

      • nikki
        no
      • 2012-08-18 23128, 2012

      • ocharles
        it shows the date the release was added
      • 2012-08-18 23134, 2012

      • nikki
        oh
      • 2012-08-18 23140, 2012

      • nikki
        I thought it was supposed to be when the cover was added
      • 2012-08-18 23150, 2012

      • ocharles
        ah, no
      • 2012-08-18 23158, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Hmm, that sounds strange
      • 2012-08-18 23122, 2012

      • reosarevok
        So you show them once they get cover art, but you order them by how long ago they were added in general?
      • 2012-08-18 23134, 2012

      • ocharles
        yes, the cover art is just because it will be too plain to show things without cover art
      • 2012-08-18 23159, 2012

      • reosarevok
        So, let me get this straight
      • 2012-08-18 23113, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Are you checking the latest releases added, and showing the ones that have cover art?
      • 2012-08-18 23124, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Or are you checking the latest releases cover art was added to and showing them?
      • 2012-08-18 23132, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (also, CAA or also Amazon?)
      • 2012-08-18 23147, 2012

      • ocharles
        just CAA
      • 2012-08-18 23157, 2012

      • ocharles
        the latest releases added that have front cover art is what i'm showing
      • 2012-08-18 23100, 2012

      • ocharles
        ordered by date added
      • 2012-08-18 23134, 2012

      • nikki
        we know the cover art url though, so there's no reason we'd need to exclude amazon ones
      • 2012-08-18 23149, 2012

      • ocharles
        this is about showing our own data off for now
      • 2012-08-18 23158, 2012

      • ocharles
        it's just a prototype, let me prototype :)
      • 2012-08-18 23111, 2012

      • nikki
        no! you should do everything my way! :P
      • 2012-08-18 23102, 2012

      • nikki
        I'm hungry but it's too hot to feel like eating anything :(
      • 2012-08-18 23120, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Cold potato salad!
      • 2012-08-18 23123, 2012

      • nikki
        ew
      • 2012-08-18 23102, 2012

      • ocharles
        noms
      • 2012-08-18 23105, 2012

      • warp
        Hm. I think I'm done with all the code changes required.
      • 2012-08-18 23122, 2012

      • warp
        now I just need to write a single static json file
      • 2012-08-18 23129, 2012

      • reosarevok
        warp: what was your project? :)
      • 2012-08-18 23141, 2012

      • warp
        reosarevok: json-ld support
      • 2012-08-18 23159, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Explained for idiots, what does that allow? :)
      • 2012-08-18 23126, 2012

      • nikki
        can we make caa info replicated with the next schema change?
      • 2012-08-18 23140, 2012

      • warp
        it makes a few tweaks to the json output so it can be read/parsed as RDF. which is useful for anyone working with RDF or other linked data.
      • 2012-08-18 23141, 2012

      • nikki is getting ahead of herself, given that it's not even being dumped yet, but... :P
      • 2012-08-18 23135, 2012

      • ocharles
        nikki: I'd be in favour of that
      • 2012-08-18 23139, 2012

      • ocharles
        dumps should come out on monday
      • 2012-08-18 23157, 2012

      • ocharles
        or whenever the next dump after monday is
      • 2012-08-18 23105, 2012

      • nikki
        rob gave me one today
      • 2012-08-18 23112, 2012

      • nikki
        but I already want to update it :P
      • 2012-08-18 23133, 2012

      • ocharles
        stupid edit table, why are you so big
      • 2012-08-18 23115, 2012

      • reosarevok
        ocharles: hmm, seems we only get an average of 10 new releases per hour
      • 2012-08-18 23128, 2012

      • reosarevok
        So if we don't show also the ones with Amazon art, it might feel a bit too... static :(
      • 2012-08-18 23121, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (either that or the last 24 hours have been slow)
      • 2012-08-18 23136, 2012

      • Leftmost joined the channel
      • 2012-08-18 23105, 2012

      • alastairp_ joined the channel
      • 2012-08-18 23102, 2012

      • ocharles
        booo, this laptop is not setup for development
      • 2012-08-18 23110, 2012

      • ocharles twiddles thumbs while carton install runs
      • 2012-08-18 23126, 2012

      • pthulin joined the channel
      • 2012-08-18 23100, 2012

      • kallux joined the channel
      • 2012-08-18 23151, 2012

      • alastairp_ joined the channel
      • 2012-08-18 23148, 2012

      • ocharles
        hmm, our carton does seem to be completely borked
      • 2012-08-18 23154, 2012

      • ocharles
        i'm getting that ExtUtils thing too, and I can't fix it
      • 2012-08-18 23108, 2012

      • ocharles
        ok, you have to manually install the latest version of MakeMaker
      • 2012-08-18 23155, 2012

      • nikki joined the channel
      • 2012-08-18 23102, 2012

      • ehrgeiz joined the channel
      • 2012-08-18 23149, 2012

      • ocharles
      • 2012-08-18 23123, 2012

      • reosarevok
        ocharles, editor's ?
      • 2012-08-18 23125, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Really? :D
      • 2012-08-18 23132, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (but, nice!)
      • 2012-08-18 23118, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (I like that quite a lot :) )
      • 2012-08-18 23100, 2012

      • ocharles
        oops
      • 2012-08-18 23125, 2012

      • ocharles
        what do you think about crediting the editor? shall I do that too?
      • 2012-08-18 23134, 2012

