#musicbrainz-devel

just now.

thanks

ruaok, kuno: I'm getting my transport sorted tonight :)

hi ocharles

ola!

ocharles: hooray!

warp: where are you staying?

ocharles: you have several open pull requests still, if you could have a look at them and see if you can get some progress made on them that'd be good

ocharles: novatel probably, someone in #faif offered the sofa in their hotel room.

:)

nikki: I can't guarantee anything soon, but i'll try

ocharles: I'll be helping out with video recording in the legal & policy dev room.

nice

also if either of you happen to know how to tell the caa stuff to move images from one bucket to another (which we need to do for CAA-65) or how to insert events (a bunch didn't happen last monday 'cause it failed to the find the releases in our db thanks to all the db problems and cron has been complaining at me hourly ever since), that'd be useful

nikki: I've made some todo items, but I'm way too exhausted to do anything tonight

but I'll try and get some emails out this week on my lunch break or something

thanks :)

bang!

[of] a more less BS open source conference. :)

so, what's new?

earlier today I spoke with a lawyer about getting a german non-profit off the ground.

and I hit a pretty serious snag.

whenever any european company pays anyone, they fork over 19% in taxes.

which, metabrainz in the US doesn't do.

so, moving to the EU has a 19% tax right out of the gate.

ouch.

is that separate from the problem you spoke about before?

oof. yeah, that's a lot

nikki: yes.

yeah, I think the previous bit had been income taxes for the company itself

:/

But this is deductible from money that you spend.

yes, the income taxes seem managable.

I think we're ok.

worst that I saw on that front is that our paid ws would be taxed. no that big a deal.

chirlu`: spend on what?

besides pay, we have hosting costs.

and hosting costs are about half of one employee's cost. (at least right now)

e.g. someone pays you EUR 1190, you have to pay EUR 190 in tax; but then you buy hardware for EUR 1190 and can deduct the EUR 190 tax.

("Allphasennettoumsatzsteuer", looking for an English Wikipedia article …)

heh german words

ah, but we hardly ever buy hardware and in the future likely none at all. it will be all services we pay for.

chirlu`: Like ruaok just said, MeB doesn't really use that kind of monehz.

For services it's the same.

chirlu`: let's discuss this a bit after the meeting. but I've love to get your thoughts.

ah, that's good.

are contractor's considered services?

dienstleistende??

wie der name schon sagt. :)

ok, enough for now.

any discussion on anything?

Uh. Is rika revisited still relevant? nikki?

wait. no new agenda items?

I did some productive work on rika earlier, so right now it's behaving

what the hell?

and I didn't complain once, I even forgot that it's normally unusable

are we slipping or did we solve all of our problems?

nah, we have a bug tracker full

what I've heard from bitmap is that it's been better for him, which I think also has to do with the fact our overall bandwidth cap has gone up since I asked DWNI how it works and it was better than I was expecting

Freso has changed the topic to: An hour of DR's then?

so I think it's better, at least for now

Oops.

ok, interesting.

7topic Southern Hemisphere January week | Agenda: (nuffin')

...

Freso has changed the topic to: Southern Hemisphere January week | Agenda: (nuffin')

one of the topics for chicago has got to be our new web service.

because our hits are flat and our traffic keeps rising.

as people adopt /ws/2

:(

so, nothing needs discussing? everything is clear?

then lets go for some DR tickets. got some nikki?

well, clear enough for until next week, probably :P I have plenty of geordi to do, for my part

bitmap: how are you doing?

I'm up for discussing handball rules, if anyone's got questions about them.

But I doubt that's very on-topic. :p

... also, I seem to be lagging a bit, judging by the web chatlog...

famous last words.

That was a manual reconnect though. Hopefully it's better now. :)

oh, before that

reo did a proposal to remove an attribute from a relationship type, which passed. but now we need to do 60-something thousand edits to remove it

well, we have agreement on something should be used, no?

what if we just make an ordered list of what should be shown?

from frontiest to least frontiest first. :)

well, let's finish nikki's topic first *hits pause button briefly*

ok

do we post a report about what needs to be done?

do we write a script?

a report is useless, nobody in their right mind is going to fix close to 70k things

we could write a script, but I already have the ability to do it with a bot, if I'm allowed to enter more edits than bots are supposed to

not even reo?

not even reo

I'm happy to give you leeway to do it with a bot.

I'm fine with a bot, anyway, if you think it's fine as subscriptions go

if we want to somehow exclude it from subscriptions it gets hairier, but with a bot it can also be done all in the course of one day or whatever so it might be fine

(as long as we say yeah, do whatever, which I think everyone's fine with XD)

+1 to whatever. :)

ok then

cool.

any objections to letting nikki just taking care of it?

ok.

back to 4650?

chirlu`: I don't suppose you also want permission for the discogs thing?

re: 4650

yeah

personally as far as frontiest goes, I've always supported showing *something* even if we don't have something marked as front

I think the main issue is just "are we okay with adding a checkbox to set the front(iest) release" + "does the index.json format sufficiently support that possibility"

Dunno. I’m fine with it taking 8 months, but if others want it faster, I’d need a permission.

and/or, do we want it to be an automatic fallback instead

What's the Discogs thing?

Freso: Changing the artist/label URLs to their new format.

chirlu`: go for it. I'm happy to speed it up

Ah.

I'd +1 to letting that run rampant too.

dunno about rampant, but yes.

+!

and that doesn't affect subscriptions either, so +1 from me as well

4650

and yes, back to that

nikki: I'm curious what you think on the topic of automatic fallback vs. editable marker for 'this should be shown as the front' vs. a mix

I'm ok with a sane order of things to try to show.

not sure we need the checkbox.

where what ruaok is saying is what I'm referring to as automatic fallback, to be clear :)

ok with showing medium if no front is available.

sorry I'm late

hmm. I'm not sure we need another option when the ordering is easily edited as it is

hi bitmap

ruaok: doing well, and, the check arrived in the mail today, just to confirm

great.

when was it promised by?

the 9th?

I think the 8th you said

ffs.

it was slightly late for me this time, I got it on the 9th with promised 8th

I wonder if it was weather-related?