reosarevok: yeah, I could - but is it really useful to interested users?
2012-11-05 31035, 2012
alastairp
I thought it was mostly developer powow?
2012-11-05 31051, 2012
reosarevok
Well, it's a music technology group after all
2012-11-05 31002, 2012
reosarevok
Aren't people into digital music stuff?
2012-11-05 31033, 2012
warp
it's mostly useful for anyknow who knows musicbrainz. if you're not familiar with musicbrainz it will considerably less useful.
2012-11-05 31026, 2012
warp
still, if you're into any kind of music metadata / ontology / etc... you should be familiar with musicbrainz! :)
2012-11-05 31038, 2012
alastairp
right
2012-11-05 31055, 2012
warp
alastairp: certainly not just developers
2012-11-05 31037, 2012
alastairp
e.g., first item on the agenda is "Moving MB to cloud hosting". Not really ontology related :)
2012-11-05 31037, 2012
warp
alastairp: that agenda doesn't look final :)
2012-11-05 31003, 2012
nikki
alastairp: we apparently have a few rooms, so we can split up
2012-11-05 31016, 2012
nikki
so just because some people are being big geeks in one room... :P
2012-11-05 31025, 2012
warp
alastairp: how should we model series and box sets? genres?
2012-11-05 31034, 2012
reosarevok
alastairp: since I myself don't care about some of those points, I'd be happy to help other peoples with more user-related concerns in room 2 :p
2012-11-05 31040, 2012
reosarevok
Guess others would too
2012-11-05 31041, 2012
reosarevok
Dunno
2012-11-05 31048, 2012
warp
alastairp: "our stuff is hard for beginners"
2012-11-05 31048, 2012
reosarevok runs to a violin concert, back later
2012-11-05 31052, 2012
alastairp
right, sounds reasonable
2012-11-05 31057, 2012
warp
etc.
2012-11-05 31005, 2012
warp
alastairp: more than enough non-developer topics on the agenda
2012-11-05 31031, 2012
CatCat
this jenkins guy sure is very spammy with his links :)
2012-11-05 31012, 2012
CatCat
ocharles> 3 months => high priority, 12 months => normal priority, unscheduled => low priority
2012-11-05 31015, 2012
CatCat
don't do that
2012-11-05 31015, 2012
nikki
that's usually good news, it means stuff's being developed :P
2012-11-05 31020, 2012
CatCat likes it the way it is
2012-11-05 31031, 2012
nikki
what's the point of having it the way it is if the way it is doesn't work?
2012-11-05 31043, 2012
CatCat
i think that, something might be high priority ,but can do to still wait a 12 months
2012-11-05 31052, 2012
nikki
that doesn't really make sense to me
2012-11-05 31052, 2012
CatCat
(for example)
2012-11-05 31012, 2012
nikki
if it can wait, it's not high priority
2012-11-05 31056, 2012
CatCat
an addiotn of a red "zomg urgent" button though, might be ok :P
2012-11-05 31010, 2012
CatCat
(only awaialbe for bug type tickets)
2012-11-05 31018, 2012
nikki
we have five priority levels anyway
2012-11-05 31021, 2012
alastairp
Freso: got it
2012-11-05 31029, 2012
Freso
\o/
2012-11-05 31059, 2012
nikki
I don't really mind the exact way the devs want it to work, as long as the people who need to know how it works know how it works and tickets that should be fixed quickly are seen and fixed quickly regardless of who enters it and other tickets are processed in some way that means they get resolved in some way in a reasonable amount of time
2012-11-05 31038, 2012
Freso
+1
2012-11-05 31032, 2012
CatCat
yes, fair point
2012-11-05 31036, 2012
nikki
and ideally we should disable any parts of jira that we're not using and that are disableable, to make it as easy to get right as possible (for example when I was putting "beta" in the summary, the affects version and the fix version because I wasn't sure which was the right place)
2012-11-05 31042, 2012
CatCat
i forget that people see things differently than me :P
2012-11-05 31010, 2012
CatCat
what i mean is "*I* thing tis high priority, but i understand that in the grand scheme of things ,this isn't important to mb as a whole"
2012-11-05 31025, 2012
nikki
that's what the scheduling stuff is for
2012-11-05 31037, 2012
CatCat
indeed, os for those i chose 12 months
2012-11-05 31056, 2012
CatCat
because i WANT it fixed within the year even though i'd LOVE to have it fixed within 3 months
2012-11-05 31024, 2012
nikki
the one thing I do like about how it works now is that features get an actual date, so we can tell if things are getting repeatedly put off. I'm not sure if the suggestion is to remove dates entirely or just to remove the buckets but keep the due dates
