#musicbrainz-devel

/

      • ianmcorvidae
        true
      • 2013-11-04 30800, 2013

      • ocharles
        ruaok_: i will try and do that
      • 2013-11-04 30805, 2013

      • ruaok_
        ocharles: grand
      • 2013-11-04 30807, 2013

      • ocharles
        but i can't promise it will reflect reality
      • 2013-11-04 30831, 2013

      • ruaok_
        try, please
      • 2013-11-04 30832, 2013

      • ocharles
        (though I will certainly try)
      • 2013-11-04 30850, 2013

      • ocharles
        ianmcorvidae: so i'd say have a think about that, and see what feels best to you
      • 2013-11-04 30805, 2013

      • ocharles
        i'm ok with any of the options, you're doing more work than me, so I should try and fit your workflow
      • 2013-11-04 30847, 2013

      • ruaok_
        right then. done with that topic, are we?
      • 2013-11-04 30848, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I'll prod you periodically and do one or the other of the things for ensuring more hands-on testing (post-commit review, sandbox, whatever way)
      • 2013-11-04 30854, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        and yup, I'm satisfied
      • 2013-11-04 30858, 2013

      • ruaok_
        nikki: do you have some DRs for us?
      • 2013-11-04 30808, 2013

      • nikki
        I can get some
      • 2013-11-04 30811, 2013

      • nikki
        we have plenty :P
      • 2013-11-04 30823, 2013

      • ruaok_
        lets do a couple of them at least.
      • 2013-11-04 30849, 2013

      • ijabz joined the channel
      • 2013-11-04 30818, 2013

      • nikki
        http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-3700 this seems like a wontfix to me
      • 2013-11-04 30855, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        wontfix seems good to me
      • 2013-11-04 30817, 2013

      • ocharles
        +1 for all the reasons in the comments
      • 2013-11-04 30821, 2013

      • ruaok_
        yep, bad idea.
      • 2013-11-04 30822, 2013

      • ocharles
        +1 wontfix, that is
      • 2013-11-04 30838, 2013

      • reodroid
        wooontfix
      • 2013-11-04 30854, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae does that then
      • 2013-11-04 30817, 2013

      • nikki
      • 2013-11-04 30832, 2013

      • nikki
        I'm inclined towards "leave it alone" because it's easier that way :P
      • 2013-11-04 30849, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        +1 from me, it's easy enough to construct the full URL anyway
      • 2013-11-04 30856, 2013

      • ocharles
        it feels too late now
      • 2013-11-04 30858, 2013

      • ocharles
        so yea
      • 2013-11-04 30819, 2013

      • ruaok_
        agreed.
      • 2013-11-04 30835, 2013

      • fractalizator2_ joined the channel
      • 2013-11-04 30817, 2013

      • nikki
      • 2013-11-04 30829, 2013

      • fractalizator2_ joined the channel
      • 2013-11-04 30841, 2013

      • misterswag joined the channel
      • 2013-11-04 30811, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I'm not quite sure what that ticket wants
      • 2013-11-04 30822, 2013

      • nikki
        for add medium edits to be votable when adding a release
      • 2013-11-04 30836, 2013

      • ruaok_
        ianmcorvidae: "We should have a foolproof."
      • 2013-11-04 30838, 2013

      • ruaok_
        thats what
      • 2013-11-04 30847, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        heh
      • 2013-11-04 30859, 2013

      • reodroid
        didn't we do that earlier and it was a problem?
      • 2013-11-04 30804, 2013

      • nikki
        we already made them auto-edits because otherwise we ended up with releases in an inconsistent state
      • 2013-11-04 30810, 2013

      • ruaok_
        how common is this problem?
      • 2013-11-04 30820, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        we'd need a way to fail edits when other edits fail, I think, is the issue
      • 2013-11-04 30829, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        because we'd need the add release (and associated things) to fail if the add medium does
      • 2013-11-04 30832, 2013

      • nikki
        and if the release requires more work to fix than it would to just re-add it, I don't see why people can't just vote no on the release add
      • 2013-11-04 30842, 2013

      • ocharles
        right, you need to still treat the add release edit as (mostly) atomic
      • 2013-11-04 30858, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I think the better solution is to display the already-votable edits with better information (e.g. the tracklist)
      • 2013-11-04 30835, 2013

      • ocharles
        in terms of voting on this ticket, it doesn't seem feasible
      • 2013-11-04 30837, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        and otherwise, people can vote on the add release
      • 2013-11-04 30838, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        yeah
      • 2013-11-04 30830, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        so, anyway, I think we agree on wontfix?
      • 2013-11-04 30816, 2013

      • ocharles
        i think so, yea
      • 2013-11-04 30822, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I'm not sure I have an answer to ruaok_'s last question, if someone else does then I guess there's that
      • 2013-11-04 30846, 2013

      • ruaok_
        well, there is consensus on what to do. thats what matters. onward.
      • 2013-11-04 30853, 2013