      • ocharles
        "added by reosarevok"
      • 2012-08-18 23138, 2012

      • ocharles
        etc
      • 2012-08-18 23139, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Unsure
      • 2012-08-18 23149, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Both work I guess
      • 2012-08-18 23102, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I kinda like it now, though
      • 2012-08-18 23121, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Looks more like "the community did that" than "some specific guy did that"
      • 2012-08-18 23137, 2012

      • ocharles
        true
      • 2012-08-18 23142, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (which makes sense since someone can have added it + someone else fixed it + someone else added art)
      • 2012-08-18 23135, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Of course that's just my opinion and other people might disagree
      • 2012-08-18 23143, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Not my fault they're wrong :D
      • 2012-08-18 23154, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I meeaaan, and they might be right :)
      • 2012-08-18 23135, 2012

      • ocharles
        what other data can we show off on the homepage?
      • 2012-08-18 23104, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Can? Lots. Should? not sure
      • 2012-08-18 23111, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I think this is enough for the homepage
      • 2012-08-18 23128, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (and any other data-feed-thingies should be in a dashboard or something)
      • 2012-08-18 23131, 2012

      • ocharles
        cool, then my hack is done and I can go and drink beer? :)
      • 2012-08-18 23154, 2012

      • reosarevok
        While you think about the second hack? Sure :p
      • 2012-08-18 23145, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Is there a limit to it? As in, will it always show the last 4, or does it change depending on how many recent releases with art are there?
      • 2012-08-18 23159, 2012

      • ocharles
        it will only show 4
      • 2012-08-18 23127, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Ok
      • 2012-08-18 23142, 2012

      • reosarevok updates the page
      • 2012-08-18 23150, 2012

      • ocharles
        which page?
      • 2012-08-18 23108, 2012

      • reosarevok
      • 2012-08-18 23112, 2012

      • ocharles
        ah, thanks!
      • 2012-08-18 23134, 2012

      • reosarevok
        :)
      • 2012-08-18 23138, 2012

      • ocharles
        i might work on the event feed later
      • 2012-08-18 23140, 2012

      • ocharles nods
      • 2012-08-18 23143, 2012

      • ocharles
        i'll let you finish editing
      • 2012-08-18 23148, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Yeah, I just moved it up
      • 2012-08-18 23152, 2012

      • reosarevok
        To "in progress"
      • 2012-08-18 23156, 2012

      • reosarevok
        You do the rest
      • 2012-08-18 23159, 2012

      • nikki
        the cover is rather large next to the text imo (or vice versa, it just seems out of balance)
      • 2012-08-18 23101, 2012

      • reosarevok goes fix more classical...
      • 2012-08-18 23121, 2012

      • ocharles
        ianad
      • 2012-08-18 23130, 2012

      • nikki
        and something like that totally looks like it should have a way of scrolling left/right to show more :P
      • 2012-08-18 23152, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I thought that was kind of intentional, to show off the cover over the rest - but a couple more sizes couldn't hurt I guess
      • 2012-08-18 23139, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (I guess clicking the cover takes you to the release page - or does it open the lightbox?)
      • 2012-08-18 23151, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (if the latter, it should probably be the former :) )
      • 2012-08-18 23135, 2012

      • ocharles
        it opens the lightbox
      • 2012-08-18 23141, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Oh, also, a small thing, ocharles: does it make sure they're thumbnailed?
      • 2012-08-18 23147, 2012

      • ocharles
        because that's consistent with what cover art does atm
      • 2012-08-18 23151, 2012

      • reosarevok
        (we don't want people loading 4x10mb when loading the main site)
      • 2012-08-18 23156, 2012

      • ocharles
        i don't know what you mean, it uses the thumbnail where it can, yes
      • 2012-08-18 23120, 2012

      • reosarevok
        I mean that it would make sense to avoid any that have no thumbnails
      • 2012-08-18 23138, 2012

      • reosarevok
        Dunno if that's simple though
      • 2012-08-18 23141, 2012

      • ocharles
        can't do that
      • 2012-08-18 23155, 2012

      • ocharles
        all i can do is be optimistic that the thumbnailer is doing its job
      • 2012-08-18 23121, 2012

      • reosarevok
        heh. Well, if it's fast enough, it's unlikely for more than one of the four to be a full image I guess
      • 2012-08-18 23153, 2012

      • reosarevok
        About the lightbox - yeah, but that happens when you're in a release page, and you click on a cover
      • 2012-08-18 23106, 2012

      • reosarevok
        You obviously don't want to go to the release, because, well, you are there :) )
      • 2012-08-18 23122, 2012

      • reosarevok
        In this case I'd expect people to want to go to the release if they click them
      • 2012-08-18 23129, 2012

      • reosarevok
        But let's get more opinions!
      • 2012-08-18 23137, 2012

      • reosarevok
        People, opinions please! :)
      • 2012-08-18 23151, 2012

      • nikki
        maniadb shows a lightbox if you click on a cover and I keep clicking it trying to go to the release page and it's really annoying
      • 2012-08-18 23112, 2012

      • nikki
        especially since their lightbox covers the link to the page, so you have to close it before you can click on the right thing >(
      • 2012-08-18 23147, 2012

      • nikki
        so basically I agree with reosarevok :P