one important reason to not using pg_dump is that you need to export and update the database at the same time
2015-07-15 19609, 2015
luks
otherwise you can't handle replication packets properly
2015-07-15 19651, 2015
luks
the acoustid format for full export is almost identical to MB
2015-07-15 19601, 2015
luks
but the replication format is different
2015-07-15 19656, 2015
ariscop joined the channel
2015-07-15 19617, 2015
Freso
Leo_Verto: git diff $(initial commit)
2015-07-15 19611, 2015
jeffsturgis joined the channel
2015-07-15 19622, 2015
MBJenkins
* Michael Wiencek: Make sure Entity::PartialDate sorts same years the same
2015-07-15 19623, 2015
MBJenkins
* Michael Wiencek: Events in a series should be ordered by date, then name (MBS-7557, MBS-7987)
2015-07-15 19624, 2015
MBJenkins
* Michael Wiencek: Release groups in a series should be ordered by first release date, then name (MBS-7557)
2015-07-15 19625, 2015
MBJenkins
* nikki: Fall back to more languages before giving up and picking randomly
2015-07-15 19626, 2015
MBJenkins
* Michael Wiencek: Do sorting from MBS-7557 on the client too
2015-07-15 19621, 2015
MBJenkins
Michael Wiencek: Remove test Wikipedia link type from orderable_link_type
2015-07-15 19633, 2015
Freso joined the channel
2015-07-15 19627, 2015
d4rkie joined the channel
2015-07-15 19645, 2015
MBJenkins
Yippee, build fixed!
2015-07-15 19646, 2015
MBJenkins
Michael Wiencek: Correctly validate date ranges between fuzzy dates
2015-07-15 19621, 2015
MBJenkins
Michael Wiencek: Use Date::Calc to simplify is_date_range_valid logic
2015-07-15 19656, 2015
bitmap
heh
2015-07-15 19642, 2015
ianmcorvidae
lol
2015-07-15 19648, 2015
ianmcorvidae
maybe not then I guess XD
2015-07-15 19618, 2015
diana_olhovik joined the channel
2015-07-15 19659, 2015
bitmap
hm, well seems unrelated to that, since it fails on hobbes if I revert that too. but need to sleep now so I guess we'll find out tomorrow
2015-07-15 19601, 2015
ariscop joined the channel
2015-07-15 19605, 2015
ohrstrom joined the channel
2015-07-15 19615, 2015
ruaok joined the channel
2015-07-15 19602, 2015
reosarevok joined the channel
2015-07-15 19605, 2015
UmkaDK joined the channel
2015-07-15 19658, 2015
Leo_Verto
Freso, okay, if you have two branches with a common ancestor and no rebasing or merging, you should be able to use git diff otherbranch...
2015-07-15 19640, 2015
Freso
Leo_Verto: Not two branches. One branch.
2015-07-15 19652, 2015
Leo_Verto
Hm
2015-07-15 19627, 2015
Freso
Leo_Verto: One branch, no branching off. I want to compare the repository (or a single file in it) from the initial commit to the current situation (or any given point in between).
2015-07-15 19634, 2015
Leo_Verto
git rev-list --max-parents=0 HEAD gets the first commit
2015-07-15 19657, 2015
Leo_Verto
so git diff $(git rev-list --max-parents=0 HEAD) HEAD should work
2015-07-15 19600, 2015
Freso
I can also do some `git log` magic.
2015-07-15 19612, 2015
Leo_Verto
git log apparently shouldn't be used for scripting
2015-07-15 19657, 2015
Freso
This is not for a script, or a long-winded solution like that wouldn't be a problem.
2015-07-15 19612, 2015
Leo_Verto
mhm, "git diff $(git rev-list --max-parents=0 HEAD) HEAD" seems to work though
Hello, guys I installed my own MB slave server with the github install.md instructions. All is working fine (including replication changes). However, I have some questions. 1. How can I disable the memory, time and data statistics when opening through the browser? 2. I'm trying to use the mbcontrol.sh startup script from this guide: http://www.tranquilbase.org/how-to-setup-your-own….
2015-07-15 19611, 2015
kooimens
The script is not working for me, only when I use "exec plackup -Ilib -r" instead of "exec plackup -Ilib -s FCGI -E deployment --listen $SOCKET --nproc $NPROC --pid fcgi.pid --keep-stderr=1". What do I have to change to make the last part work?
2015-07-15 19616, 2015
diana_olhovik joined the channel
2015-07-15 19642, 2015
rknLA joined the channel
2015-07-15 19654, 2015
rknLA has left the channel
2015-07-15 19618, 2015
rknLA joined the channel
2015-07-15 19643, 2015
rknLA
hi, i'm having some trouble figuring out the id spaces and data schemas... i'm trying to go from searching for a recording to getting information about a work
2015-07-15 19600, 2015
rknLA
but in the recording object, there are lots of ids, and none of them seem to resolve when i use them as work ids
2015-07-15 19619, 2015
ruaok
rknLA: hey.
2015-07-15 19635, 2015
ruaok
works are linked to recordings via what we call Advanced Relationships.
a recording would be "Beethoven's 5th conducted by Karajan, movement I."
2015-07-15 19608, 2015
rknLA
i'm looking for a work
2015-07-15 19628, 2015
rknLA
but the docs weren't really clear on how to search for works, and the python library had a way to search for recordings, so i figured there must be some way to go from recording to work
so, at a high level, my goal is to find the songwriter of a recording.. is there any kind of convention for which recordings have works associated with them?
2015-07-15 19632, 2015
alastairp
I'll regenerate the docs
2015-07-15 19651, 2015
rknLA
:) glad to help!
2015-07-15 19616, 2015
reosarevok
ruaok: heh. that last email was... interesting :p
2015-07-15 19618, 2015
alastairp
the only convention is "if it exists and someone has added it"
2015-07-15 19628, 2015
alastairp
the important part being this "if someone has added it"
2015-07-15 19648, 2015
rknLA
word
2015-07-15 19610, 2015
ruaok
reosarevok: yep. lots of interesting stuff coming. :)
also, it looks like the search method does its damndest to return you _something_ even when there's no real strong/exact match?
2015-07-15 19636, 2015
rknLA
also, search doesn't support `includes`, right? so there are at least 3 web calls per attempt here?
2015-07-15 19637, 2015
alastairp
correct, search doesn't support includes
2015-07-15 19646, 2015
alastairp
you could check for a score of 100 in the results
2015-07-15 19604, 2015
rknLA
ahhh score, perfect
2015-07-15 19647, 2015
alastairp
you'll probably find that many of the recordings in the search results will have the same work
2015-07-15 19657, 2015
alastairp
but I don't think you can find that out until you query each of them
2015-07-15 19619, 2015
rknLA
gotcha.
2015-07-15 19626, 2015
rknLA
another question, about `id`:
2015-07-15 19609, 2015
rknLA
what is the id in a `track-list` item? it didn't look like there was a concept of `track` in mb
2015-07-15 19604, 2015
alastairp
yes, tracks are not really exposed in the website much
2015-07-15 19612, 2015
alastairp
a track is "a recording in this specific release"
2015-07-15 19621, 2015
alastairp
because recordings can appear on many releases
2015-07-15 19644, 2015
rknLA
gotcha
2015-07-15 19624, 2015
rknLA
hmm... how is `ext:score` calculated? i just got a score of 100 when the artist matched correctly, but the track that i searched for was not in the system
2015-07-15 19652, 2015
alastairp
it's returned by lucene. I don't know how it's computed
2015-07-15 19605, 2015
alastairp
note that you can use the advanced search syntax and tell it to match only on the title field