      • nikki
      • 2013-11-04 30843, 2013

      • ruaok_
        in general the trend is away from XML and more towards json.
      • 2013-11-04 30855, 2013

      • ruaok_
        ijabz comment there is lessened now that we have json bindings for our WS.
      • 2013-11-04 30804, 2013

      • ruaok_
        me personally, wontfix.
      • 2013-11-04 30823, 2013

      • ocharles
        i think wontfix because we struggle to support two formats in MBS
      • 2013-11-04 30846, 2013

      • nikki
        ianmcorvidae?
      • 2013-11-04 30849, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I don't know that I particularly care, but I don't know that the implementation effort would be worth it
      • 2013-11-04 30812, 2013

      • ruaok_ nods at ianmcorvidae
      • 2013-11-04 30831, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        we do have a separate libcoverart now anyway, as I recall
      • 2013-11-04 30837, 2013

      • ruaok_
        anyone object to wonfix?
      • 2013-11-04 30842, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        so the original reason for the ticket is also a bit diluted
      • 2013-11-04 30845, 2013

      • Freso
        +1 to wontfix
      • 2013-11-04 30804, 2013

      • ruaok_
        wonfix and onward!
      • 2013-11-04 30809, 2013

      • ocharles
        \o/
      • 2013-11-04 30829, 2013

      • nikki
        http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-3411 asks for allowing some discogs links that we currently block (largely accidentally), but I've since learnt that they're some sort of purchase links and would be fine with just making sure they can be used with the purchase for download relationship
      • 2013-11-04 30835, 2013

      • ruaok_
        I'm ok with that suggestion.
      • 2013-11-04 30844, 2013

      • ocharles
        sounds sensible
      • 2013-11-04 30848, 2013

      • rvedotrc joined the channel
      • 2013-11-04 30850, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        works for me
      • 2013-11-04 30812, 2013

      • nikki
        http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-6387 didn't we decided to wontfix this already? :P
      • 2013-11-04 30825, 2013

      • ruaok_
        correct. onward.
      • 2013-11-04 30851, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae leaves MBS-3411 for nikki to update with her proposal
      • 2013-11-04 30852, 2013

      • mb-chat-logger
      • 2013-11-04 30801, 2013

      • nikki
        http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-2255 it seems here #3 is the best solution since we have filtering by subscriptions for reports
      • 2013-11-04 30811, 2013

      • ruaok_
        the reason its not closed was to give ben time to gather more support for his side.
      • 2013-11-04 30817, 2013

      • ruaok_
        I think 6387 should be closed now.
      • 2013-11-04 30836, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        ruaok_: just closed it
      • 2013-11-04 30841, 2013

      • ruaok_
        thx
      • 2013-11-04 30851, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        2255 my last comment from april still stands, and agrees with nikki
      • 2013-11-04 30854, 2013

      • ocharles
        heh
      • 2013-11-04 30830, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        unless I've misunderstood something in the options ocharles had outlined
      • 2013-11-04 30852, 2013

      • ruaok_
        I'm fine with #3.
      • 2013-11-04 30800, 2013

      • ruaok_
        motion carried and onward.
      • 2013-11-04 30805, 2013

      • nikki
        http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-2638 here it's not clear why tags or artist dates aren't sufficient and there are no votes for it either, so I think wontfix
      • 2013-11-04 30807, 2013

      • ocharles
        yea, i agree that 3 is the best way
      • 2013-11-04 30857, 2013

      • ruaok_
        I'm leaning towards wontfix, but using tags is fine too.
      • 2013-11-04 30818, 2013

      • ruaok_
        nikkis comment about being able to compute that info is spot on
      • 2013-11-04 30823, 2013

      • ocharles
        not quite
      • 2013-11-04 30829, 2013

      • ocharles
        there is a reply later saying it's not that simple
      • 2013-11-04 30843, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        the borders are rather fuzzy, yes
      • 2013-11-04 30854, 2013

      • ocharles
        if you extend work attributes to artists, then maybe this is something for artist attributes
      • 2013-11-04 30859, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        some composers it's easy, but for others it's stylistic
      • 2013-11-04 30802, 2013

      • ocharles
        there is a finite domain of periods, yes?
      • 2013-11-04 30809, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        yes
      • 2013-11-04 30810, 2013

      • reodroid
        I'm fine with wontfix, this is almost genderish
      • 2013-11-04 30854, 2013

      • ocharles
        you mean genreish?
      • 2013-11-04 30805, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae doesn't really have an opinion on the topic, I suspect this'll come up at an ostensible classical summit
      • 2013-11-04 30826, 2013

      • ruaok_
        ianmcorvidae: yeah, toss that into the discussion bin for the CSummit.
      • 2013-11-04 30828, 2013

      • ocharles
        it doesn't seem like something you necessarily want to wontfix
      • 2013-11-04 30836, 2013

