I never update those pages because even if I can overcome the "why are you duplicating data? this is a waste of your time!" feeling and the "wtf are classes anyway?" feeling, those templates are horrible
Really, wiki syntax should be *simpler* than perl, right? how can it be that I understand complex MB code better than I do our templates? (as in, badly, as opposed to not at all)
2012-12-04 33906, 2012
warp
reosarevok: I am not willing.
2012-12-04 33933, 2012
reosarevok
warp: afraid that'll be the general reaction, yes
2012-12-04 33952, 2012
reosarevok
(an understandable one, too)
2012-12-04 33922, 2012
nikki
warp: can you please do something to stop all these undeliverable emails when I comment on code review?
2012-12-04 33951, 2012
nikki
whether that's changing your email stuff to stop bouncing them, contacting pronik and getting him to fix it or moving code review so we host it ourselves I don't much care.
2012-12-04 33959, 2012
nikki
wtf
2012-12-04 33908, 2012
nikki
does the webservice really not allow me to fetch my own tags?
2012-12-04 33938, 2012
nikki
I'm trying to fetch the entities I tagged with a certain thing, but I can't see any way of doing that
2012-12-04 33914, 2012
reosarevok joined the channel
2012-12-04 33946, 2012
ocharles
I don't think you can do that
2012-12-04 33936, 2012
reosarevok
huh
2012-12-04 33944, 2012
reosarevok
I always thought we were supposed to allow people to do it?
2012-12-04 33954, 2012
reosarevok
(if "that" is fetching their own tags)
2012-12-04 33957, 2012
ocharles
nikki wants to browse entities by her tags, i think
nikki: can you forward a bounce message? I'm wondering on what grounds the mail is refused.
2012-12-04 33907, 2012
warp
I thought I had SPF and such configured for frob.nl, which would cause this, but I don't.
2012-12-04 33938, 2012
robnester joined the channel
2012-12-04 33935, 2012
robnester joined the channel
2012-12-04 33951, 2012
night199uk joined the channel
2012-12-04 33958, 2012
djce joined the channel
2012-12-04 33942, 2012
MBJenkins
ollie: Creating entities is now an edit
2012-12-04 33910, 2012
ocharles
warp: there you go :)
2012-12-04 33918, 2012
luks
was switching from review board to github ever discussed?
2012-12-04 33921, 2012
warp
yay!
2012-12-04 33931, 2012
warp
luks: discussed, yes
2012-12-04 33932, 2012
ocharles
luks: yea, briefly
2012-12-04 33941, 2012
ocharles
i believe there were problems regarding getting emails sent out properly
2012-12-04 33901, 2012
ocharles
(broadcasting to all reviewers)
2012-12-04 33924, 2012
luks
ah, I remember now. github now allows anybody to subscribe to pull requests, so that's not a problem anymore
2012-12-04 33937, 2012
ocharles
i think people still want that by default though
2012-12-04 33937, 2012
luks
might be a better solution than migrating cr
2012-12-04 33942, 2012
warp
I also think the prevailing attitude was -- one step at a time, make github our main repository and only then start evaluating if reviewing code github would be suitable.
2012-12-04 33912, 2012
ocharles
that too. i hope to finish that migration this month
2012-12-04 33921, 2012
nikki wonders if github lets her select which email to send email to yet
2012-12-04 33946, 2012
ocharles
you can have multiple email addresses, but i think you elect one as primary
2012-12-04 33959, 2012
nikki
which is stupid :/
2012-12-04 33912, 2012
ocharles
i don't think it's stupid, it's quite normal
2012-12-04 33938, 2012
nikki
they say on their sign up form that they don't expose your email address, so I was rather pissed off when I clicked on "merge" and it made a commit with that email address
2012-12-04 33919, 2012
warp
nikki: "Set as default" ?
2012-12-04 33930, 2012
nikki
no idea
2012-12-04 33933, 2012
nikki
I can't remember my password
2012-12-04 33935, 2012
warp
you can also select which of your email addresses to use for notifications seperately from which one is marked as default.
2012-12-04 33950, 2012
warp
obviously I don't use any of that, so I don't know if that works as intended.