      • ocharles
        i think it should remain at DR
      • 2013-11-04 30837, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        the nicest solution would be something like the dynamic attributes
      • 2013-11-04 30837, 2013

      • navap
        Postpone for 6 months
      • 2013-11-04 30838, 2013

      • ruaok_
        leave it open for now.
      • 2013-11-04 30840, 2013

      • ocharles
        yea, for after that summit
      • 2013-11-04 30844, 2013

      • ruaok_
        onward.
      • 2013-11-04 30845, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        okay
      • 2013-11-04 30848, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I'll comment to that effect
      • 2013-11-04 30851, 2013

      • ruaok_
        next?
      • 2013-11-04 30852, 2013

      • nikki
        http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-3645 we created this at the rotterdam summit but it has very little support
      • 2013-11-04 30847, 2013

      • ruaok_
        if people don't want it, then fine. ditch it.
      • 2013-11-04 30856, 2013

      • ruaok_
        this is somewhat related to the period ticket.
      • 2013-11-04 30806, 2013

      • ruaok_
        maybe we should take it up in the context of classical.
      • 2013-11-04 30809, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        only in a very vague way
      • 2013-11-04 30816, 2013

      • ocharles
        i'm not so keen on this idea, so i'm ok with a wontfix :)
      • 2013-11-04 30834, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        but I don't really know on this topic, anyway; I think that the specific "century column" idea isn't liked though
      • 2013-11-04 30840, 2013

      • ruaok_
        wontfix then.
      • 2013-11-04 30842, 2013

      • ruaok_
        onward.
      • 2013-11-04 30843, 2013

      • fractalizator2 joined the channel
      • 2013-11-04 30850, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I don't know if the ticket needs to stick around for a different solution to the same problem or not
      • 2013-11-04 30857, 2013

      • Freso
        I think there's another ticket for date uncertainty, isn't there?
      • 2013-11-04 30828, 2013

      • Freso
        The idea as laid out in 3645 doesn't seem like the best approach, Vaclav's comments are a bit better.
      • 2013-11-04 30818, 2013

      • nikki
        http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-975 and http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-4937 are both pretty much asking for merged mbids to redirect to the canonical one, which I agree with but ocharles will surely say "but there is no canonical one!" :P
      • 2013-11-04 30845, 2013

      • ruaok_
        nikki: lets discuss this in january. :-D
      • 2013-11-04 30851, 2013

      • nikki
        haha
      • 2013-11-04 30854, 2013

      • ocharles
        :)
      • 2013-11-04 30803, 2013

      • ruaok_
        srsly, I dont wanna talk about that now. :)
      • 2013-11-04 30805, 2013

      • nikki
        ok
      • 2013-11-04 30817, 2013

      • ruaok_
        we're on a streak. shall we pick a couple more?
      • 2013-11-04 30820, 2013

      • nikki
        http://tickets.musicbrainz.org/browse/MBS-2294 is about showing edits for works under more artists
      • 2013-11-04 30841, 2013

      • nikki
        it seems ollie set it to decision required but I'm not sure what exactly needs deciding
      • 2013-11-04 30843, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae notes that I'm leaving 3645 to someone who has a more eloquent way to wontfix it
      • 2013-11-04 30808, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        heh entity-edit links
      • 2013-11-04 30811, 2013

      • ruaok_
        ianmcorvidae: whats wrong with STFU? :)
      • 2013-11-04 30825, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        :)
      • 2013-11-04 30848, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        I'm not sure what the proposed additions are in 2294
      • 2013-11-04 30856, 2013

      • ruaok_
        2294 seems reasonable to me.
      • 2013-11-04 30812, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        is it some sort of "determine the supposedly-primary artist and link to that one" or "link to all artists we think might be related"
      • 2013-11-04 30823, 2013

      • Freso
        ianmcorvidae: I don't think it should wontfix'd unless Vaclav's comments are in another ticket. Which I'm trying to find, but haven't yet.
      • 2013-11-04 30833, 2013

      • Freso
        3645, that is.
      • 2013-11-04 30843, 2013

      • nikki
        so should we postpone it until next week and try and figure out in the meantime which entities/relationships/artist credits should be included?
      • 2013-11-04 30812, 2013

      • ianmcorvidae
        if someone's taking on that task, then sure
      • 2013-11-04 30828, 2013

      • nikki
        I can at least have a look when I'm not busy trying to find things to discuss :P
      • 2013-11-04 30841, 2013

      • Freso
        MBS-2954 ! Found it!
      • 2013-11-04 30845, 2013

      • mb-chat-logger
      • 2013-11-04 30821, 2013

      • Freso
        Feel free to wontfix 3645 now with no objection from me now. :p (2954 is also DR though.)
      • 2013-11-04 30858, 2013

      • ocharles grumbles something about wifi and 2013
      • 2013-11-04 30804, 2013

      • ocharles waits for jira